A NEW TONIC FOR SUB-ALPINE MEADOWS
Resource managers experimented last year with a new solution to an
old problem. The problem dealt with revegetating sites in the sub-alpine
meadows which are damaged by overuse or erosion. The solution involved
hand transplanting greenhouse propagated native species to the damaged
sites. As a naturalist at Longmire, I was fortunate to have a project
day assigned to helping park botanists with a planting project near
Myrtle Falls at Paradise.
In order for the National Park Service to maintain their standard of
preserving scenery, the meadows should be maintained as much as possible
in their natural state. However, it is not possible for over a million
people to visit the meadows annually without leaving their impact. Much
of the denudation in the meadows is due to the existence of trails, both
"social" and maintained. The thin, volcanic soil is easily disturbed by
continued impact from footprints, along with erosion from wind and
water.
In the past, the denuded areas were covered with jute netting, a
fibrous rope material which helps stop erosion by stabilizing the soil.
Resource managers also tried raking the soil and scattering seeds over
the sites. The success of this method was limited by the short growing
season of the sub-alpine meadows which allows minimal time for seed
germination and plant growth. Rangers experimented with digging up
plants from healthy areas and transplanting them to damaged ones. While
this gave the newly established plants a head start, it also left a hole
in the spot where they were dug. Care had to be taken to refill the
transplant sites with soil and avoid taking too many plants from one
location.
Improvements in ground coverings and the use of greenhouses for plant
propagation have improved revegetation methods. As I worked with park
botanists, Gina Rochefort and Mignonne Bivon, and volunteer Steve
Gibbons, I asked them questions about this method. Gina explained that
she became interested in using the greenhouse as a means of growing
native plants when she heard about a revegetation project at North
Cascades National Park, where over 7,000 plants are grown annually and
transplanted into sub-alpine meadows. She spoke with the volunteers who
developed the project and decided to try a similar one at Mount Rainier.
Along with the sedge, partridgefoot and alpine timothy grown at North
Cascades, Gina raised lupine, aster, sitka valerian, native thistle and
phlox.
We planted three species of "plugs" near Myrtle Falls -- sedge,
lupine and partridgefoot. Preparations for planting began in 1984, when
seeds and plant stock were collected. Volunteers from the Native Plant
Society and Gina collected lupine seeds, which were scarified and planted
in individual pots at the greenhouse. Gina and Steve collected plugs
of partridgefoot and sedge to be used for vegetative propagation in
the winter. Partridgefoot was grown from cuttings and the sedge from
plant divisions.
Botanists also collected seeds and plant stock from Indian Henry's,
Tipsoo Lake, and Sunrise. To avoid altering the genetic diversity of the
separate meadows, Gina labeled the plants according to their collection
site. This assured us that revegetated sites received stock of the
same genetic makeup.
After seeing all the time and care that went into the collection and
propagation stages, I was eager to learn about the planting process.
We chose a cool September day for planting. Fall is prefered for planting
since the moisture level is higher than the summer monts, yet the ground
is not frozen. The first season's snowfall flocked the huckleberry and
mountain ash bushes which were deep shades of red and orange. Dark,
billowy clouds lined the Tatoosh Range, telling us that heavier snowfalls
were not far off.
We spent over three hours at the site, planting 170 plugs and recording
data for future monitoring. First we swept snow from the social trail and
arranged the pots four to six inches apart, scattering them to avoid the
appearance odf rows. The planting process went quickly. Next we scattered
measured quantities of lily, western anemone and aster seeds over the soil.
The use of seeds allows for comparison of survival rates between plants
established from stock or seed.
Since this is a pilot project at Mount Rainier, it is important to monitor
plant survival. The first step in the monitoring process was to photograph
the revegetated area. Next Gina laid a square grid over randomly selected
sites and tallied the number of plants and the species found within each
square inch. The combination of pictures and grid tallies allows the
botanists to return next year and assess the survival of plants.
One final step remained before we left. Without some type of protective
covering, the soil around the plants would beging to wash away, leaving
erosion gullies. Therefore, we spread two types of netting over the plants
which would lessen raindrop impact and erosion. The new groundcovers also
help retain moisture and modify the soil temperature. Excelsior was used on
one trail, which is a one-inch layer of shredded aspen bark, woven in a
photo-degradable netting. We used another ground cover called Roll-ite,
made of paper and nylon mesh, on the other trail. Before leaving, we cut
holes in the netting around the taller plants and pulled the stalks through
so they would not be crushed. By using two types of groundcover, Gina hopes
to determine if either affects plant survival. She will also compare the
biodegradability of Excelsior and Roll-ite, the decay period may be as long
as three years.
Wen we finished, a green bed of plants tucked under tan netting greeted
our eyes. Soon, someone else came to admire our work. The sound of a
whistle by Myrtle Falls caught my attention. A hoary marmot squatted on
its haunches, eyeing us. After contemplating its next move, the marmot
charged past us and scurried over the plants we had so carefully tended.
Now we might be able to persuade visitors not to use this trail any more,
but how do you convince a marmot of that?
I returned a few weeks later to see how they plants fared. All the
lupine had been neatly mowed off, no doubt the work of hungry marmots,
feasting before their winter famine. The sedge and partridgefoot looked
hardy; perhaps even the lupine would live if the root stock was established.
The revegetation project at Myrtle Falls is only one of the targeted
transplant areas. Revegetation efforts are also planned at Sunrise, and
Eunice Lake, along with more work at Paradise, Indian Henry's and Tipsoo
Lake. In 1986 Gina planted 4-6,000 plants. In the future she may
consider contracting out the greenhouse work so she can devote time to
other projects such as the rare and exotic plant list and the inventory
of Brockman plots.
In the past, park personnel and volunteers lent a hand for resource
management projects such as exotic plant removal, biological control and
seed collection. Several people helped propagate and water the plants in
the greenhouse this past year. Gina welcomes help from those interested
in working in the greenhouse or in the field this summer.
Gina believes that this is a very worthwhile effort. I tend to agree
with her, after my day in the field. We cannot have millions of people
visiting the meadows without some damage to the plants and the soil. But
we can learn ways to restore the meadows to a more natural condition.
The combination of the greenhouse and improved groundcovers offer us the
chance to replace some of the beauty which can be degraded through human
and environmental impacts. Let's give a hand to those who helped with
planting projects in the meadows. . .or, better yet--offer them your own
hands and help out!
Sheri Fedorchak
1986 UPDATE
Monitoring of 1985 greenhouse transplants revealed approximately 16%
mortality at Myrtle Falls vs 5% elsewhere in the park. High mortality
rates are attributed to grazing by marmots.
Eleven plants died in the monitoring plots, 10 lupines and 1 sedge.
This information will help us develop site-specific planting guidelines
for future revegetation sites.
Gina Rochefort