NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Park Structures and Facilities
|
|
DAMS and CROSSINGS
ALTHOUGH it is an inviolate principle, with respect
to National Parks and Monuments, that artificial control of stream flow
is to be rigidly avoided, the situation with respect to State Parks is
somewhat different. While it is felt that in some cases such artificial
control has been exerted to the detriment of valuable natural conditions
without creating adequate compensatory values, there are undoubtedly
situations, such as that in which a serious regional shortage of
facilities for water recreation exists, which justify this sort of
modification of natural conditions. Those who feel that primary emphasis
should be placed on preservation of really natural scenery and on
historic values earnestly urge a careful weighing of all prospective
losses and gains before any decision is made to create an artificial
body of water in a State Park. Granting then the occasional wisdom of
such undertakings, simple naturalistic dams in which the objective in
construction is the appearance of a natural waterfall are considered
within the scope of this discussion.
The large dam is strictly an engineering problem and
will not be considered in the present volume. Anything short of the most
complete technical informationany skeletonized version possible
within present space limitationsmight prove more misinforming than
otherwise. Furthermore, the dam that is other than miniature waterfall,
has not so far proved very susceptible to coercive attempt to adapt its
stubborn functionalism to a harmony with natural environment. As with
telephone line and the incinerator, here is proper occasion for a
philosophical counting of blessings, and for blindness to incorrectible
artistic lack. The recreational and scenic benefits of a made lake must
alone be counted on to justify the alien dam, without reliance on any
feeble efforts to make the dam a parklike "feature." This, in a
development of any considerable size, it can never be. It is true that
large dams have been faced with stone to some softening of hard, rigid
surfaces and lines. But always the failure of the undertaking to
register anywhere near a perfect score has shown that the results have
not justified the means.
Even the small dam usually has a structural core
wall, of concrete or rubble, against and over which the "naturalism" is
applied as a veneer. Too frequently the rock veneer follows too closely
the regularity of the core wall, and betrays the fact that the dam is
artificial. This can be avoided if the veneer strives for irregularity
both in plan and in vertical section. The latter is accomplished by
building out the lower courses in imitation of natural ledges. Variety
in size of the rocks will add much to the natural appearance of the dam.
Likewise should construction insure distribution of water, so that as
much rock work as possible is screened by flow. To have all or any
considerable portion of the dam exposed during low water may unmask an
otherwise well-contrived naturalism.
If in our approach to park technique, the primitive
has the right of way, the crossing as a picturesque survival has a
place. For horse trails and even for secondary motor roads in parks
where traffic is leisurely and not too heavy in volume, the ford is a
legitimate and economical provision for crossing a shallow stream. This
is subject to further reservations if tolerance of its quaintness is not
to give way to annoyance on the part of the park user. The low water
crossing will not meet with favor if the stream is normally subject to
flood levels that make the crossing frequently impassable for
automobiles. Equally conducive to public disapproval are a soft stream
bed, treacherous holes or other hazards to safe negotiation. The
approaches must not incline too sharply, nor may sight lines, as the
ford is approached, be completely obscured by planting. Failure to
provide these requisites to public acceptance of the ford is apt to
provoke clamor of disapproval and lead to demands for its replacement
with a bridge, to the eventual voiding of the economy it was sought to
effect.
|
Plate F-1 (click on image for a PDF version)
|
|
Pittsfield Reservation, Massachusetts
A waterfall so natural in appearance that it brooks denial of all
artificiality. The small dam is naturalized with much greater success
than the large one.
|
|
almetto State Park, Texas
Here are rock ledges in series that have but little
trace of other than natural origin. The rock-edged banks are well
contrived to tie in with the stepped breaks underlying the water
course.
|
|
Boyle State Park, Arkansas
When the flow of water over a man-made waterfall
promises to be meager, an arrangement of large rocks, between which the
flow can be concentrated at a few points, is a good solution. This is
much more effective than an attenuated dribble of water the entire
length of the dam.
|
|
Plate F-2 (click on image for a PDF version)
|
|
Buttermilk Falls State Park, New York
Skillfully naturalized as this example of artificial
barrier to stream flow may be, the choice of location for it is an
unhappy one. Backing up water to the base of a beautiful natural falls
to create a swimming pool, it depreciates sadly the beauty of the
natural falls, although not to such degree that the artificial one adds
to its own glory by contrast.
|
|
Turner Falls State Park, Oklahoma
The natural aspect of this considerable bit of
nature-faking seems very genuine. There is a uniform distribution of
water that conceals well any evidence of the barrier being artificial.
At low water the origin of the obstruction will probably be revealed,
unless the construction is exceedingly clever in every detail.
|
|
Bastrop State Park, Texas
The heavy flow of water here pictured screens the
rock work of this barrier from the critical eye. Naturalized dams are
best photographed at high water stage; their construction best analyzed
and appraised during drought. The rockwork terminating the barrier at
the banks is effective.
|
|
Plate F-3 (click on image for a PDF version)
|
|
Crossing, Turner Falls State Park, Oklahoma
A dam, built wide enough to provide a crossing and
showing a well-naturalized facing wall. The road surface is paved with
flagstone laid with wide joints, which accommodate the flow of
considerable volume of water and afford more frequently a dry surface
for crossing.
|
|
Flood-over Type Bridge, Boyle State Park, Arkansas
Here a suggestion of a dam is surmounted by a low
stone bridge of somewhat formal design. This illustration and the one
that follows demonstrate stages in the evolution of dam into bridge.
|
|
Low Water Bridge, Palmetto State Park, Texas
A low-lying structure that is bridge at low water,
and ford at flood stage. It is strictly a utility, reflecting nothing of
its park surroundings. The scale of the bridge as shown by this
illustration is apt to be misleading until the human figure is taken
into account.
|
park_structures_facilities/secf.htm
Last Updated: 5-Dec-2011
|