Volume XXVIII - 1997
Crater Lake in Indian Tradition: Sacred Landscapes and Cultural Survival
By Robert H. Winthrop
Introduction
Crater Lake and its environs served a range of uses for the Klamath,
Upper Umpqua, and other Indian peoples of the region. The area of what
is now Crater Lake National Park was used for both hunting and
gathering. Huckleberry Mountain, an important gathering site for the
Klamath, lies about ten miles southwest of the lake. Nonetheless, the
primary significance of Crater Lake appears to have been as a place of
power and peril, renowned as a spirit quest site, yet also feared for
the dangerous beings residing in the lake. In short, Crater Lake
constituted a sacred landscape, that is, a region distinguished in the
traditions of a people by its special spiritual qualities or
powers.1
The aim of this paper is to make such an alien reality somewhat more
intelligible, both as a matter of cultural interest, and for its
relevance to the sensitive management of this remarkable national park.
I argue that there are, in fact, significant parallels as well as
dramatic differences in Anglo-American and Indian perceptions of such
sacred landscapes. Such a comparison can suggest both the degree of
common concern for such geographies of refuge and transcendence, and
what we as Anglo-Americans could usefully learn from the far more
nuanced and complex appreciation of such landscapes inherent in Indian
traditions.
Nature as sublime experience
Given the numerous controversies which have arisen since the 1970s
over proposed development of lands viewed by Indian peoples as sacred or
culturally sensitive, it is worth emphasizing that Anglo-American
culture has also seen in nature an avenue for spiritual
experience.2 The romantic movement, in particular, strongly
influenced the perception of wilderness in nineteenth century America.
Denis Cosgrove, in his interesting study of society and symbolic
landscapes, noted that in America,
...by the 1820s and 1830s the idea of romantic landscape had invested
scenes of wild grandeur with a special significance. They were held by
many to be places which declared the great forces of nature, the hand of
the creator.... In the context of a religious tradition which stressed
individual salvation, the idea of sublime wilderness offered a powerful
opportunity for transcendence, a way of appropriating America as a
distinctive experience unavailable in Europe.3
Crater Lake, first encountered by Anglo-American travelers in the
1850s, admirably fulfilled the desire for a sublime and inspiring
experience of nature. Captain Franklin Sprague, describing his visit in
1865, spoke of the lake's "majestic beauties" and "awful
grandeur."4 Clarence Dutton remarked in 1886 on the emotional
reaction which the lake aroused in its visitors:
It was touching to see the worthy but untutored people, who had
ridden a hundred miles in freight-wagons to behold it, vainly striving
to keep back tears as they poured forth their exclamations of wonder and
joy akin to pain.5
John Wesley Powell, writing in 1888 in support of a bill to create a
national park to protect Crater Lake, argued,
The lake itself is a unique object, as much so as Niagara, and the
effect which it produces upon the mind of the beholder is at once
powerful and enduring. There are probably not many natural objects in
the world which impress the average spectator with so deep a sense of
the beauty and majesty of nature.6
Similarly, Mark Daniels, former General Superintendent of the
National Parks, said of Crater Lake:
The sight of it fills one with more conflicting emotions than any
other scene with which I am familiar. It is at once weird, fascinating,
enchanting, repellent, of exquisite beauty and at times terrifying in
its austere-dignity [sic] and oppressing stillness.7
Enraptured by the sublime: a 19th century visitor at
the rim. Peter Britt photo, 1874. Southern Oregon Historical
Society #704, Medford.
What is particularly intriguing about these expressions of
geopiety to borrow a term from the geographer Yi-Fu Tuan -- is
the way in which they manifest both strong similarities and differences
with the Indian experience of the Crater Lake region. The similarities
lie in the common recognition of an encounter with the alien, the weird,
and the numinous in this ancient caldera. Yet the differences are also
telling. For the American explorers and settlers, the encounter with
Crater Lake appears to have yielded a deep emotional response, but not a
deeper knowledge or transformation of self. Such testimonies as these
suggest an awareness of the sacred, but it is a mute awareness, a matter
of mood. Unlike the Indian visitors to Crater Lake, the Anglo-American
travelers lacked the cultural models -- the cognitive templates
encompassing mythology, ritual practices, and knowledge of localized
spirit beings -- which allow such encounters to yield a message, to
produce lasting understanding and personal change.
This bafflement in the face of mute nature is captured well in a
passage from the modern nature writer Edward Abbey. Of his travels in
the American Southwest, he says,
I consider the tree, the lonely cloud, the sandstone bedrock on this
part of the world and pray -- in my fashion -- for a vision of truth. I
listen for signals from the sun, but that distant music is too high and
pure for the human ear.8
Nature as sacred landscape
The Indian conception of Crater Lake was a matter of much comment by
travelers and settlers of the region. The Portland Oregonian
reported in 1886 that,
There is probably no point of interest in America that so completely
overcomes the ordinary Indian with fear as Crater lake. From time
immemorial no power has been strong enough to induce them to approach
within sight of it. For a paltry sum they will engage to guide you
thither, but before reaching the mountain top will leave you to proceed
alone. To the savage mind it is clothed with a deep veil of mystery and
is the abode of all manner of demons and unshapely
monsters.9
Similarly, George Kirkman, writing in Harper's Weekly in
1896, described the small island in the lake known as the Phantom Ship
as "a fantastic object of unspeakable dread to the Klamath
Indians."10 These accounts, however exaggerated and in part
factually incorrect, do convey a sense of Crater Lake and its environs
as an area set apart, in some fashion fundamentally different in quality
from the wider region, the southern Oregon Cascades.
