|
BACKGROUND TO THE CAMPAIGN
The capture of Forts Henry and Donelson gave Union forces the first
major success toward accomplishment of their grand strategy. This
strategy called for splitting the Confederacy from north to south
via the Mississippi River valley, then turning and splitting it
again from east to west. Confederate authorities countered this strategy
with one of their owna defense line with strategic strong
points such as earthen forts and water batteries to protect the crucial
waterways. They also concentrated forces to protect major rail lines and
roads entering the frontier of their territory. But lacking resources to
construct a river navy and uncertain of the precise axis of Union
invasion, Southern leaders could only await developments by their
opponents.
The rivers of the antebellum South were the key to unlocking the
Confederate heartland. They served as the great interstate highways of
the period. Railroads were in their infancy, and good roads depended on
weather and local support for their maintenance. Commercial development
of the region required steamboats conveying cotton, tobacco, iron, meat,
and grain to market. In return, these craft carried manufactured
products back to farms and plantations. Rivers and steamboats linked
major cities such as Cincinnati, Louisville, St. Louis, Nashville,
Clarksville, Paducah, Memphis, Vicksburg, Natchez, Baton Rouge, and New
Orleans. The river-steamboat combination also aided the flow of culture and social
intercourse in the hinterland. Yet these strategic assets also held
promise for war as well as peace.
|
A PARTIAL VIEW OF THE WESTERN THEATER. (BL)
|
Confederate political and military leaders at all levels realized
too late that Northern steamboat owners had quickly withdrawn most of
their craft to home ports at the first signs of war. Lost then to the
young Confederacy were vital means for transporting men and materiél and
forming the nucleus of a river defense navy. True, some heavy ordnance
was secured from captured Union arsenals and
navy yards in the South. But generally, while state and local
officials turned to the central government in Richmond for relief.
President Jefferson Davis and his administration countered that it was
mainly the responsibility of western Confederate states themselves to
provide for their common defense. So local manpower fed the newly
formed armies while local industry and farms provided food and equipment
for these troops. Local slave owners supplied the labor for farm and
factoryand to construct the earthworks defending the
rivers.
Tennessee became the Confederate frontier in the West. Memphis
and Nasvhille assumed a role in mobilization, and the state capital
also served as the production and communications nerve center
for the entire region.
|
Tennessee became the Confederate frontier in the West. Memphis and
Nashville assumed a role in mobilization, and the state capital also
served as the production and communications nerve center for the entire
region. Yet frontier defense could be pushed no farther than the
boundary with neutral Kentucky. Indeed, the state's neutrality hampered
Confederate commanders like General Albert Sidney Johnston, sent by
Richmond to defend the vast Department Number 2 of the
Confederacy that included all the area stretching from the mountains
of East Tennessee to present-day Oklahoma. He could not advance his army
to the Ohio River, a natural boundary between North and South, because
of the neutral Bluegrass State. Had he been able to do so, the
Confederacy also could have acquired the agriculturally rich midstate
region of Kentucky as well as iron-rich western barrens between the
Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers, indispensable for fighting a long
war.
|
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE. IN THE 1860s. (HW)
|
|
BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY, IN THE 1860s. (HW)
|
Kentucky's neutrality forced Tennessee governor Isham G. Harris and
his Volunteer State advisers to develop defensive positions even before
Johnston's arrival. Despite topographically superior locations in
Kentucky, Tennessee military leaders chose the locations of Forts Henry
and Donelson solely for political reasons. Hence Fort Henry was sited on
the low eastern bank of the Tennessee River immediately south of the
Kentucky line. Fort Donelson would occupy a better position on a hill
beside the Cumberland near the sleepy Stewart County seat of
Doverfarther inside Tennessee territory. Construction of the forts began in
the summer of 1861, and their locations subsequently locked in both
state and Confederate authorities by default, even when both combatants
consciously violated Kentucky's neutrality early in September.
