BIG BEND
The Impact of Human Use Upon the Chisos Basin and Adjacent Lands
NPS Scientific Monograph No. 4
NPS Logo

CHAPTER 8:
Future Vegetation on the Basin

The vegetation of the Chisos Basin in the future will show a shift in dominance in several areas, provided prevailing conditions continue to support the present trees and seedlings. Present evidence suggests that, above the Upper Basin complex, conditions are favoring the more mesic species, whereas in the impacted areas the more xeric species are favored.

A total census taken along the trail from Juniper Flat to the Laguna Meadow Trail is presented in Table 16. The census was taken in the manner described previously under trail impact. The Quercus grisea-Pinus cembroides tree-dominated trailside is shifting to a possible Q. emoryi-Juniperus deppeana vegetation type. This infrequently used trail is on a western exposure; the lower end is more southern and the upper portion more northern. The numerous Q. gravesii seedlings censused are significant as they are the most mesically adapted species listed.

The census of the circle at Boulder Meadow, at a higher elevation, presents a different dynamic pattern (Table 17). The importance of this census is the significant number of Juniperus flaccida and J. deppeana. This site gives the highest reproductive ratio, 1 tree: 13 seedlings, of any area censused in the basin. A similar ratio for the previous trail sector was 1 tree: 7 seedlings, a rather high value. A similar value for the impacted areas of the basin is less than 1:2.

The results of a series of censuses taken in the Upper Basin region are presented in Table 18. A raw comparison between the areas is not valid, but a comparison with percentages and within an area is significant. The total census presents the trend for the area from the stone cottages to the Campfire Circle, with emphasis upon the mesic northern exposure. The large number of Prosopis glandulosa seedlings is of interest for this species is a "weedy" introduction. All sites favor the xeric species, Juniperus pinchoti and Quercus grisea, as their tree-to-seedling reproductive ratios are greater. Every area had less Pinus cembroides seedlings than trees.

The outlook for tree reproduction is good for those areas not presently under severe impact. This impact, as demonstrated by Table 18. need not be more than a trail dissecting the slope or area. The flat area (3), below the Ranger Station, no longer has heavy impact and shows the greatest tree-to-seedling ratio, 1:3. Included in those areas under impact would be the vegetation directly below the miles of basin trails, which show a decreased reproductive rate. This, I believe, results from falling rock and soil along with disrupted natural drainage patterns by the trails. If the trails continue to deteriorate, the condition will become more severe with time. These areas are now more open, thus more xeric, during a time when the major vegetation conditions are favoring the more mesic species.

Table 16. Tree and seedling census along trail from Juniper Flat to Laguna Meadow Trail.


SpeciesAbove trail
Below trail
Grand
Total
0-55-10Total0-55-10Total

Trees:
Pinus cembroides 12820681434
Juniperus deppeana 7310651121
Juniperus flaccida
33


3
Juniperus pinchoti


1
11
Quercus grisea 81624491337
Quercus emoryi 2571
18
Quercus gravesii


1122

293564192342106

Seedlings:
Pinus cembroides 2218401482262
Juniperus deppeana 68501185446100218
Juniperus flaccida 3581151624
Juniperus pinchoti 11112
Quercus grisea 7250122254267189
Quercus emoryi 8158139582987226
Quercus gravesii 2115366111753
Prosopis glandulosa 2
2


2

270196466169141310776

Dead trees:
Pinus cembroides
223146
Juniperus spp. 3
343710
Quercus spp. 915241131438

1217291872554


Table 17. Tree and seedling census along trail in circle at Boulder Meadow.


SpeciesWithin circle
Total
0-55-10

Trees:
Pinus cembroides246
Juniperus deppeana6612
Juniperus flaccida
11
Quercus grisea213
Quercus emoryi
11
Quercus gravesii
11

101424

Seedlings:
Pinus cembroides154863
Juniperus deppeana415192
Juniperus flaccida271946
Quercus grisea213

85119204

Dead trees:
Pinus cembroides
22
Juniperus spp.125
Quercus spp.123

4610


Table 18. Tree and seedling census of several areas in the Chisos Basin.


SpeciesLocationsa
Total
123 456

Trees:
Pinus cembroides100 741617 457260
Juniperus deppeana59 473 7282
Juniperus flaccida15 333 2
26
Juniperus pinchoti4 841 1422
Quercus grisea9 2136 8855
Quercus emoryi5
21
19

193 1103531 6322454

Seedlings:
Pinus cembroides58 37137 153133
Juniperus deppeana50 17134 3491
Juniperus flaccida4 1231 4
24
Juniperus pinchoti11 30388 123102
Quercus grisea11 38145 81288
Quercus emoryi9 1311

24
Quercus gravesii
1



1
Prosopis glandulosa
16273 6557

143 16410929 4827520

Dead trees:
Pinus cembroides9 1345 11143
Juniperus spp.25 131322 1713103
Quercus spp.31 25131 1980

65 513028 1933226

a1 North exposure of ravine east of stone cottages.
 2 North exposure of ravine from Campfire Circle to Ranger Station.
 3 Large flat to the west of the corral near Ranger Station.
 4 Circle of Window view hill.
 5 North exposure of the Window view hill to trail below.
 6 South exposure of the Window view hill to ravine below.


<<< Previous <<< Contents >>> Next >>>


chap8.htm
Last Updated: 1-Apr-2005