Grant-Kohrs Ranch
Kohrs and Bielenberg Home Ranch
Historic Resource Study/Historic Structure Report/Historical Data
|
|
IV. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
The park has recently begun and has virtually completed the visitor
services development required for its opening, planned for the late
summer of 1976. Current planning (February 1976) has resulted in the
formation of a General Management Plan team that is preparing this
document. Prior to this, the Outline of Planning Requirements and
Statement for Management were both prepared. In all phases of their
preparation, cultural resource specialists (a historian, an
archeologist, and a historical architect) were consulted. The planning
team assembled to write the General Management Plan includes a
historian, a historical architect, and at the insistence of those two, a
curator. It is unlikely that the General Management Plan will be
prepared in isolation from cultural resource considerations.
While the Outline of Planning Requirements and the Statement for
Management are currently the two active planning and development
documents, it is of some value to consider what the planning and
development considerations have been to date in order to better
understand current and probable future development at the park.
Accordingly, the following list, noting the documents involved and
containing a brief synopsis of their content, is provided. All are on
file at the Denver Service Center, Midwest/Rocky Mountain Team or
Historic Preservation Division, Denver Service Center.
TITLE | SYNOPSIS |
"Alternatives Study Report, Grant-Kohrs Ranch," Office of Resource
Planning, San Francisco Service Center, February 1968 (Merrill J. Mattes
and John Calef).
|
This study contains excellent aerial photographs of the site and a
concise narrative description of the area and its resources. It
explored two alternatives: (1) a historic house museum, and (2)
incorporating the entire ranch headquarters complex and operating it as
a contemporary ranch, with a resident rancher as concessionaire. The
study indicated that cattle ranching was overlooked in the National Park
Service-managed areas as of early 1968.
|
"Supplementary Report to Alternative Study," dated 2/68, Office of
Environmental Planning and Design, SSC-24 October 1969.
|
This supplementary report restated the earlier alternatives and
formally recommended acquisition of the entire ranch headquarters site.
|
"Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement: Grant-Kohrs Ranch National
Historic Site," San Francisco Field Office, Office of Environmental
Planning and Design, 14 December 1971.
|
This preliminary statement discusses alternatives and impacts, adverse
effects of proposed use as a park, and mitigating measures This document
appears to be based on the assumption that retention of the contemporary
agricultural scene should be a prime goal of any future National Park
Service Management.
|
"Master Plan--Proposed Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site,
Montana," Denver Service Center, November 1971.
|
This is the initial master plan, containing most of the standard
alternatives to visitor use and development, statements of management
objectives, as well as an excellent historical narrative in the
"Resource Description and Evaluation" portion. This is the first lengthy
and probing planning document.
|
"Conceptual Development Working Paper for Properties Adjacent to the
Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site, Appendix A," Denver Service
Center, (1973?).
|
This study evaluates the lands surrounding the park and the commercial
influences on those areas. It appears to have been designed to serve as
an appendix of the master plan. It is a clear statement of the general
conditions facing the lands adjacent to the park.
|
"An Archeological Survey of the Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic
Site," Floyd W. Sharrock, University of Montana, November 1973.
|
This is a narrative report of an archeological survey. It contains a map
showing site locations and presents artifact descriptions as well as
recommendations for archeological investigations needed.
|
"Interpretive Input for Master Plan," Denver Service Center, 16 December
1974.
|
This brief paper outlines the main interpretive themes of the site
(three periods: Grant, 1859-1866; Kohrs, 1866-1900; Kohrs-Warren,
1900-1940) and presents an approach of utilizing contemporary ranching
techniques as a "living ranch."
|
"Planning Directive, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site," draft,
19 August 1974.
|
This is an excellent summing up of the need for master plan revisions
as of mid-1974, and of the site access problems that at the time were a
dominant planning feature.
|
"Interim Interpretive Prospectus, Grant-Kohrs Ranch," James L. Massey,
Denver Service Center, 7 January 1975.
|
This is an expanded version of the "Interpretive Input for Master Plan"
cited immediately above, and conforms generally to it. It was to be
used for the park pending a more formal interpretive prospectus.
|
"Interpretive Objectives," Grant-Kohrs Ranch NHS staff, ca. May-June
1975.
|
This two-page outline set a timetable for development of visitor
services in the first three years of park operations.
|
"Management Objectives," Grant-Kohrs Ranch NHS staff, ca. May-June 1975.
|
This outline document establishes general management objectives and
site-operating objectives. It calls for stabilization and restoration
of the site to represent an 1880-1900 date, but without major alteration
of buildings erected after that period.
|
"Environmental Assessment, Grant-Kohrs Ranch Natition of the
Environment" and "Description and Impact of Analysis of the
Alternatives." (Development Alternative D.3 represents the chosen alternative,
which was arrived at following public meetings conducted in March of
1975 when this document was still in draft form.)onal Historic
Site, Montana," Denver Service Center, March 1973.
