SAGUARO
Ecology of the Saguaro: II
NPS Scientific Monograph No. 8
|
|
CHAPTER 4:
ESTABLISHMENT AND SURVIVAL (continued)
Biotic Factors
Rodents and birds
Rodents are a major cause of first-year saguaro
mortality. In the absence of other sources of food and/or moisture, most
if not all of the species of rodents that occur commonly in the
principal saguaro habitats at Saguaro National Monument and elsewhere in
the Sonoran Desert will feed upon saguaro seedlings (Tables 13 and 14).
In addition to direct destruction by consumption, a substantial number
of young saguaros are uprooted or buried by intensive digging,
especially by the Harris and round-tailed ground squirrels.
TABLE 13. Consumption of saguaro seedlings by species of
rodents occurring commonly in saguaro habitats at Saguaro National
Monument.
All rodents, live-trapped during mid-summer 1971, were held in doors
without food or water for 24 hr prior to feeding. Each animal was then
provided with a single pot containing 15-day-old seedlings growing in
native soil. In every instance, all seedlings offered were eaten within
24 hr. These results are similar and not significantly different from
those of previous experiments. Experiments of similar design conducted
in the field laboratory at Navojoa with rodents from southern Sonora
(see Table 14) produced results similar to those obtained at Tucson,
Arizona.
|
Species |
Seedlings consumed
|
Digging activity (Soil disturbance) |
Hr | No. |
|
Spermophilus tereticaudus | 17 | 56 | overturned |
Citellus harrisi | 6 | 54 | overturned |
Neotoma albigula | 5 | 65 | slight |
Dipodomys merriami | 24 | 94 | overturned |
Perognathus baileyi | 9 | 33 | overturned |
Perognathus penicillatus | 24 | 24 | overturned |
Peromyscus eremicus | 24 | 6.0 | none |
|
TABLE 14. Native rodents and lagomorphs occurring in saguaro
habitats in the Mohave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and in thornscrub in
southwestern Sonora, Mexico. Grasshopper mice (Onychomys), cotton
rats (Sigmodon), and gophers (Thomomys) are not
listed.
