ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION Summary Seven landscape characteristics assessed for this report have retained high degrees of integrity and contribute to the historic character of the landscape. Archeology, buildings and structures, cluster arrangement, natural systems and features, spatial organization, topography, and views and vistas all played an important role in the historic events and remain in context on the landscape. The defense structures in the archeology section fall into the category of archeological sites and are considered significant and contribute to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. The predominant buildings and structures found at the War in the Pacific National Historical Park are Japanese defense structures. These structures played a significant role in the history of the U.S. Military effort to recapture Guam. Since the 1940s, these structures have undergone weathering, however, they have retained integrity and are considered significant and contribute to the historic scene. The cluster arrangement of Japanese defense positions retains integrity and is contributing to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. Natural systems and features played a significant role during the U.S. Military effort in Guam. Most notable, within the two beach units are five coral outcrops. Adelup Point and Asan Point flank both sides of Asan Beach, and Apaca and Bangi points flank Agat Beach with Ga'an Point located centrally in Agat Beach Unit. The Japanese focused on the enhancements of the natural caves and crevices. Defensive pillboxes, bunkers, and gun emplacements were clustered within these outcroppings and became strongholds for the Japanese defense. The spatial organization, of the historic and existing landscape, shows a clustering and clear relationship between the buildings and structures and the natural topography. Vegetation within both beach units has also contributes to the historic integrity. The five coral outcroppings retain the patches of limestone forests that hid Japanese defense structures from aerial and ground reconnaissance. These structures then became strongholds and impacted offensive landing and maneuvers. Coconut groves along the beaches have changed in regards to their densities and no longer retain integrity. The spatial organization of the Asan and Agat battlefields were most influenced by the natural terrain. Both the offensive and defensive military strategies were planned around the existing landscape and the five limestone outcrops on Asan and Agat beaches. The spatial relationship between the coral reefs, beaches and coastal plains and the organization of the U.S. and Japanese military strategies that influenced the outcome of the recapture of Guam is still intact and contributing to the historic scene. The spatial relationship of the Japanese defense structures in the five coral outcroppings (Adelup, Asan, Apaca, Ga'an and Bangi points) are also still intact and contribute to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. Topography played a crucial role in the American offensive and Japanese defensive strategy. Changes to the topography since the period of significance have been minimal. As a result, topography in Asan and Agat beach units continues to remain significant and contributing to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. The historically significant views that were crucial in the military strategy and actual battle were longrange views from the sea and beaches toward high ground and vice-versa, short-range views from the sea toward the beaches and vice-versa, and short-range views in between the five points (Adelup, Asan, Apaca, Ga'an and Bangi). These views influenced the location of communication stations, gun emplacements, and other military strategies. Today, these views are still clear and contribute to the historic integrity of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. The seven characteristics that retain a high degree of historic integrity and contribute to the historic significance of Asan and Agat invasion beaches are archeology, buildings and structures, cluster arrangement, natural systems and features, spatial organization, topography, and views and vistas. All of these characteristics have played a significant role in and contribute to the historic events of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park. Landscape Characteristics And Features Archeological Sites The arrival of the first inhabitants of the Mariana Islands occurred about 3,000 years ago, as documented by archaeological excavations in Saipan. Present evidence does not support prehistoric occupation of Guam prior to about 2,500 to 3,000 years ago (Olmo 1995:13). Guam's prehistoric record is divided into two broad periods spanning the beginning of human settlement in the Mariana Islands (ca.1000 B.C. through