Confederate authorities eventually advanced their forces to armed
camps at Bowling Green on the Louisville and Nashville Railroad and the
high bluffs above the Mississippi at Columbus, Kentucky. But Forts Henry
and Donelson remained in place, some twelve miles apart and about
seventy-five miles downstream (or northwest) of Nashville. No effort was
made to take advantage of better sites on Kentucky soil along the
rivers. True, both forts screened the lateral rail connection between
Bowling Green and Memphis through Clarksville. In fact, the north-south
railroad and Mississippi River axes of advance soon mesmerized Johnston
and his subordinates to the detriment of concern for the twin rivers
sector. It was left to Tennessee volunteers such as the Nashville-raised
10th Tennessee, the 49th and 50th Tennessee from neighborhoods closer to
the forts, and later the 27th Alabama, reflecting the northern part of
that state's concern for defense of the lower Tennessee River, to
prepare the forts. Eventually some 600 slaves were procured from the
neighborhood to expedite the work. Under Brigadier General Lloyd
Tilghman, a Paducah, Kentucky, native, they literally hacked Forts Henry
and Donelson out of a wilderness.
Fort Henry was of the class known as a full-bastioned earthwork,
standing directly on the bank of the river. It enclosed
about two acres and was named for Gustavus A. Henry, the senior
Confederate senator (styled "the Eagle Orator of Tennessee") and native
of nearby Montgomery County. It mounted seventeen heavy guns, mostly
mounted on seacoast artillery carriages, including one ten-inch
Columbiad, throwing a round shot of 128 pounds in weight and another
ostensibly capable of firing a 60-pound elongated shot. The other guns
included twelve 32-pounders, one 24-pounder rifle, and two 12-pounder
siege guns. Nearly all the guns were pivoted and capable of being turned
in any desired direction although their main strength focused on the
river. Outer entrenchments suitable for infantry were
designed to defend the land approach. The
major drawback was that the fort was located on the floodplain and
could easily be inundated by high water.
|
GENERAL LLOYD TILGHMAN (LC)
|
Selected by Colonel Bushrod Johnson, a transplanted Ohioan, West
Pointer, and Nashville professor loyal to his adopted state of Tennessee
as well as the new Confederacy, and affirmed by one of the renowned
engineers of the region, Adna Anderson, Fort Henry's position quickly
became the subject of much derision. In the opinion of another engineer,
Captain J. A. Haydon, and others, on no point on this river "could a
less favorable place have been chosen." Begun about the first of July
1861, Fort Henry was finished in August, and none of the subordinates
such as Haydon felt that they had either rank or prestige to question
the siting decisions of their superiors. Eventually, another fort was
laid out across the Tennessee River on higher ground and named by the
10th Tennessee's soldiers for their beloved commander, Colonel Adolphus
Heiman. Although it was designed to function with Fort Henry, little was
ever accomplished on the site and no guns were ever mounted. Once more,
everyone appeared to believe that there would be plenty of time before
any enemy appeared on the scene.
Fort Donelson, named for senior Tennessee militia general Daniel S.
Donelson, was situated more favorably on the Cumberland. Although
defense of that river also languished because so much attention was
given to Fort Henry's construction, eventually an irregular hilltop
fort was built encompassing one hundred acres overlooking the river near
the tiny Stewart County seat of Dover, about seventy-five miles
downriver from Nashville. At first the Confederates relied on the
reputedly low water in the river and a sunken line of
stone-laden barges across the stream but eventually realized the need
for more substantial shore works. Fort Donelson would become the sole
defense for the state capital.
Two formidable water batteries, situated partway up the slopes of
the one-hundred-foot hill, mounted twelve guns to command the river.
The principal or lower battery boasted one ten-inch Columbiad as well as
thirty-two pounders. The upper battery contained a rifled
sixty-four-pounder Columbiad and two sixty-four-pounder howitzers. All
the guns were protected by thick breastworks surmounted by earth-filled
coffee sacks that also stabilized the gun embrasures. There would be no
question of floodplain or location of this position. Even several small
howitzers situated directly in the main fort could provide plunging fire
on any attacker from the land side. At first, however, there were no
outer infantry entrenchments similar to those at Fort Henry.