|
Speciesa |
Subspecies in area of
|
Southwestern Sonora (Thornscrub) |
Centwestern Arizona Centwestern Sonora (Sonoran desertscrub) |
Northwestern Arizona (Mohave desertscrub) |
Plant eaters |
Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus auduboni |
a. goldmani | a. arizonae | a. arizonae |
Antelope Jackrabbit Lepus alleni |
a. palitans | a. alleni | a. alleni |
Blacktail Jackrabbit Lepus californicus |
| c. eremicus | c. eremicus |
White-throat Woodrat Neotoma albigulab |
a. melanura | a. albigula | a. albigula |
Sonoran Woodrat Neotoma phenax |
phenax
|
|
|
Desert Woodrat Neotoma lepidab |
| l. devia | l. devia |
Cactus Mouse Peromyscus eremicus |
e. anthonyi | e. eremicus | e. eremicus |
Riparian Mouse Peromyscus merriami |
m. goldmani | m. merriami | m. merriami |
Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus |
| m. sonoriensis | m. sonoriensis |
Canyon Mouse Peromyscus crinitusb |
| c. pallidissimus | c. pallidissimus |
Fulvous Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys fulvescens |
f. tenuis | f. fulvescens |
|
Sonora Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys burti |
burti | burti |
|
Western Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis |
| m. megalotis | m. megalotis |
Rock Squirrel Citellus variegatus |
v. grammurus | v. grammurus | v. grammurus |
Roundtail Ground Squirrel Citellus tereticaudus |
t. neglectus | t. neglectus | t. neglectus |
Sonora Antelope Squirrel Citellus harrisib |
| h. harrisi | h. harrisi |
Desert Cliff Chipmunk Eutamias dorsalis |
| dorsalis (Sonora) |
|
Seed gatherers |
Merriam Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys merriamib |
m. merriami | m. merriami | m. merriami |
Desert Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys desertib |
| d. deserti |
|
Bannertail Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys spectabilis |
| s. perblandus |
|
Ord Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys ordi |
| o. ordi | o. chapmani |
Bajada Pocket Mouse Perognathus baileyib |
b. baileyi | b. baileyi |
|
Thornscrub Pocket Mouse Perognathus goldmani |
g. goldmani |
|
|
Sinaloa Pocket Mouse Perognathus pernix |
p. pernix |
|
|
Desert Pocket Mouse Perognathus penicillatusb |
| p. pricei | p. penicillatus |
Rock Pocket Moose Perognathus intermediusb |
| i. lithophilus | i. lithophilus |
Arizona Pocket Mouse Perognathus amplusb |
| a. rotundus | a. pergracilis |
Little Pocket Mouse Perognathus longimembrisb |
| I. bombycinus |
|
aScientific names, vernacular, and ranges for mammals in
saguaro habitats follow Hall and Kelson (1959) the most recent
reference, and communication from Drs. E. Lendell Cockrum (UA) and James
L. Patton (UCB).
bOther subspecies in area(s) in addition to tabulated. And
other subspecies. |
We have found, however, that only the white-throated
woodrat can subsist entirely on a diet of live saguaro tissues (Fig.
27). This is because the species of Neotoma are able to
metabolize and neutralize oxalates, compounds that are lethal to other
rodents. The story is well told by Schmidt-Nielsen (1964).
|
Fig. 27A. Juvenile saguaro at Saguaro
National Monument (east) severely damaged by white-throated woodrat
(Neotoma albigula) and subsequent freezing. Woodrat tunnels
often extend like a winding staircase completely through the stem. Such
damage occurs on both juvenile and adult saguaros and increases
vulnerability to freezing and to wind-caused stem breakage. Photographed
15 Sept. 1968.
|
Seedlings of saguaros (and those of other cacti) that
are not well hidden on the desert floor are vulnerable "canteens" that
are approximately 90% water. In the desert, such cactus "feeding" rises
sharply during the hot-dry months of May and June that precede the
summer rains. Experimentally, however, we have found that under the
hot-dry stress when ample free water and other fresh green plant
material (grasses and forbs, both with and without seeds, and leaves)
are available at the same time of year (and any other time), the same
ground squirrels (Citellus) and desert mice (Peromyscus,
Onychomys) refuse cactus of any species, age, or succulence. Because
of oxalate poisoning, only one of these mammals (Neotoma) is able
to incorporate the saguaro (and cacti in general) into its diet as a
substantial food item. Desert rodents in general, and certain larger
mammals as well (Fig. 27B), irregularly ingest limited amounts of cactus
tissue primarily or wholly for its water content rather than for its
caloric value. Packrats can and do have it both ways, saguaros
included.
|
Fig. 27B. Juvenile saguaro on the Cabeza
Prieta Game Range (west of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument). In the
more arid portions of the saguaro's range, and elsewhere during periods
of severe drought, jackrabbits utilize the succulent stem tissues as a
source of moisture. Similar consumption by desert bighorn sheep has
been observed (Simmons 1969). Although such damage does not in itself
usually kill the saguaro, such "girdling" increases the plant's
vulnerability to destruction by wind and freezing. Photographed 3 Feb.
1971.
|
Destruction of recently emerged seedlings by cactus
wrens has been observed. However, uprooted plants are not eaten. There
is no doubt that the similar intensive foraging and digging activities
of the curve-billed thrasher, gilded flicker, and gila woodpecker also
result in destruction of young seedlings.
In nonrocky habitats, seedlings are rarely found near
the base of adult saguaros, and almost never become established there.
Such stations are subject to intense disturbance by foraging animals.
Generally, the probability of seedling survival increases with distance
from reproductive adult saguaros.
Insects
Young saguaros are subject to predation by a
diversity of plant-eating insect species, none of which are known to
feed exclusively on saguaros. The list of predators shown in Table 15 is
by no means complete. Our own field observations and reports by others
(Turner et al. 1966; Mann 1969) indicate that a complete listing of
insect predators on young saguaros would include additional families,
and many times the number of species identified. Although some
insect-caused mortality of young saguaros takes place during every month
of the year, the heaviest predation occurs during the humid summer
months immediately following germination, and again with the arrival of
warm weather in April and May.
