Folk Hero
He hated the radio; he called it a "lemon." He had
even less use for the electronic phonograph. In 1925 he sounded the
death knell for the Edison name in the home phonograph industry by
saying he would stick with his mechanical device. After much stubborn
hesitation, his company brought out an electronic phonograph in 1928.
But it was too late. In 1929 the Edison company stopped manufacturing
entertainment phonographs and records. A last-minute venture into the
mushrooming radio field failed soon afterwards.
Thomas Alva Edison belonged to the 19th century. It
was there, in the beginnings of America's love affair with technology,
that the dynamic and sharp-tongued "country boy" from Milan, Ohio, put
his extraordinary genius to work and achieved national fame. In that age
before the horseless carriage and wireless Thomas Edison made his
remarkable contribution to the quality of life in America and became a
folk hero, much like an Horatio Alger character.
Edison's reputation stayed with him in the early 20th
century, but his pace of achievements slackened. At his laboratory in
West Orange, N.J., in the 1900's he did not produce as many important
inventions as he had there and at his Menlo Park, N.J., lab in the late
1800's. Edison's projects and quests became expensive, costing millions
and resulting in few rewards and profits. His forays into many fields
were continuing evidence of a Da Vinci-like breadth of mind, but they
were not financially successful, or, one suspects, personally
satisfying. Besides some financial success with a battery, it was
profits from the phonograph and motion picture innovations, both fruits
of his work in the 19th century, that kept Edison solvent in those later
years.
His last major effort was devoted to finding a
domestic source of rubber. When the British acted in 1924 to restrict
the supply of Malayan raw rubber, Edison's camping caravan partners,
Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone, pleaded with him to find a practical
domestic source. A long-term rubber shortage might mean disaster for
both tycoons of the motorcar world. Their plea was a godsend (perhaps
not in Edisonian theology) to a bored and somewhat jaded inventor. Here
was a problem he could tackle with the exhaustive empirical method that
had made him the "Wizard of Menlo Park." To find the right tree or plant
was going to be "search, try, and discard" all the way. This was not a
task for theorists and mathematicians whom Edison scorned; this was a
task which fit, to some degree, the Edison definition of genius as
"ninety-nine per cent perspiration and one percent inspiration." This
was a task which required that rare Edison combination of imagination,
brilliance, and dogged determination exemplified in his successful quest
for a practical incandescent lamp in 1879. The man of practical physics
and electrical engineering became a botanist almost overnight. Suddenly
everything was rubberat home and at the lab. The Old Man was
happy.
A new company, the Edison Botanic Research
Corporation, was formed, and, with grants of $93,500 each from Firestone
and Ford, was on its way by the fall of 1927. Edison began this
adventure at his Fort Myers, Fla., home and lab, where he customarily
spent some of the winter. At both his Florida and New Jersey labs he put
a new staff of botanists and chemists to work. He sent agents to every
corner of the tropical and temperate zones to look for vines, bushes,
trees, shrubs, and weeds that might hold latex juices.
After two years Edison could report that he had
tested more than 14,000 different plants of which about 600 contained
latex to some degree. He believed that goldenrod was the most promising
and narrowed his focus to that weed of countless road sides, abandoned
lots, and rural fields across America. Edison felt that he was on the
track of finding a source of domestic rubber that was "sowable and
mowable." He took the best varieties and began crossbreeding. In the end
he developed a goldenrod variety about 14 feet tall and yielding 12
percent latex. His goal was to produce 100 to 150 pounds of rubber per
acre of goldenrod.
As Henry Ford and Francis Jehl look on, Edison
reenacts the making of the first successful incandescent lamp. The event
took place in Dearborn, Mich., on October 21, 1929, the 50th anniversary
of the lamp and the dedication of Edison's reconstructed Menlo Park
laboratory.
|
Little did he realize that his project was futile.
He made rubber from goldenrod, and Firestone even made four tires out of
it, but it was expensive rubber and of inferior quality. And meanwhile,
German scientists were successfully producing a synthetic rubber from
coal tars.
If anyone, Ford and Firestone included, had any
suspicions that Edison's experiments would not succeed, they didn't tell
him. Edison probably would not have listened anyway.
Thomas A. Edison was dying. He had been suffering for
years from diabetes, Bright's disease, and a gastric ulcer. Uremia
almost took him in 1929, when he was 82. But, as always, he tried to
work. When in bed, his assistants kept him informed of progress in the
rubber experiments.
In the summer of 1931 his afflictions brought him
near death. He rallied for a short time, but he suffered a relapse and
died on October 18.
Edison was gone and with him an epoch in American
science and technology. He had been truly a "legend in his time."
Medals, busts, and ribbons, Edison claimed bushels of them, including
one from Congress. Henry Ford paid him perhaps the greatest tribute by
reconstructing, in Dearborn, Mich., Edison's old Menlo Park lab with
virtually all the paraphernaliabulbs, dynamos, apparatus,
machinery, materials, buildingsof his early years as an
inventor.
What kind of man was this hero of several generations
of Americans? He was not the saintly figure of the many bronze busts and
news articles of his day. And yet he was much more than "just a country
boy" full of folksy sayings and homilies and the victim of urbane and
unprincipled robber barons, the way he liked to picture himself: He
survived and often triumphed in the patent quarrels, litigation, and
vicious infighting that were characteristic of those
survival-of-the-fittest years.
He had an uncanny knack for drama. P. T. Barnum could
have learned something from Edison. The Old Man was a born promoter as
well as creative genius, and, unlike many of his contemporaries, he was
an attractive personality to much of America. We was a small town boy
who had made good, and the folks of the day loved to see their ways of
practicality and down-to-earth grit put the professors and foreigners to
shame. Self education and the American backwater environment were, as in
Abraham Lincoln's life, superbly vindicated in Edison. Through the
newspapers, he prepared the people for greater things to come. And if
the bluster and ballyhoo did not square with results and performance, as
with his target date for a workable lighting-distribution system, the
people did not seem to mind.
The men who labored with and for this man of
fantastic drive were smitten with the drama of science. They had to be.
With what Edison paid, something else must have sustained them working
twice as long each day as their deodorized, white-coated, 40-hour-a-week
counterparts of the 1970's. They saw a side of the Old Man that the
adoring public rarely viewedprofane, grossly unkempt, and with an
uncertain temper. But there was a charisma about the man that inspired
loyalty and sacrifice.
Science and technology became America's new frontier
during the most creative and dynamic years of Edison's life. It was no
coincidence.
|