Volume X No. 2 - July, 1937
The Geology Of Union Peak
By Carl E. Dutton, Ranger Naturalist
Union Peak is the most conspicuous topographic feature in the
southwestern portion of the park, its summit being 7698 feet above sea
level and over 1000 feet above the general level of the adjacent area.
The upper 800 feet of the peak stands as a rock spire above a ridge-like
base which is the drainage divide between Union Creek to the north and
Red Blanket Creek to the south, both streams being tributaries of the
Rogue River. Union Peak is visible from many parts of the park. From
almost any viewpoint it is symmetrical in outline, being somewhat like
an inverted "U". The summit of the peak is a ridge 50 feet long from
east to west and about 15 feet wide from north to south. A sketch of a
view of Union Peak appears on the cover of this issue of Nature
Notes.
The relatively simple structure of Union Peak is the key to its
geology. The spire of the peak consists of a gray igneous rock the
minerals of which are too small to be recognized without magnification.
This central rock mass has been broken into blocks by systems of
fractures which probably formed as the mass solidified and cooled.
There are relatively few blocks even closely resembling the typical
six-sided columns which usually form as hot igneous masses cool and
contract. There is general radial arrangement of the planes of fracture
in the spire-like mass of the peak.
Although most of the spire is composed of the fine grained gray
rock, on the eastern side near the summit there is an area or mass of
very different material. The material is dark dray to black. It
consists of fragments of various sizes arranged in poorly defined layers
whose inclination is toward the west, that is, toward the central
portion of the peak.
Structures exposed around the base of the peak are also significant.
At the eastern side of the peak there is an area in which a layered
arrangement of material is also evident. These layers are composed of
numerous angular fragments, varying widely in size, and a great
proportion of very fine material. The layers are inclined steeply
toward the east.
At the western base of the peak layered material is exposed. Those
layers, the top and bottom of each being irregular and rough, do not
show any fragmental characteristics. The inner portion of each layer is
composed of rather uniformly fine grained, dark gray to black rock.
Union Peak is described in Professional Paper No. 3 as being of
volcanic origin.* The description states that the spire or central
portion of the peak represents lava which rose and solidified in the
vent of a volcano. Such a conclusion must have been based on the
exposed structures, described above. The layered fragmental material at
the eastern base of the peak is a portion of the cone having been
removed by erosion. The material at the western base of the peak
represents a portion of the cone which was built by successive
outpourings of lava flows.
The black cindery material near the summit of the peak represents an
interesting relationship. The usual inclination of layers in a volcanic
cone is outward from the center; however, in the mass near the summit
the inclination is toward the center. Because of this relationship to
the central spire the mass of cindery material may represent explosive
fragments which fell on the inward facing slope within the crater of the
cone, the inclination of layers having been controlled by the slope of
the wall of the crater.
The structure visible at Union Peak indicate that it was a center of
volcanic activity. The present physical features of the peak are the
result of processes which acted since the cone was built by volcanic
activity. Glaciers and running water are in part at least responsible
for the partial destruction of the former cone which may have stood at
an elevation somewhat higher than the present peak.
Just north of the peak there are several broad flat valleys. These
are obviously of glacial origin. Valleys of similar origin exist to the
south and west of the peak. It has been shown that Union Peak is a
remnant of a once larger cone. The fact that the lower slopes show
evidence of glaciation also indicates that the peak was at one time
sufficiently large to permit a heavy accumulation of snow which fed the
glaciers on the slopes of the peak, glacial action having cut the
U-shaped valleys to the north, south, and west. The isolated position
and the spire-like character of the remaining portion of the cone is
perhaps a measure of the extent to which material was removed by
glaciation. The materials composing the cone would be much more easily
eroded than the solid mass of rock which filled the central vent of the
cone. By repeated glaciation the material of the cone was evidently
stripped away from the "plug".
Union Peak is also of interest because of several detailed features.
The blocks of rock in the talus on the southeastern and southwestern
sides contain in abundance a mineral whose chemical composition is
identical to that of quartz, but whose physical properties are
sufficiently different that this variety is designated as cristobalite.
This mineral was first discovered in Mexico and has since been found at
relatively few places in the world. It is thus rather surprising to
find the mineral in such abundance at Union Peak. Although the crystals
are seldom more than 1mm in their greatest dimension, they are well
formed double-ended four-sided pyramids. The crystals formed as
coatings in the cavities of the rock, evidently having been deposited
from solution which filled or passed through the cavities.
Blobs of glass occur on fragments of rock at the summit of the peak.
The glass is present on some fragments which are apparently the result
of residual disintegration, and also present on fragments at the top of
a crudely built "monument". The blisters of glass are distinctly
surficial phenomena. The only logical explanation seems to be that
fusion has been produced by strokes of lightning hitting the peak.
*Diller, J. S. and Patton, H. S., The Geology and Petrography
of Crater Lake National Park, U. S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper 3, P. 20,
1902.
|