TABLE 15. Insect consumers of young saguaro cacti, collected in
saguaro habitats at Saguaro National Monument (east). Insects were
placed in closed containers with young saguaros. All species fed,
consuming the entire succulent portions of the stems of one or more
plants.
|
Species | Month collected |
Stage |
|
Lepidoptera |
Cactobrosis fernaldialis (Hulst) | June, July | larva |
Feltia subterranea (Fabricus) | June | larva |
Heliothis zea (Boddie) | April, May | larva |
Orthodes alfkeni (Grote) | July, Dec., Feb. | larva |
Peridroma margaritosa (Hawthorn) | June, July | larva |
Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) | April | larva |
Orthoptera |
Melanoplus sp. | July | nymph |
Heleastus sp. | July | nymph |
Gryllidae 2 spp. | July | adult |
Coleoptera |
Aneflus protensu (Le Conte) | July | adult |
|
During the first weeks following germination, the
succulent seedlings are particularly vulnerable to destruction by the
newly hatched larvae of lepidopterous insects. Immediately after
hatching, the larva enters at the base or at the apex of the seedling to
feed on the succulent inner tissues. Leaving the epidermis largely
intact, the larva then moves on to an adjacent plant. The remaining
withered epidermis presents the appearance of death resulting from lack
of moisture. Some of the previously reported summer drought-kill based
on observations of desiccated seedlings (Steenbergh and Lowe 1969) may
be more correctly attributable to such destruction by insects.
Subsequent observations indicate that insects are second only to rodents
as a cause of seedling death during the first weeks following
germination.
By the end of the first summer growth period, the
relatively tough epidermal tissues protect the seedling from entry by
small insect larvae and the well-developed spines protect the tender
apex. However, the seedling remains vulnerable to destruction by larger
insect predators: grasshoppers, crickets, beetles, and the larger larvae
of certain moths.
Cutworms (noctuid moth larvae) appear to be the most
common insect-consumers of saguaros that have survived beyond the first
summer (Steenbergh and Lowe 1969; Table 15). Leaving only the roots and
spines of demolished plants, cutworms frequently make a meal of several
adjacent young plants (incidentally relieving competition for the
survivors). Consumption of an entire 4-year-old plant (1.5 cm; 0.6 inch
ht) within a 24-hr period was observed. The ability of the young saguaro
to survive insect-caused damage increases with age and sizethe
saguaro outgrows the individual consumptive capacity of most predatory
insects within the first 5 years of life.
Gerstaeckeria turbida (Lec.), a weevil
reported by Turner et al. (1966) to be the principal insect responsible
for the deaths of transplanted (cultured) young saguaros at Saguaro
National Monument, was not observed during our investigations on causes
of mortality in seedlings naturally germinated on-site in saguaro
habitats.
A few species of large insects do occasionally invade
larger juvenile saguaros. At Saguaro National Monument (east) the
destruction of transplanted saguaros up to 30 cm (1 ft) tall by the
larva of a large weevil [Cactophagus validus (LeConte)] has been
observed. Our observations on naturally established saguaros,
however, indicate that insect-caused deaths of such larger juvenile
saguaros rarely occur in nature. Further, our observations strongly
suggest that such destructive invasion of large juvenile saguaros by
insects is limited to weak, moribund, or dead individuals damaged by
freezing or other factors.
Experimental exclosures
Seed broadcasting and experimental exclosures were
used on-site in both the east and west units of Saguaro National
Monument (Tables 19-22; Figs. 19B, 29, 30). Details on the structure and
placement of the wire exclosures are given in Steenbergh and Lowe
(1976).
