THE MAMMALS
GRIZZLY BEAR. Ursus henshawi Merriam
The history of the Grizzly Bear in the Yosemite
region and indeed throughout California is evidently a closed chapter in
the book of nature. In the "days of '49" numbers of the big fellows
roamed over the hills and valleys of California, and the Yosemite region
doubtless had its full quota of them. But the presence of the Grizzlies
was incompatible with the interests of the white man, and so they were
killed off rapidly, until now it seems likely that they are entirely
gone. So sudden was their extermination that no complete specimens were
secured to be preserved in our museums. And reliable accounts, published
or in manuscript, of the California grizzlies are meager at best.
The word Yosemite3 is derived from a word
in the tribal dialect of the southern Miwok Indians who inhabited the
Valley when it was discovered by white men. This word, Uzumati, or
Uzhumati, means grizzly bear, a full-grown animal rather than a cub. The
use of this name in association with the Valley might be taken as an
indication that Grizzly Bears originally inhabited the Yosemite Valley.
But we have no precise evidence to show that such was the case. Early
visitors to the Yosemite often mention and "bears" in their narratives,
but with an ambiguity that leaves the reader uncertain as to whether a
veritable Grizzly was encountered anywhere in the Valley proper.
The names Bear Valley, Bear Creek, Big Grizzly Flat,
and Little Grizzly attest the former wide occurrence of Grizzly Bears in
the foothill district of the region.
3For the circumstances
surrounding the choice of the name consult L. H. Bunnell, Discovery
of the Yosemite; for discussion of the meaning of the word see paper
by A. L. Kroeber, California Place Names of Indian Origin (Univ. Calif.
Publ. Am. Arch. Ethn., vol. 12 [1916], p. 68).
The Grizzly Bears as a group (including several
species and races) are quite distinct from the Black Bears. The size of
adults was generally much larger, though the species which occurred in
the Yosemite region was one of the smaller of the grizzlies. No weights
or detailed measurements of locally captured grizzles are preserved. The
"nose to tail" measurement of "nearly 10 feet" given by its captor for
the Wellman specimen referred to below, applied to a skin as pegged out
fresh. It is well known that considerable stretching results from such
procedure, and that when the skin is relaxed and tanned it shrinks
somewhat. The length of the Wellman grizzly skin is now 7-1/2 feet and
its width at the middle is 5 feet. Judging from the dimensions of bears
before skinning, in known cases, as compared with those of the tanned
skins measured subsequently, the Wellman bear in the flesh probably
measured between 6-1/2 and 7 feet in length, tip of nose to tip of tail.
The Washburn skin mentioned later measures 6 feet 7 inches in length,
somewhat smaller; and the living animal was therefore probably close to
6 feet long.
The foreclaws of the Grizzly are much less sharply
curved and somewhat longer than those of the Black Bear; this is an
absolutely distinctive character. The longest claws on the Wellman skin
are 3 inches (measuring the chord of the claw from tip to upper base),
while the middle foreclaw of a large California-taken Black Bear is only
2 inches in the same dimension. The track of an old Grizzly, either
front or hind foot, was much larger than that of a Black Bear. Wellman's
figures, 10 by 13 inches, and McLean's, 9 by 17 inches (even allowing
for considerable sliding of the foot, especially in the latter case) are
50 per cent larger in each dimension than the track of a good-sized
Black Bear. These measurements of course refer to the hind foot, which
is decidedly longer than the forefoot. The latter (if the 'wrist' does
not touch) leaves an imprint that is more nearly square in outline. In
coloration the Grizzly was dark brown, and some individuals had grayish
or whitish ends to the longer guard-hairs on the back, which gave rise
to the name "silver-tip."
The Grizzly differed from the Black Bear in habits as
well as in structure. It was, particularly in the case of the Henshaw
Grizzly, a frequenter of chaparral (and hence essentially an inhabitant
of the foothill districts), and it never (or rarely) climbed trees. Its
food, as with the Black Bear, was quite varied, including berries,
fruits, and insects, as well as flesh; but the Grizzly worked much more
havoc among large game, and in later years, stock, than does its smaller
relative.
During our work in the western part of the Yosemite
section we questioned numerous old residents concerning the former
occurrence of Grizzly Bears, but rarely obtained definite information.