|
This major study contains the currently used environmental
assessment sections, including a lengthy "Descrip
|
Memorandum, 10 March 1975, Stell Newman to Fred Babb, Denver Service
Center.
|
Outlines the legislative compliance steps necessary before development
alternatives can be chosen and announced to the public or construction
contracts let.
|
Memorandum, 13 March 1975, John Albright to Ben Brandt, Denver Service
Center.
|
Recommends choice of Development D.3 for implementation as having the
least adverse effect and most beneficial mitigating measures.
|
Memorandum, 13 March 1975, Peter Snell to Manager, Rocky Mountain Team,
Denver Service Center.
|
Recommends choice of Development Alternative D.3 for implementation as
having the least adverse effect and most beneficial mitigating
measures.
|
Memorandum to Superintendent, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site,
from Rocky Mountain Region, 8 April 1975.
|
Called for archeological survey of proposed development area, and
comments at public meeting in March 1975.
|
Memorandum, Winnie Brown to Wilfred Logan, Denver Service Center, 18
July 1975.
|
Reported on archeological survey of proposed development site.
|
Memorandum, Team Manager, Midwest/Rocky Mountain Team, from Director,
Rocky Mountain Region, 18 July 1975.
|
Confirms the selection of alternatives in the environmental assessment
and asks for preparation of the General Management Plan for the
park.
|
Draft text, exhibit at Grant-Kohrs Ranch, by Judy Harkison, 25 July 1975.
|
Text for visitor information signs and exhibits. (This document was
greatly modified by October 1975.)
|
"Statement for Management, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site," 5 November 1975.
|
Follows current format and outlines management and development
objectives currently held.
|
"Task Directive--Package 113, Grant-Kohrs Ranch, Historic Structure Report, Ranch House and Principal Structures," Peter Snell, Denver Service Center, 4 December 1975.
|
Follows current format for task directives, outlining funds and programs
needed at the present time to complete the requirements of Package
113.
|
"General Management Planning Program for Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site,"
13 January 1976.
|
This is the current planning document, which will be followed by the
compilation of the General Management Plan.
|
A. Planning Studies and Reports Needed
The Task Directive for Package 113 and the
"Recommendations" section of the Historic
Resource Study denote those studies still required by law and by
National Park Service policy in order to compile the necessary
data for any projected development at the park.
B. Recommendations or Special Considerations
1. Park Staff
There is little doubt that the park requires the services of a
formally trained curator in residence to direct the maintenance of the
rich collection of furnishings and ranching and farming equipment at the
site. Consideration should be given to this obvious need as soon as
possible. Proper care and maintenance of the extensive and fragile
collection of artifacts and documents at the ranch is as imperative as
is the immediate structural preservation of the buildings. The
collections as well as the artifacts come under the protection of the
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Executive Order 11593, and of
National Park Service historic preservation policy.
2. Restoration
While the General Management Plan is yet to be written, some
documents outlining various interpretive alternatives suggest an
emphasis be put on operating the park as an 1880-1900-period ranch.
While these are only alternatives and do recommend that later buildings
be retained, the concept of returning the ranch or any of its components
to a certain period will always carry with it the threat of demolishing
buildings equally historic but more modern. The question of setting an
interpretive date, therefore, should be answered only after carefully
considering the best method of protecting the integrity of the entire
site and the most imaginative approach to interpreting the resource and
its history. It should be realized that the site represents a unique
opportunity to introduce the visitor to ranching history from 1862 to
1972.
3. Scenic Easements
The scenic easements on the land immediately adjacent to the fee
simple lands, on which the prime historical properties stand, afford
adequate protection for the historical integrity of the scene. Indeed,
inasmuch as they permit current livestock management practices, it may
be hoped that the ranchers using the scenic easement lands will follow
normal stock-growing trends in the future, which will afford visitors a
look at current practices in the cattle business while the park shows
how it was carried on from 1862 to the present.
Yet there is another consideration regarding scenic easements, and
that concerns the lands further removed from the park but in direct
visual relationship to it. Specifically, these include the hills and
benchlands north and west of the fee simple lands. A careful
determination of the lands involved will be needed, since the amount of
acreage will probably be considerable. At current land prices in Powell
County, Montana, the cost of securing such easements will be great
enough to necessitate securing additional funds from Congress. The
merits and liabilities of such a course should be considered as soon as
possible, and should be addressed in the General Management Plan.
4. Interpretation
Among the aspects of historic preservation involved with the area is
the accurate presentation of the significance of the site and its
history to the public. This will require considerable research in the
near future. The required research is discussed in the "Recommendations"
section of the Historic Resource Study.
grko/hrs/crs4.htm
Last Updated: 14-Oct-2014
|