For the Klamath, spirit power could be found in many
sources.11 The spiritual significance of gi-was, or
Crater Lake, reflected a more general Klamath understanding of the
natural world, involving not only reverence but the possibility of
significant interaction with particular mountains, lakes, and streams,
as an individual sought comfort, assistance, or power.12 As
one Klamath woman commented in the late 1940s:
...those old Indians had a lot of sense. They kind of felt at home
around here and they would get a lift from just talking to the mountains
and lakes. It was like praying and it made them feel at
peace.13
In a sense features in a sacred landscape are persons: one can enter
into relationships with them. A Klamath woman about 80 years old,
paralyzed and bedridden, said:
Every day I pray to the mountain. I lie here in my bed and I am sick
and old and every morning I say to those mountains, I say, "Bless me,
help me." I pray just like my mother taught me to do.... My mother
taught me to pray to rocks and mountains and to give some food to them
before we eat. It's just like in the Bible. I dream of those mountains
at night. They kind of help you when you ask it.14
The elements of a sacred landscape derive their power in part from a
net of symbolic associations accruing from myth. Crater Lake figures
prominently in the myth of Le*w and Sqel. Le*w is "the monster who
dwells in Crater Lake .... rather octopoidal and of a dirty white
color."15 The myth relates his battle with Sqel (who also
appears as Old Marten or Old Mink), a culture transformer in Klamath
tradition, "teaching subsistence techniques, and generally preparing the
world for the myth age humans."16
The myth opens with Sqel/Mink/Old Marten and his friend Weasel. They
are tricked by the beautiful but wicked daughter of Le*w, who
ingratiates herself with Mink (or in an alternate version, Weasel), and
tears out his heart. She then takes the heart to Le*w's people at Crater
Lake, who play ball with it. Weasel runs for help to Gmokamc, the
Klamath creator figure, who advises Weasel, and then proceeds with the
help of various allies to recover Mink's heart. Mink revives, but Le*w
now carries him off to Crater Lake, and is about to cut him to pieces
and feed him to his children, the crawfish. However, Mink outwits Le*w
and slays him, cutting up his body and (pretending the pieces belong to
Mink's own corpse) feeding them to the crawfish. Finally Mink throws
Le*w's head into Crater Lake, naming it correctly. In Theodore Stern's
translation of a version narrated by Herbert Nelson:
Then he [Mink] threw into the water all this, heart,
windpipe-and-lungs, and liver. "Here's Mink's heart, windpipe-and-lungs,
and liver!" Now the Crawfish came and ate all that. "Then here's
Lao's [Le*w's] head!" Bawak! sound of head splashing into
the water. The Crawfish recognizing their father scattered in all
directions. Then that head of Lao's lodged there. This is Wizard
Island.17
While Anglo-American travelers' claims that Indians did not visit
Crater Lake are false, the area was certainly regarded as the abode of
powerful spirits. Traditionally, gaining a vision of such beings was a
major goal of the spirit quest.18 The seeker would often swim
at night, underwater, to encounter the spirits lurking in the depths of
the lake.19 Leslie Spier commented regarding the father of
one of his informants, "having lost a child, he went swimming in Crater
lake; before evening he had become a shaman."20 The quest for
such spirits required courage and resolution:
He must not be frightened even if he sees something moving under the
water. He prays before diving, 'I want to be a shaman. Give me power.
Catch me. I need the power.'21
One Klamath woman recounted seeing a spirit being on the lake:
When I was young, I went up to Crater Lake with a woman I knew. She
tied my eyes and led my horse.... Then she said, "Untie your eyes," and
I nearly fell off the horse. I saw a man standing on the water far away,
just like in the Bible. He scared me so, I don't know who that was, but
I like to think of that man now.22
Individuals undertook strenuous and dangerous climbs along the
caldera wall. Some would run, starting at the western rim and running
down the wall of the crater to the lake. One who could reach the lake
without falling was thought to have superior spirit powers. Sometimes
such quests were undertaken by groups. Rocks were often piled as feats
of endurance and evidence of spiritual effort. Four of the five
prehistoric sites thus far identified at the park are in fact piled rock
sites. Here as elsewhere, such sites are usually built on peaks or
ridges, with fine views. Leslie Spier reported one such named site built
on a point of rock projecting from the western wall of the lake. Today
Crater Lake remains important as a site for power quests and other
spiritual pursuits, particularly for members of the Klamath Tribe.