European contact in A.D. 1521) the Pre-Latte and the Latte. The Latte period began ca. A.D. 800. Latte refers to stone columns found at many prehistoric living sites. They are hand hewn from nearby sources of coral, limestone, and volcanic rock. The columns are composed of two parts, an upright shaft and a hemispherical cap. They are usually found in groups, occurring in parallel rows, and are believed to be foundations for the floor beams of wooden houses. These houses most likely were those of high status individuals of the community (Olmo 1995:14-15). The Latte sites were for permanent habitation (as opposed to temporary habitation sites associated with the northern limestone forests of Guam). Desirable features included fertile soils for agriculture, and productive reef-lagoon habitats for fishing (Hunter-Anderson 1989:7). The Agat coastal area of Guam was characterized as having geographic attributes that offered desirable habitation sites during the Latte period. Pre-Latte sites indicate that the population, during initial phase of immigration and settlement, was located along coastal areas. The Hunter-Anderson study, done for the Small Boat Harbor at Agat, found no surface evidence of cultural remains. However, auger tests performed by Watanabe in 1986 indicated that pre-Latte subsurface remains might be yielded at Agat Beach. The "coral and sand beach overlie a substantial older intact alluvial clay deposit with localized evidence of prehistoric/early historic cultural remains" (Watanabe 1986:2). These remains may be non-residential but is a new site-type offering a model of prehistoric farming on Guam. The site may also offer recognition of a major geological event, during prehistoric human occupation on Guam, which caused the massive erosion evident in the deep alluvium at the Agat Beach study site (Hunter-Anderson 1989:27). The Small Boat Harbor study area is just south of the southernmost park boundary at Bangi Point. Although it is not within the boundaries, similar subsurface features are possible, if not probable, within the Agat Beach Unit. Guam's historic period can be divided into four occupational periods The Spanish Period (A.D. 1664-1898), the First American Period (1898-1941), the Japanese Occupation (1941-1944), and the Second American Period (1944). The Spanish Colonization period was well documented by Spanish government and military representatives, missionaries, and expeditionaries (Olmo 1995:16). Little material remains are present from the 234 years of Spanish occupation (Reed 1952:101). Many journals and written sources indicate that missionary efforts and Spanish settlement from 1668 mostly centered on Agana. However, the normal processes of time and vegetation growth along with the effects of typhoons and earthquakes have taken their toll on physical remains. But most destructive was the pre-bombing and battle of 1944. Archeological research identifies ruins of stone bridges and cathedrals to the north and south of NPS boundaries. No surface features from this period remain within Asan or Agat beach units. No sub-surface studies have been conducted within Asan or Agat beach units. The First American Period spans 43 years, from 1898, when America acquired Guam as part of the settlement after the Spanish American War, until 1941 when the Japanese invaded. During this period, improvements to infrastructure included better roads, new schools and expansion of the water system (Olmo 1995:17). The Asan Beach Unit land use varied from detention camps to a Navy hospital throughout the 43 years. The Japanese destroyed many American buildings after taking control of the island in 1941. During the Japanese occupation of Guam, little structural improvements were made. During the prebombing and battle of July 21 August 10, 1944, any remaining structures within the Asan or Agat beach units were destroyed. Today, the beach units of Asan and Agat contain only Japanese defense structures. These include gun positions, bunkers, caves, and an offshore latrine (Olmo 1995:75). Archeological studies have been done for Mt. Chachao (Olmo 1983), the Small Boat Harbor, Agat, (Hunter-Anderson 1989) and overviews of Guam (Reed 1952). Surveys done through the 1950s have focused primarily on the Pre-Latte and Latte Periods. Although no specific archeological studies have been done on Asan or Agat beach units, archeological investigations could yield subsurface information from WWII, prewar, Spanish, Latte, and Pre-Latte periods. Defense Structures When war looked imminent, the Japanese realized that they needed to plan a strategy and build defense structures. The decision to reinforce their position on the island had come so late (March 1944) that they had less than three months to prepare. General Takashina and his subordinates felt that between the lack of Japanese troops available, and the limited time period given to them for