Mr. J. B. Varain, of Pleasant Valley (= Varain), told us that there were
no Grizzlies there when he arrived in 1867, but that they were then
still to be found in the territory to the east. The various gold rushes
to Tioga and Mammoth, together with the running of sheep and other stock
in the region, served to clear the Yosemite country of its Grizzlies at
a relatively early date. The occurrence of the one taken in 1887, by
Wellman, was by that year considered an unusual event.
We were unable to get track of even a fragment of a
specimen of the Grizzly in the narrow section which we worked across the
Sierras; but since our field work was completed, there have come to
light two skins of Grizzlies killed elsewhere within the present
boundaries of Yosemite National Park. Both of these skins are now in the
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology of the University of California. One of
these bears (obtained from Mrs. John S. Washburn) is the last known to
have been killed in the region. It was shot "about 1895" at Crescent
Lake, which lies some ten miles air-line east of Wawona at an altitude
of 8500 feet.
It is possible that a few individuals persisted in
the same region until a considerably later date. This surmise is
strengthened by the following account. Mr. John L. McLean and his son
Donald have told us that during the fall and winter months from 1908
until 1911 a very large bear lived on Bullion Mountain. The tracks,
which were examined on two or more occasions in two successive years,
"were 9 by 17 inches (or a little more) by actual measurement." The
animal had long claws, as shown by the tracks. The bear had five
separate trails leading up the side of the mountain from the heavy
chaparral (composed of Adenostoma and scrub or "vine" oak) on the
lower slopes, to the black and blue oaks on the top. The dung indicated
that the bear was living principally upon acorns. There were wild hogs
on the mountain and these may have been an attraction to the big bear.
The smaller (Black) bears seemingly had little or nothing to do with the
big fellow, avoiding his trails and staying off in another cañon.
A trap was once set for the big bear, and caught him; but he pulled
loose "at one jump." Finally a party of men with dogs got after the big
bear and it "left the country," without being injured, and was not seen
again. Small bears are still present in the region.
The circumstances surrounding the killing of the
"Wellman bear" have been set down at considerable length in a letter
written by one of the principals, Mr. Robert S. Wellman, under date of
April 20, 1918. This letter is now on file at the Museum of Vertebrate
Zoology, and from it we take the following.
Mr. Wellman's headquarters were, at that time, at
Buck Camp, some 16 miles east of Wawona, near the South Fork of the
Merced River. On the evening of October 17, 1887, at the head of a small
valley about a mile away from the camp, he discovered the carcass of a
cow on which bears had already commenced to feed. A search of the
vicinity disclosed the presence of a female Black Bear and three
cubs.
The next morning Mr. Wellman visited the place again
and found that during the night a larger bear had come and dragged the
carcass several yards from where it first lay. Being certain that this
new arrival was a veritable Grizzly he rode over to the camp of his
friend Jim Duncan,4 now long deceased, and got him to come
over to help in the hunt. The two men built a scaffold, or platform, 10
feet above the ground and some 60 feet from the dead cow. And on this
platform watch was kept for the succeeding three nights. One or more
black bears and a coyote came to feed, but it was not until the third
night that the big bear put in its appearance again. When it did, it
happened that three small bears were at the carcass; but these quickly
quit the vicinity when the large bear appeared. Finally, the Grizzly
caught sight of the scaffold, and made toward it. The two men fired
simultaneously and the bear fell to earth with a series of 'bawls,'
evidently wounded. The men did not come down until daylight, when the
animal was found in some bushes and killed by a shot behind the ear.
4This is in all
probability the same Duncan mentioned by John Muir in the chapter on
"The Animals of the Yosemite" in his book, Our National Parks (see
Bibliography, p. 667). Muir relates that Duncan, who had quite a
reputation locally as a bear hunter, had a cabin on the shore of
Crescent Lake. In nine years he had killed no less than 49 bears
[probably both Black and Grizzly]. He kept count of his killings by
"notches cut on one of the timbers of his cabin." Crescent Lake is but a
short distance from Buck Camp, and Duncan was doubtless living there in
1887 when Wellman went to get his assistance.
The skin of this bear was sold by Mr. Wellman to the
artist, Thomas Hill, and, through the latter's son-in-law, was procured
in 1918 for the University of California.
|