Conclusions
To recapitulate: what has been termed here a sacred landscape
entails a correlation of physical place and cultural meaning, existing
within a larger body of tradition. Its physical elements (a piled rock
site, Wizard Island, the lake bottom) have associations with various
culturally postulated events, some in a mythic time, others occurring
still today. Those who share traditional knowledge of a landscape such
as Crater Lake bring to the encounter culturally patterned expectations
which shape experience, form symbolic associations, and allow lasting
experiential value to be gained.
Llao, chief spirit of Crater Lake, controlled many
lesser spirits who appeared in the shape of animals. One such monster
was a giant crayfish who could pluck unwary visitors from the crater rim
and drag them down to the dark, chilling depths. NPS drawing, Harpers
Ferry Center.
|
Under such circumstances the tenacity with which many Indian tribes
struggle to preserve their sacred landscapes is understandable, for such
areas offer the possibility of sustaining tradition and identity, thus
linking the future with the past. The attempt by Karok, Yurok, and other
Northwest California peoples to preserve the "High Country" of Del Norte
County from logging -- the so-called G-O Road case, fought all the way
to the U.S. Supreme Court -- offers a recent example (see Lyng v.
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439
[1988]).
Within contemporary Anglo-American culture, there is evidence of a
collective effort to discover or create such sacred landscapes. The
ethos of sublime nature -- which a century ago moved the "worthy but
untutored" visitors to Crater Lake to tears -- is apparently no longer
sufficient. Today Anglo-Americans are rather ingenuously urged to seek
out "sacred places" culled from the most diverse
traditions.23 The acts of the more radical environmental
movements (for example, those defending old growth forest); and the
vague nature mysticism, coupled with imitation of things Indian, which
suffuses many popular therapies -- men's groups taking to the woods to
sharpen spears and chant -- likewise seem directed toward fashioning
sacred places within an increasingly disenchanted world. Whether it is
culturally feasible deliberately to create ritual, myth, and sacred
landscapes remains to be seen.
This paper has benefited significantly from the assistance of
Gordon Bettles, Director of the Cultural Heritage Program, Klamath Tribe
(Chiloquin, Oregon); and from Sue Shaffer, Chair of the Cow Creek Band
of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (Canyonville, Oregon). Part of the material
presented here is taken from a cultural resource overview of Crater Lake
National Park, prepared for the National Park Service (Contract
CX-9000-9-P013). Support by the NPS, and in particular James Thomson and
Fred York of the Seattle Office, is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes
1 Regarding sacred space or sacred landscape, see chapter
one in Mircea Eliade (Willard R. Trask, trans.), The Sacred and the
Profane: the Nature of Religion (New York: Harcourt, Brace &
World, 1959); Linda Grabner, Wilderness as Sacred Space
(Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, 1976); Yi-Fu Tuan,
Geopiety: A Theme in Man's Attachment to Nature and to Place, in
David Lowenthal and Martyn J. Bowden (eds.), Geographies of the
Mind (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976); and Deward E.
Walker, Jr., Protecting American Indian Sacred Geography, Northwest
Anthropological Research Notes22 (1988), pp. 253-66.
2 Diane Brazen Gould, The First Amendment and the
American Indian Religious Freedom Act: An Approach to Protecting Native
American Religion, Iowa Law Review 11 (1986), pp. 869-91; Richard W.
Stoffle and Michael J. Evans, Holistic Conservation and Cultural
Triage: American Indian Perspectives on Cultural Resources, Human
Organization 49 (1990), pp. 91-99.
3 Cosgrove, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape
(Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 1984), p. 185.
4 Linda W. Greene, Historic Resource Study: Crater Lake
National Park, Oregon (Denver: USDI-NPS, 1984), p. 271.
5 Harlan D. Unrau, Administrative History, Crater Lake
National Park, Oregon (Denver: USDI-NPS, 1988), p. 32.
6 Ibid., p. 33.
7 Ibid., p. 233
8 Grabner, p. 44.
9 Green, p. 28.
10 Ibid., p. 29
11 Robert F. Spencer, Native Myth and Modern Religion
among the Klamath Indians, Journal of American Folklore 65
(1952), pp. 217-26.
12 M.A.R. Barker, Klamath Directory, University of
California Publications in Linguistics 31 (Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1963), p. 145.
13 Spencer, p. 223.
14 Ibid., p. 222.
15 Barker, p. 215.
16 Ibid., p. 389.
17 Theodore Stem, trans., [Myth of] Crater Lake (Lao's
Daughter), narrated in Klamath by Herbert Nelson, 1951. MS on file at
Crater Lake National Park.
18 Spencer, p. 222.
19 Leslie Spier, Klamath Ethnography, University of
California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 30
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1930), p. 98.
20 Ibid., p. 96.
21 Ibid.
22 Spencer, p. 222.
23 James A. Swan, Sacred Places: How the Living Earth
Seeks Our Friendship (Santa Fe, NM: Bear & Co., 1990).
|