TABLE 16. First-year survivorship of 231 saguaro seedlings
naturally germinated July 1967 from seeds broadcast within seven
1-m2 plots at Saguaro National Monument. Location-habitat
symbols are: SE = east monument, SW = west monument, F = flats, H =
rolling hills, RN = rocky north-facing slope, and RS = rocky
south-facing slope. Data graphed in Fig. 28.
|
Obs. date |
Elapsed days |
|
|
|
|
Survival
|
East Monument
|
West Monument
|
SEF N = 73
|
SERS N = 23
|
SERN N = 17
|
SEHS N = 10
|
SEHN N = 49
|
SWRS N = 26
|
SWRN N = 33
|
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
|
1967 |
Aug. 1 | 31 |
|
|
9 | 39.1 |
10 | 58.8 |
7 | 70.0 |
8 | 16.3 |
|
|
|
|
Aug. 2 | 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 | 73.1 |
29 | 87.9 |
Aug. 3 | 33 |
10 | 13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug. 8 | 38 |
10 | 13.7 |
8 | 34.8 |
10 | 58.8 |
7 | 70.0 |
8 | 16.3 |
|
|
|
|
Aug. 9 | 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 | 65.4 |
23 | 69.7 |
Aug. 15 | 45 |
10 | 13.7 |
8 | 34.8 |
10 | 58.8 |
3 | 30.0 |
8 | 16.3 |
|
|
|
|
Aug. 18 | 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 | 34.5 |
21 | 63.6 |
Aug. 21 | 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 | 30.8 |
20 | 60.6 |
Aug. 22 | 52 |
9 | 12.2 |
7 | 30.4 |
8 | 47.1 |
3 | 30.0 |
8 | 16.3 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 7 | 68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 | 19.2 |
13 | 39.4 |
Sept. 8 | 69 |
4 | 5.5 |
6 | 26.1 |
6 | 35.3 |
3 | 30.0 |
4 | 8.2 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 19 | 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | 3.8 |
7 | 21.2 |
Sept. 20 | 81 |
2 | 2.7 |
6 | 26.1 |
6 | 35.3 |
2 | 20.0 |
2 | 4.1 |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3 | 94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | 3.8 |
1 | 3.0 |
Oct. 4 | 95 |
2 | 2.7 |
5 | 21.7 |
1 | 5.9 |
1 | 10.0 |
0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 18 | 109 |
2 | 2.7 |
5 | 21.7 |
1 | 5.9 |
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
0 | 0.0 |
1 | 3.0 |
Nov. 1 | 123 |
2 | 2.7 |
5 | 21.7 |
0 | 0.0 |
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
0 | 0.0 |
Nov. 15 | 137 |
1 | 1.4 |
5 | 21.7 |
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 28 | 150 |
|
|
5 | 21.7 |
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 29 | 151 |
1 | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 13 | 165 |
1 | 1.4 |
5 | 21.7 |
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 19 | 171 |
1 | 1.4 |
5 | 21.7 |
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1968 |
Jan. 4 | 187 |
1 | 1.4 |
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
1 | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 10 | 193 |
1 | 1.4 |
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 24 | 207 |
1 | 1.4 |
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb. 7 | 221 |
|
|
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb. 8 | 222 |
1 | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb. 21 | 235 |
1 | 1.4 |
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 6 | 249 |
0 | 0.0 |
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 25 | 360 |
|
|
3 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 17. Regression equations for post-germination survival of
saguaro seedlings germinated July 1967; probit conversion of percent
survival of seedlings (Y) on time in days from 1 July (X)
by least squares. Habitat symbols as in Table 16; data in Table 16 is
graphed in Fig. 28.
|
Habitat | N |
Equation | r |
|
SEF | 18 |
Probit Y = -0.006 X + 3.897 |
-0.882 |
SEHS | 15 |
Probit Y = -0.010 X + 5.225 |
-0.828 |
SEHN | 6 |
Probit Y = -0.016 X + 4.645 |
-0.922 |
SERS | 2.0 |
Probit Y = -0.003 X + 4.617 |
-0.89.0 |
SERN | 8 |
Probit Y = -0.025 X + 6.230 |
-0.943 |
SWRS | 7 |
Probit Y = -0.040 X + 6.762 |
-0.968 |
SWRN | 8 |
Probit Y = -0.040 X + 7.299 |
-0.982 |
|
TABLE 18. Post-germination survival and establishment rates of
saguaro seedlings (N = 231) naturally germinated July 1967 in
representative habitats at Saguaro National Monument; predicted survival
and establishment rates estimated by regression equations in Table 17.