preparation, their situation was hopeless. Nevertheless, they began to build with the forced labor of the Chamorro people. There were critical shortages of cement, reinforcing steel, lumber, and a wide range of needed hardware, which limited the kinds of fortification that could be built (Gailey 1988:40). The defense structures included pillboxes, cave bunkers, tunnels, and gun emplacements. These structures varied from well-built concrete faced enclosures with multiple gun openings to crude and hurried concrete caps on holes dug in the dirt. However, some of these defense structures have lost integrity and are now contributing as archeological sites. These site numbers are 061, 062, 063, 064, 98, 102, 116, 032, 033, 023, 024 and 9 (see classified structure map). Japanese Emplacement (LCS 061) Japanese Emplacement (LCS 062) Asan Point Japanese Gun Emplacement (LCS 064) Asan Point Japanese Defensive Ridge Line (LCS 98) Asan Beach, Offshore Japanese Pillbox (LCS 102) Double Gun Emplacements on Asan Ridge (LCS 116) Adelup Point Cave and Foxhole (LCS 032) Chorrito Cliff Seawall along Asan Beach (LCS 033) Ga'an Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 024) Ga'an Point Bunker (LCS 023) Ga'an Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 9) Summary Considering the location of pre-Latte habitation sites along coastal areas, and the subsequent history of Spanish, Japanese, and American occupation, it can be assumed that Asan and Agat beach units would likely yield subsurface archeological information. Defense structures are contibuting as archeological sites and are considered significant to the historic scene at the War in the Pacific National Historical Park.
Buildings and Structures Pre-war Chamorro houses in Asan and Agat were wood and thatch construction. Only about a fourth of the homes had a cement foundation. Very few homes were "built of masonry with corrugated sheet-iron roofs" (Jennison-Nolan 1979). Pre-War bombing, invasion, and occupation episodes eliminated almost all pre-war buildings and structures throughout Guam, and especially at the Asan and Agat beach units. The only structures remaining on the landscape are associated with the war. These are predominantly defensive structures built by the Japanese. Defense Structures When war looked imminent, the Japanese realized that they needed to plan a strategy and build defense structures. The decision to reinforce their position on the island had come so late (March 1944) that they had less than three months to prepare. General Takashina and his subordinates felt that between the lack of Japanese troops available, and the limited time period given to them for preparation, their situation was hopeless. Nevertheless, they began to build with the forced labor of the Chamorro people. There were critical shortages of cement, reinforcing steel, lumber, and a wide range of needed hardware, which limited the kinds of fortification that could be built (Gailey 1988:40). The defense structures included pillboxes, cave bunkers, tunnels, and gun emplacements. These structures varied from well-built concrete faced enclosures with multiple gun openings to crude and hurried concrete caps on holes dug in the dirt. All of the structures within the Asan and Agat beach units take advantage of the natural terrain. Most structures are found in the five coastal outcrops that provided natural caves and crevices. These were enlarged and made to connect through a series of tunnels. Reinforced concrete and/or stone walls were added for support and cover the gun bases mounted inside. Heavy combat obliterated many of these defense structures, however many still remain within Asan and Agat beach areas. Very few structures were built upon the beaches. Only one remains offshore of Asan Beach, possibly discarded when American troops began organizing the beaches as supply bases. Some ingenious features or design techniques were added to structures. Some pillbox/caves had interior passages that extended from shoreline to ridge top. These were advantageous for attacking the first wave of American troops coming from ship to shore. Then, the Japanese would retreat through the caves up to the ridge top. After the cave appeared to be abandoned, and American troops felt secure ashore, the Japanese could return to the lower position and attack from behind. One pillbox was found to have a grenade-proof air vent that diverted any grenade through a shoot to deposit it outside of the pillbox. Other structures, clearly seen from troops advancing towards the shore, were thought to have been deliberately obvious to distract attention away from well-camouflaged strongholds. Many of the historic Japanese defense structures built in 1944 are in a state of deterioration from various factors including weather, erosion, vegetation, visitation, vandalism, structural deterioration, or inappropriate maintenance techniques. Vegetative