Department of Interior
National Park Service
Crater Lake National Park
Oregon
By Earl U. Homuth
Park Ranger Naturalist
August 1, 1928 |
C. G. Thomson
Superintendent
Vol. 1, No. 2 |
This is the second of a series of bulletins issued monthly during
the season to give information on subjects of interest concerning the
natural history of Crater Lake. It is supplemental to the lectures and
field trips conducted by the Park naturalist.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Publications using extracts kindly credit the bulletin and
author.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For copies, which are free, address the Superintendent or
Ranger-naturalist.
Crater Lake
By Earl U. Homuth
In the last issue of these notes, the evidences that a mountain did
exist where Crater Lake now lies, were discussed.
What has become of Mt. Mazama ?
It may be claimed that no mountain existed and that the crater as it
was now lies before us. But, other than the evidence that a mountain
once existed is the fact that the walls of the caldera show cut edges of
lava and are not coated or covered with a material which might have
issued from this opening.
Two possibilities then remain: first, that a tremendous explosion
removed the mass of the peak, or second, that the volcano fell in upon
itself.
That terrific explosions did occur in the history of Mt. Mazama is
evidenced by the pumice material found about the rim and the outlying
region. However, as Diller points out in his paper "Geology of Crater
Lake National Park" (Professional Paper No.3, Series B) this material is
different from the material of the mass of the mountain judging that
mass from the lava of the rim. Furthermore, the quantity thus removed
would total approximately 17 cubic miles, which, if laid down three
miles from the rim would give a layer a thousand feet thick. No such
mass of material is present.
The remaining possibility is that the peak fell in upon itself. Had
it fallen in as a solid mountain the displacement of the material at the
base would have split the base completely assunder. The rim however, is
not split; it is entire throughout its circumference. That the summit
should fall into the neck of lava is possible, but offers no solution,
since the amount of material would be just as great, although more of it
now molten. That the lava of the volcano should escape through a radial
vent, or a great fissure upon the lower slopes, thus draining the center
remains as a final possible explanation.
Whether the entire column of lava escaped from one vent, or appeared
at one point on the surface may be open to question. If the original
mountain was equal to Shasta in height the column of lava totaled ten
thousand feet, since the lake bottom is 4,200 feet above sea level.
Furthermore, the material of the solid mountain must be accounted for,
as having fallen into the resulting crater, when the support of the
original lava was withdrawn. This material would then also have been
fused and withdrawn.
A difficulty in this theory lies in the fact that the lava which can
be definitely claimed as having issued from Mt. Mazama has not been
determined. The level of the final withdrawal could not be above the
4,200 foot contour since this is the level to which it receded in the
caldera.
That the entire mass could have drained into some great subterranean
cavity is also possible but rather dodges the issue.
Whatever the explanation, a caldera has resulted nearly three
thousand feet deep from the lowest point on the rim to the bottom, and
this in turn filled with a lake, two thousand feet deep at its deepest
sounding.
The possible origin of the lake itself will be discussed in a future
issue of these notes.
|