Habitat symbols as in Table 16.
"N" is the original number of seedlings under observation.
Survivorship is shown as time in days to .0.0.01 survival (1 survivor
per 1000 seedlings). Establishment rate is expressed as number of
seedlings per 1000 surviving to the end of the first year of life (15
July 1968). Data in Table 16, graphed in Fig. 28.
|
Habitat | N |
Survivorship
|
Establishment
|
To 0.001 (days) |
1st year (no.) |
|
SEF | 73 | 334.6 | 0.4 |
SEHS | 10 | 3269.0 | 0.1 |
SEHN | 49 | 175.2 | <.0.1 |
SERS | 23 | 1207.6 | 68.2 |
SERN | 17 | 171.1 | <.0.1 |
SWRS | 26 | 120.2 | <.0.1 |
SWRN | 33 | 134.3 | <.0.1 |
|
|
Fig. 28. Post-germination first-year
survivorship of saguaro seedlings (N = 231) naturally germinated July
1967 in representative habitats at Saguaro National Monument; percent
survival on time in days from 1 July. Data in Table 16, regression
equations in Table 17. (click on image for an enlargement in a new
window)
|
Comparison of 1968 seedling survival in open
(unprotected) and exclosure (protected) plots clearly shows that
vertebrate predators are a primary cause of saguaro seedling mortality
during the first 5 pre-winter months of the first year of life (Tables
19-22; Figs. 29 and 30).
TABLE 19. First-year survivorship in protected (exclosure)
plots of 1018 saguaro seedlings naturally germinated July 1968 from
seeds broadcast within five 0.25 m2 (2.7 ft2)
plots. Seedlings were continuously protected from predation by
vertebrate animals (mammals and birds) by 0.5-inch (1.3 cm) mesh
exclosures. Habitat symbols as in Table 16. Data graphed in Figs. 29
and 30.
|
Survival |
Obs. date |
Elapsed days |
East Monument
|
West Monument
|
SEF N = 283
|
SERS N = 232
|
SERN N = 237
|
SWF N = 30
|
SWRS N = 151
|
SWRN N = 85
|
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
|
July 31 | 30 |
283 | 100.0 | 232 | 100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 | 100.0 |
Aug. 1 | 31 |
|
|
|
|
237 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 |
151 | 100.0 |
|
|
Aug. 7 | 37 |
240 | 84.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 | 100.0 |
Aug. 8 | 38 |
|
| 221 | 95.3 |
227 | 95.8 | 30 | 100.0 |
145 | 96.0 |
|
|
Aug. 14 | 44 |
225 | 79.5 |
|
|
|
| 30 | 100.0 |
142 | 94.0 | 85 | 100.0 |
Aug. 15 | 45 |
|
| 206 | 88.8 |
185 | 78.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug. 21 | 51 |
225 | 79.5 |
|
|
|
| 30 | 100.0 |
138 | 91.4 | 85 | 100.0 |
Aug. 22 | 52 |
|
| 155 | 68.8 |
161 | 67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 4 | 65 |
220 | 77.7 | 130 | 56.0 |
20 | 8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 5 | 66 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 | 100.0 |
129 | 85.4 | 85 | 100.0 |
Sept. 18 | 79 |
164 | 58.0 | 84 | 36.2 |
7 | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 19 | 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 | 93.3 |
123 | 81.5 | 84 | 98.8 |
Dec. 9 | 161 |
150 | 53.0 | 84 | 36.2 |
7 | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 10 | 162 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 | 86.7 |
97 | 64.2 | 84 | 98.8 |
1969 |
Jan. 6 | 189 |
150 | 53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 8 | 191 |
|
| 80 | 34.5 |
7 | 3.0 | 26 | 86.7 |
97 | 64.2 | 81 | 95.3 |
Feb. 3 | 217 |
142 | 50.2 | 80 | 34.5 |