root systems cause expansive pressure on cement structures and can cause the disconnection between stone and mortar. The cracks created from roots allow for water to penetrate into structures resulting in the leaching of limestone compromising strength and integrity of the structure. Structural assessments of these structures were recorded in three NPS reports: The List of Classified Structures (LCS) 1978-2000, the Emergency Super-Typhoon PAKA Report 1998, WAPA Historic Structure Storm Damage:1998, and the Cultural Resource Assessment of Historic WWII Sites 2003. As an aggregate, all of the structures contribute to the historic character of the cultural landscape. However, some structures lack individual physical integrity, or have been modified in a manner that effects integrity (such as the use of steel material for structural reinforcements because of roofs caving in). These structures are listed within the Archeological Section of this document. The remaining structures that retain integrity are listed in this section and remain a contributing feature to this historic scene. Asan Beach Unit from Asan Point to Adelup Point Adelup Point (LCS 042) Japanese Tunnel at Asan Point Ridgeline (LCS 106) 1961 Mabini Monument (LCS 045) 1964 Mabini Monument (LCS 052) 3rd Marine Division Association Monument (LCS MRKR1) War in the Pacific Park Plaque (LCS MRKR2) U.S. Landing Monument (LCS MRKR3) Civilian Landing Memorial (LCS MRKR4) Liberator's Memorial (Not on LCS) These monuments, plaques, and memorials listed above were built after the period of significance and are therefore non-contributing to the historic landscape. Agat Beach from Bangi Point to Apaca Point, including Ga'an Point Apaca Point Japanese Bunker with Tunnel (LCS 001) Apaca Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 002) Apaca Point Japanese Tunnel (LCS 103) Agat Japanese Cave (LCS 004) Rizal Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 005) Ga'an Point Latrine Foundation (LCS 007) Bangi Point Japanese Pillbox (LCS 10) Agat Beach Monument (not on LCS) U.S. Landing Monument (not on LCS) Summary Initial intents of commemorative monuments were to be separate from the actual historical park. As stated in the 1967 master plan proposal to Congress, for the War in the Pacific National Park: "There is no conflict between the proposal for a memorial, which would involve a site in Agana, near the Government House, and the historical park, which would involve lands primarily at Asan and Agat" (DOI 1967:1). Today, these monuments associated with the Asan and Agat beach landscapes do commemorate the events, but they are not from the period of significance, and are therefore noncontributing features of the cultural landscape. Sixty years after the liberation of Guam, battlefield structures remain within the Asan and Agat beach units. Although all of the structures listed in this section have undergone weathering since the 1940's, they are still considered to have integrity and are significant and contributing to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park.
Cluster Arrangement The U.S. Military pre-invasion bombardment varified for the Japanese that American forces would land and invade from Asan and Agat beaches (USMC 1998:14). Therefore, their arrangement of defensive positions clustered around the Orote Peninsula and the ridgelines and limestone outcrops that overlooked Asan and Agat beaches. These outcroppings, within the Asan and Agat beach areas, extended out into the bays providing perfect cover for pillboxes, caves, and gun emplacements. The pillboxes at the ridge-tops offered alternative views and positions. Caves extending from ridge-tops to the beach below allowed Japanese soldiers to position along the beach during the landing phase then retreat up to the ridgeline for perfect sniping positions. Today, most of the remaining structures are Japanese defense structures clustered within these ridge points; Bangi Point, Ga'an Point, and Apaca Point in the Agat Beach area, and Asan Point and Adelup Point in the Asan Beach area. The cluster arrangement of structures clearly retains the historic integrity of strategic positioning in relation to the natural terrain and to each other. Interpretive displays and signs are scattered throughout both beach units. Some gun emplacements are interpreted in original positions. Signs explaining the Japanese strongholds are also placed in relationship to site. Monuments and associated interpretive signs are scattered throughout both park units. Some are associated with and commemorative of WWII. Others are not. There is no specific clustering or formal arrangement of monuments in either Asan or Agat beach units. Cluster arrangement of the Japanese defense positions retains integrity and is contributing to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park.
wapa/cri/part3a.htm Last Updated: 03-May-2004 |