Far from the lively atmosphere of the major cities or even towns of
the area, the river fort construction sites were shunned by engineers
and senior officers responsible for their prompt completion. These were
frontier forts, and no socially conscious young scions of Southern
families wanted such an assignment. With winter coming on, the soldiers
slowly built drafty log huts, suffered homesickness as well as the camp
fevers attending field duty, and struggled to drill, mount cannon, and
finish digging the forts' parapets. Overall, the war projected a rather
leisurely air in late 1861 as both sides struggled to organize and train
their fledgling armies. The threat of confrontation seemed distant to
all concerned. Yet in engineer Haydon's words, from the very moment
Tilghman took command, "an energy, confidence and work" took the place
of inactivity, blind faith, and general distaste for effort that had
been infused into the men by lesser officers at the sites. But as Haydon
also noted perceptively, the key to defending the twin river forts in
time of need lay with the accession of forces from Bowling Green and
from Columbus via the railroad, which crossed the Tennessee about twenty
miles above Fort Henry and "inched" up on the Cumberland about fourteen
miles above Fort Donelson.
|
AN ILLUSTRATION OF FORT DONELSON AFTER IT WAS CAPTURED BY
THE UNION ARMY. (HW)
|
|
A LIVING HISTORY DISPLAY AT A FORT DONELSON LOG HUT.
(PHOTO BY JAMES P. BAGSBY)
|
|
THESE KENTUCKIANS, PHOTOGRAPHED IN AUGUST 1860, WOULD LATER BECOME KNOWN
AS THE ORPHAN BRIGADE. (KENTUCKY MILITARY HISTORY MUSEUM)
|
The Confederate story in this period was one of inexperienced yet
patriotic young citizen-soldiers straining to learn the ways of army
life and become a fighting force. Logistical nightmares and strategic
uncertainty, independent state's-rights spirit among western state
politicians, and insufficient men and resources rendered General
Johnston's task very difficult. Physical distances helped negate
coordination along the long defense line. From the Episcopal bishop
turned major general Leonidus Polk commanding at Columbus
on the Mississippi to Major General George B. Crittenden far to the
east in the Kentucky foothills as well as the isolated garrison
commanders on the Tennessee and the Cumberland like Lloyd Tilghman, each
leader acted on his own. Johnston deployed his 55,000 to 60,000 men as
best he could and awaited spring. Making his own headquarters with the
principal maneuver force at Bowling Green (Major General William J.
Hardee's Central Army of Kentucky), the theater commander constantly
telegraphed Richmond for help. Thinking the Louisville and Nashville
Railroad was his most threatened sector, he neglected everything else.
Aides and subordinates occasionally inspected the river forts'
progress, but Johnston never once visited them in person to see their
status or condition.
It is easy to criticize Johnston in retrospect. People expected too
much of him. Jefferson Davis's personal friend (he was the greatest
soldier and ablest man then living, declared the Confederate president),
Johnston too had been born in Kentucky but had adopted Texas as home. A
well-respected senior figure in the old United States Army at the onset
of the Civil War, Johnston had made a well-publicized trek across
country from California to join the
Confederacy only to find that Davis and the War Department proved
more generous with promises and soothing phrases than hard resources
like guns, supplies, and manpower for Department Number 2. Consistently
lacking these war resources Johnston also battled rickety railroads,
cranky states'-rights governors, and an indifferent populace. His major
problem, in the view of postwar observers such as Colonel E. W. Munford,
was simply that he "had no army."
|
GENERAL ALBERT SIDNEY JOHNSTON (LC)
|
|
MAJOR GENERAL DON CARLOS BUELL (BL)
|
Yet part of the problem may have been Johnston himself. Johnston was
hamstrung by the traditional military avoidance of campaigning in
winter and his hope of building his own forces for any anticipated Union
onslaught in the spring. His preoccupation with the north-south
railroad line through Bowling Green was questionable because he had
wide-ranging responsibilities elsewhere. Moreover, he lacked personal
knowledge of many of his subordinates charged with defense of the
theater and their individual requirements that might have been better
gained through personal inspection. He acquiesced to Polk's independence
and localized his focus on affairs at Columbus and on the Mississippi.
Johnston sought to coordinate his subordinates via telegraph and
apparently overlooked the fact that steamboats hauling an invasion force
could navigate rivers in midwinter as well as warmer weather and thus
breach his defense line. Perhaps his years in the American West simply
had not prepared him adequately for modern warfare in the geography of
the eastern half of the country.