7 | 3.0 | 22 | 73.3 |
90 | 59.6 | 79 | 92.9 |
Mar. 3 | 245 |
138 | 48.8 | 80 | 34.5 |
7 | 3.0 | 22 | 73.3 |
90 | 59.6 | 76 | 89.4 |
April 1 | 274 |
138 | 48.8 | 80 | 34.5 |
7 | 3.0 | 22 | 73.3 |
90 | 59.6 | 75 | 88.2 |
May 6 | 309 |
138 | 48.8 | 75 | 32.3 |
6 | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 | 310 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 | 73.3 |
89 | 58.9 | 75 | 88.2 |
June 2 | 336 |
137 | 48.4 | 74 | 31.9 |
6 | 2.5 | 21 | 70.0 |
89 | 58.9 | 72 | 84.7 |
July 1 | 365 |
137 | 48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2 | 366 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 | 66.7 |
89 | 58.9 | 62 | 72.9 |
July 3 | 367 |
|
| 74 | 31.9 |
6 | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31 | 395 |
137 | 48.4 | 74 | 31.9 |
5 | 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug. 1 | 396 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 | 60.0 |
79 | 52.3 | 57 | 67.1 |
|
TABLE 20. First-year survivorship in unprotected (open) plots
of 250 saguaro seedlings naturally germinated July 1968 from seeds
broadcast within five 0.25 m2 (2.7 ft2) plots;
habitat symbols as in Table 16. Data graphed in Figs. 29 and
30.
|
Survival |
Obs. date |
Elapsed days |
East Monument
|
West Monument
|
SEF N = 114
|
SERS N = 27
|
SERN N = 37
|
SWF N = 13
|
SWRN N = 59
|
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
Live | % |
|
July 31 |
| 30 |
114 | 100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 59 | 100.0 |
Aug. 1 | 31 |
|
| 27 | 100.0 |
37 | 100.0 |
13 | 100.0 |
|
|
Aug. 7 | 37 |
94 | 82.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 | 98.3 |
Aug. 8 | 38 |
|
| 22 | 81.5 |
30 | 81.1 |
11 | 84.6 |
|
|
Aug. 14 | 44 |
81 | 71.0 |
|
|
|
|
10 | 76.9 | 58 | 98.3 |
Aug. 15 | 45 |
|
| 9 | 33.3 |
23 | 62.2 |
|
|
|
|
Aug. 21 | 51 |
25 | 21.9 |
|
|
|
|
10 | 76.9 | 43 | 72.9 |
Aug. 22 | 52 |
|
| 6 | 22.2 |
5 | 13.5 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 4 | 65 |
4 | 3.5 | 4 | 14.8 |
1 | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 5 | 66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 | 38.5 | 26 | 44.1 |
Sept. 18 | 79 |
0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.7 |
0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 19 | 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.7 |
Dec. 10 | 162 |
|
| 0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
| 0 | 0.0 |
|
TABLE 21. Comparison of post-germination survival and
establishment rates of saguaro seedlings plots 1268) in paired protected
(exclosure) and unprotected (open) 0.25 m2 (2.7
ft2) plots for seedlings naturally germinated July 1968.
Exclosure plots were covered from the date of seedling emergence with
.0.5-inch (1.3-cm) mesh hardware-cloth cages (30 cm; 11.8 in ht X 61 cm;
24.0 in dia.) to exclude birds and mammals (Fig. 19B).
Survival and establishment rates estimated using regression equations in
Table 22. Habitat symbols as in Table 16. "N" is the original
number of seedlings under observation. Survivorship is shown as time in
days to 0.001 survival (1 survivor per 1000 seed lings). Establishment
rate is expressed as number of seedlings surviving to the end of the
first year of life (15 July 1969). Data in Tables 19 and 2.0, graphed in
Figs. 29 and 30.
