PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Pima and Papago are closely related physically and are of
unusually tall statue for American Indians. The Pima average 171.8 cms.
and are probably the third tallest group of American Indians. They are
markedly dolicocephalic or narrow headed as are the Papago. The Papago
average 170.9 cms. in stature. (Hrdlicka, 1908, 132.) Both tend to a
heavy build or corpulency and are notably dark in skin color in contrast
to some of the surrounding tribes. The Pima and Papago resembles most
closely the ancient peoples of southern Utah, a few of the Pueblo
tribes, the Utes and Paiutes, and the peoples speaking related languages
to the south of them in Mexico, particularly Tarahumare, Yaqui, Aztecs,
and also the Tarascan speaking peoples. They show less resemblance to
their near neighbors of Yuman speech and the Apache. (Hrdlicka, 1908,
10;13.)
The Apaches are of a radically different type, not resembling either
their neighbors or the ancient inhabitants of the Southwestern area.
The average male statures of the western group very somewhat as follows:
White Mountain, 171.1 cms., San Carlos, 169.6 cms. They are remarkably
brachycephalic. An unusual degree of homogeneity exists among them,
despite the earlier assumption that they had been much modified by the
inclusion among them of Mexican captives and other peoples. They differ
somewhat from their nearest linguistic relatives, the Navaho, the
closest resemblance being with Lipan, Havasupai, and Talapai.
(Hrdlicka, 1908, 8; 13; 123-3.) Many more detailed statistics are given
by Hrdlicka (1908).
Museum Display
Face masks or busts of a man and a woman for the Pima or Papago and
the Apache should be shown. These might be supplemented by pictures.
(For Pima and Papago pictures see: Hrdlicka, 1906, plate 34; Lensmore,
various plates; Russell, 1908, plates 2, 17, 36-38; 42-48; Hodge, 1910,
251; Dorsey, 1903, 181-3; 186; 188; 190. For the Apache see Bourke,
1891, 49; 240; 304; 416.) There exist numerous photographs and pictures
of noted Apache such as Geronimo and the Bureau of Ethnology report for
1912 mentions the taking of Apache photographs. (Annual report
34:28)
Possibly a chart of comparative statures and head shapes might be
represented for the region. If this seems desireable, the data may be
found in Hrdlicka (1908).
LANGUAGE
Pima and Papago speak closely related dialects. Pima scarcely
differs from Pima Bajo, spoken in central Sonora, and the separation of
the two groups must have taken place in recent times. The linguistic
affiliations are interesting. Pima is closely allied to Tepehuan, less
close to a group which cuts across between Tepehuan and Pima including
Yaqui-Mayo, Tarrahumare, Opata, and Concho, all of which are in turn
related to Aztec or Nahuatl and form part of the larger grouping known
as Uto-Aztecan, which includes the Shoshonean tribes of the Great Basin,
southern California, Hopi, and Commanche. (Thomas and Swanton;
unpublished data from A. L. Kroeber.)
The Apache are members of the great Na-Dene family from which they
are separated by hundreds of miles. The various bands of Apache and the
Navaho speak closely related languages, showing they came from the north
in a group. Linguistic studies afford the principal evidence for their
late arrival in the Southwest.
Museum Display
If anything at all is shown, the distribution of the two great
linguistic stocks should be indicated. The base map illustrating
Sapir's re-classification which is available in the Field Educational
Headquarters, at Berkeley, should be used. More detailed data on
interrelations within the stocks should be secured from Prof. A. L.
Kroeber of the Department of Anthropology of the University of
California at Berkeley and Prof. Edward Sapir at Yale University.
|