data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/630a1/630a17285801dd908b3550bf36cdbd94b0024b2f" alt="online book".gif)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9227/b922763309a4c2058df72cddd5a2bcf6a4f9767e" alt="document cover"
Public Use of the National Park System
MENU
Cover
Contents
Foreword
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Conclusions
Footnotes
|
|
Public Use of the National Park System (1872-2000)
Chapter 11
|
|
Final Summary and Conclusions
1. During almost a century of growth, the National Park System has
achieved great diversity and wide geographic distribution. The System is
no longer overwhelmingly natural and western, but environments and
traditions of every part of the nation are woven together into its
fabric.
2. Public or visitor use functions of the National Park System have
evolved as the System grew and now embrace a cumulative succession of
concepts from resort and recreation in parks and pleasuring grounds; to
enjoyment by such means as will leave the scenery, natural and historic
objects and wildlife unimpaired; to inspiration and benefit in
historical areas; to public outdoor recreation in recreational areas;
and to opportunities for solitude or primitive recreation in wilderness
areas. The unifying theme in this progress has been that the natural,
historical and recreational areas of the System combine to present a
superb expression of our national heritage.
3. Public or visitor use of the System has increased tremendously
during the 92 years of its evolution and at the same time has steadily
widened to include at least some visitors from every geographic region,
from both urban and rural areas, from every ethnic, religious and racial
group, and from every social and economic class except the most
deprived. The composition of this growing user audience is changing with
the changes in our society.
4. The frame of reference developed by the Outdoor Recreation
Resources Review Commission for analyzing national patterns and
activities in outdoor recreation is helpful in studying public use of
the National Park System.
5. Public use of the National Park System may be thought of as
pluralistic with different outdoor recreation activities pursued by
different groups of people in different areas of the same park
simultaneously. Day-use predominates. Some park activities, such as
camping, fishing, and mountain climbing have been studied intensively.
It is at least equally important to study and understand sightseeing,
the principal process through which most Americans today experience at
firsthand their national heritage conserved for them in their National
Park System.
6. Travel for sightseeing in the National Park System is part of a
world-wide social movement which in recent decades has brought the
possibility of leisure travel within reach of many average men around
the world. Sightseeing was one of the original objectives and is a
continuing purpose and function of the National Park System as
established by Congress. Sightseeing is the major visitor use of the
System today. Sightseeing in the System has important values for the
nation. Among other benefits, it is an important unifying force for the
people of the United States.
7. Wilderness area designations, based upon a coherent and eloquent
philosophy, extended hearings in and out of Congress, and helpful
definitions of wilderness use in the legislation itself, provide an
important means of further insuring meaningful wilderness preservation
in the National Park System. Wilderness areas, by definition, provide a
specialized opportunity for solitude that can best be pursued in
designated wilderness areas by a limited number of people at one time.
Wilderness designations reaffirm that wilderness has a definite,
resolute, and permanent home in the National Park System. That home
should be generous and rooted in ecological concepts, but it cannot be
so large that it tends to deprive important numbers of travelling
American families of the opportunity to identify themselves, by a
personal visit, even by automobile, with the great examples of their own
national heritage conserved in their National Park System.
8. The population of the United States is expected to double its 1960
total by 2000; but outdoor recreation activities are growing twice as
fast as population, and travel to the National Park System is mounting
several times more rapidly than outdoor recreation activities generally.
A System travel year of one billion visits by 2000 no longer appears
fantastic. To prevent indigestion followed by strangulation in the
National Park System, mounting public use must be increasingly
regulated.
9. Public use may be, and currently is, regulated in part by measures
aimed at dispersing visitors outside the System. While some of these
measures are necessary and helpful, including developing alternate
routes for non-park travel, they cannot solve the basic problem of
mounting travel because, for most people, there is no substitute for a
visit to a national park.
10. Public use is also regulated by measures aimed at limiting
developments and land uses within parks, and controlling the use of
vehicles. The National Park Service seeks to provide for visitors and to
achieve reasonable limits on development, road construction, and land
uses. The American people, including the sightseers, are increasingly
opposed to ugliness and overcrowding. New methods of public
transportation, based on improved technology that will limit private
automobiles in key locations while still providing access for people,
are also highly important and promising. In the last analysis, however,
if present travel trends continue, all these measures may also be
exhausted long before increases in travel cease.
11. Last of all, public use is also regulated by direct controls over
the volume, duration, and character of visits to important features and
heavily used facilities. Such controls are supported by codes of visitor
conduct, and information and interpretive programs. If park travel
mounts are expected, many more direct controls over the number and
duration of visits to key features and perhaps to entire parks will have
to be developed, especially in older areas; and the Service may have to
reconsider its policy of admitting all visitors if the quality of park
experience is to be maintained. This may be the largest single task in
regulating public use in the years ahead. It is none too soon to
intensify further development of such methods now so they will be
available when and if needed.
12. A new, comprehensive study of public use of the National Park
System, past, present and future, is urgently needed, including detailed
studies of heavily used areas. Management of the National Park System
must be based not only on thorough knowledge of its natural, historical
and recreational resources, but also on surer knowledge of the evolving
character of its citizen users. These studies should be conducted by
behavioral scientists, aided by ecologists, historical preservationists,
and representatives of the management, statistical, interpretive,
planning and design elements of Service organization. Such studies
should be given high priority in order that the Service may meet the
real needs of growing numbers of diverse users, and at the same time
manage the System so as to continue to protect its quality as an
invaluable part of our national heritage.
|
|