|
Habitat | Survivorship and Establishment |
Open
|
Exclosure
|
N |
To 0.001 (days) |
1st year (no.) |
N |
To 0.001 (days) |
1st year (no.) |
|
SEF |
114 |
76.5 |
<0.1 |
283 |
1442.0 |
498.6 |
SERS |
27 |
100.2 |
<0.1 |
232 |
968.8 |
223.4 |
SERN |
37 |
74.2 |
<0.1 |
237 |
462.9 |
60.6 |
SE-(all) |
178 |
85.9 |
<0.1 |
752 |
806.9
| 122.1 |
SWF |
13 |
129.0 |
<0.1 |
30 |
1316.4 |
629.0 |
SWRN |
59 |
91.8 |
<0.1 |
85 |
1001.7 |
737.8 |
SWRS |
|
82.1a |
<0.1a |
151 |
1128.4 |
463.1 |
aEstimated values based on analysis of 1967 data.
|
TABLE 22. Regression equations for post-germination survival of
saguaro seedlings germinated July 1968; probit conversion of percent
survival of seedlings (Y) on time in days from 1 July (X)
by least squares.
Habitat symbols as in Table 16. Data in Tables 19 and 20, graphed in
Figs. 29 and 30.
|
Habitat | N |
Equation | r |
|
UNPROTECTED PLOTS |
SEF | 4 | Probit Y = -0.103 X + 9.805 | -0.979 |
SERS | 5 | Probit Y = -0.056 X+ 7.471 | -0.920 |
SERN | 4 | Probit Y = -0.109 X + 9.971 | -0.973 |
SE (all) | 13 | Probit Y = -0.077 X + 8.558 | -0.837 |
SWF | 4 | Probit Y = -0.046 X + 7.836 | -0.959 |
SWRN | 5 | Probit Y = -0.100 X + 11.059 | -0.977 |
PROTECTED PLOTS |
SEF | 14 | Probit Y = -0.003 X + 5.788 | -0.846 |
SERS | 14 | Probit Y = -0.004 X + 5.736 | -0.724 |
SERN | 14 | Probit Y = -0.007 X + 5.108 | -0.701 |
SE (all) | 42 | Probit Y = -0.004 X + 5.541 | -0.442 |
SWF | 10 | Probit Y = -0.004 X + 6.675 | -0.941 |
SWRS | 14 | Probit Y = -0.004 X + 6.423 | -0.884 |
SWRN | 10 | Probit Y = -0.006 X + 7.870 | -0.962 |
SW (all) | 34 | Probit Y = -0.005 X + 6.924 | -0.668 |
|
|
Fig. 29. First-year post-germination
survivorship in open and protected field plots of saguaro seedlings (N =
338) germinated July 1968 at Saguaro National Monument (west).
As in the east monument, high rates of survival within exclosures
indicate that mammals and birds are a primary cause of first-year
seedling mortality in all habitats. Relative survivorship within
exclosures on north-facing and south-facing slopes is reversed from that
observed in the east monument (see Tables 21 and 22; Fig. 30).
In this arid environment the higher rate of survival on the north-facing
slope is attributed to the more favorable moisture relationships that
prevail in that habitat during critical drought periods.
Regression equations in Table 22, data in Tables 19 and 20. (click on
image for an enlargement in a new window)
|
The life expectancy of seedlings protected by
exclosures that effectively excluded all vertebrate animals (but not
insects) was approximately 10 times that of seedlings subject to natural
predation (Table 21).
Within exclosures, consumption by insects was
the principal cause of seedling deaths. However, despite relatively mild
winter minimum temperatures, there were four freeze-caused seedling
deaths within the two north-slope plots.
The relatively high rate of survival within the east
monument "flats" exclosure is especially noteworthy. In that habitat,
the pre-winter July to November climatic environment is highly favorable
for seedling survival. There, also, it appears that the foraging
activities of birds and rodents are most detrimental to seedling
survival.
Although seedling survival in rocky habitats was
improved vastly by the use of exclosures, the relative suitability of
north-facing and south-facing slopes for seedling survival was not
altered by the exclusion of vertebrate animals. The differences in the
relative suitability of these habitats for pre-winter (July to November)
seedling survival must be attributed to other factors, namely,
consumption by insects and, to a lesser extent at Saguaro National
Monument (west), to differences in moisture availability.
chap4a.htm
Last Updated: 21-Oct-2005
|