Meanwhile, in northern Kentucky and across the Ohio River,
Johnston's Union counterparts faced similar problems
and issues.
Northern generals seemed just as overwhelmed by having to organize
large citizen armies, surmount munitions and equipment shortages, and
deal with politicians at the state and national levels. Like the
Confederates, they overestimated the enemy's strength and capabilities.
The administration of President Abraham Lincoln in Washington badgered
them constantly to rescue East
Tennessee Unionists in the mountains. Yet for all those problems,
Federal authorities controlled the upper Mississippi and Ohio Rivers and
could readily secure river and rail transport for military
operations.
The most immediate problems confronting Union generals in the
western theater seemed to be the divided command and how to formulate an
offensive to restore the seceded states to the Union while reopening the
great Mississippi waterway to commerce. Major Generals John C. Fremont
(the great pathbreaking explorer) and his successor, the scholarly Henry
W. Halleck, commanded upward of the 70,000 to 80,000 men from the St.
Louis headquarters of the Department of the Missouri. Major General Don
Carlos Buell commander of the Louisville-based Department of the Ohio,
mustered some 50,000 more. The boundary between their jurisdictions as
it entered Confederate territory was the Cumberland River. Once again,
waterways were all-important.
|
UNION GUNBOATS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT CARONDELET, ILLINOIS. (BL)
|
Simultaneous river and overland movement by Union armies
offered multiple opportunities to breach Confederate defenses.
|
Offensive operations require more preparations than defending
territory, and so it was in 1861-62. Exploitation of the water
highways provided a major challenge to the Union government.
Simultaneous river and overland movement by Union armies offered
multiple opportunities to breach Confederate defenses. Yet how to
organize the requisite riverine force of gunboats and transports
proved most challenging. Notwithstanding the navy's preference for
war at sea, Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles sent officers to the
western rivers to construct and organize a gunboat flotilla. This
"brown-water navy," as it was called, was fundamental to reopening the
Mississippi and its tributaries including the Tennessee and Cumberland.
But it would take months of patient preparation and coordination
between the armed services as well as cooperation with local industries
to produce the requisite force. The army was jealous and distrustful of
intrusion into its affairs and tried to construct its own fleet. But
veteran sailors such as John Rodgers, Andrew Hull Foote, and Henry Walke
persevered. They developed close ties with Halleck and the soldiers and
engaged shipbuilding interests from Cairo, DeKalb, Mound City, and other
river towns to build new or convert available river craft for combat.
Inventor-engineer James B. Fads of St. Louis contracted to fabricate
what would be called the "Western Flotilla" of ironclad gunboats. Army
camps were scoured for gunboat volunteers.
National arsenals dispatched heavy ship board ordnance, and
shore-based service and supply facilities were created to support the
navy on inland waters. All of this preparation took time, however, and
delayed Halleck and Buell from launching their great advance
southward.
The unlikely combination of the obscure Grant and his crusty,
Calvinist sailor counterpart, Foote, brought action to the plans for
this great offensive. Halleck and his subordinates were stymied by the
formidable Confederate bastion at Columbus, which firmly blocked passage
of the Mississippi. Buell and his commanders were overawed by Johnston
and Hardee sitting squarely athwart the Louisville-Nashville rail line
at Bowling Green. A way was needed to overcome both obstacles
expeditiously and economically. Indeed, Halleck, Buell, William T.
Sherman, various Washington armchair strategists, even a womanthe
controversial activist daughter of an old, influential Maryland family,
Anna Ella Carroll, all claimed authorship of what appeared to be the
most viable alternativethe Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers. One winter evening while
chatting over cigars with Sherman and chief of staff G. W. Cullum in St.
Louis, Halleck supposedly turned to a wall map and circled the
Confederate forts on the Tennessee and Cumberland, "That's the true line
of operations, gentlemen," he said. Random gunboat reconnaissance and
other scouting reports from the area had been suggesting this solution
all fall. Anyone could recognize the weak chinks in Sidney Johnston's
armor by simply looking at such a map, observed Carroll. But looking and
doing something about it were two different matters. The way was
prepared for Foote and Grant.
|
|