|
A WINTER ADVANCE ON FORT HENRY
Far to the east in the Kentucky foothills at Somerset, or Mill
Springs, a portion of Buell's command under Brigadier General George H.
Thomas first cracked Johnston's western defense line on January 19,
1862. Yet that was too far away to have any direct effect on the
Mississippi valley or to help local Unionists, who were being bitterly
persecuted by Confederate authorities in East Tennessee. It took Grant
and Foote to galvanize Halleck into action. But it was not easy. Grant,
headquartered at Cairo, Illinois, where the Ohio joined the Mississippi,
received a stern rebuff from "Old Brains," as Halleck was known, every
time he ventured to St. Louis to suggest offensive action. Despite
commendable Mexican War service like so many of his contemporaries,
Grant's old army reputation for drinking and failure preceded him. He
had left the army in 1854 and for the next six years unsuccessfully
plied civilian trades as farmer, real estate salesman, candidate
for county engineer, customhouse clerk, and finally clerk in a
leather store conducted by his two brothers in Galena, Illinois. When
the war came, this West Pointer and Ohio native transplanted to Illinois
raised and commanded the 21st Illinois, then successfully competed for
one of six Illinois state-appointed brigadier's commissions. Together
with his peers, he began the search for fame and rank, successfully
surviving an ill-fated downriver expedition to Belmont, Missouri, and
setting the stage for greater things with a more successful January
reconnaissance in western Kentucky.
|
THE INTENSE FIGHTING AT MILL SPRINGS, KENTUCKY. (LC)
|
|
CITIZENS OF CAIRO, ILLINOIS, POSE OUTSIDE THE LOCAL POST
OFFICE IN SEPTEMBER 1861. GRANT AND MCCLERNANO ARE SHOWN
IN THE CENTER OF THE PHOTOGRAPH NEXT TO THE
PILLAR. (USAMHI)
|
Still, it took the intervention of the older and more respected
Foote to convince Halleck that the idea of a joint army-navy expedition up the
Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers in midwinter might produce results and
that Grant should be the man to lead it. Since the Western Flotilla
belonged to the army at that time, the old sea dog, Foote, given to
feisty Sunday morning sermons from the quarter deck of his ship at sea,
was ready to team with Grant to make the expedition a success. It was
surely his mature and confident manner that won over the ever skeptical
Halleck. Halleck's main task became to provide support to this
pair as well as to secure Buell's cooperation to pin down the enemy from
reinforcing the threatened point on the twin rivers.
Of course, Halleck may simply have decided that the timing was
right. Intelligence had reached his headquarters that Confederate
General P. G. T. Beauregard, hero of Fort Sumter and the Battle of
Manassas, was on his way west with fifteen regiments of reinforcements
for Johnston. Halleck likely panicked at this news so that the
Foote-Grant initiative appeared at the propitious moment. In any case,
he finally approved their scheme on January 30, 1862. News of his
decision hit Grant's Cairo headquarters like a thunder bolt. While the
brigadier's staff bounded around the office in glee, the amused but
taciturn Grant suggested softly that they should not make so much noise.
They might awaken a slumbering Bishop Polk down at Columbus. This
brought more laughter and cheers, but then everyone got down to working
out the details for the expedition.
On February 3, nine transports carrying some 15,000 troops,
animals, supplies, and artillery batteries slipped away from their
moorings at Cairo and steamed slowly
upstream against the rain-swollen current of the Ohio. Picking up
Foote's escort of four ironclad and three timberclad gun boats, they
reached Paducah and turned southward, up the Tennessee River. Slowly
making their way past random cabins and farms and an occasional friendly
inhabitant waving a handkerchief or Union flag, the column aimed at
establishing base camps just out of range of Fort Henry's guns. Many of
Grant's units had participated in his very wet and unpleasant reconnaissance
in western Kentucky behind Columbus in mid-January. Untested in
battle, they were still eager to close with the enemy and to have a
chance to capture forts and secessionist property. An Illinois officer
boasted to his wife that he expected to float up the Tennessee and
capture the two forts before breakfast. Meanwhile, the navy would scout
the Confederate position.
|
GRANT AS A BRIGADIER GENERAL DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF THE WAR. (USAMHI)
|
The force closing on Fort Henry consisted of two divisions. The
first was commanded by another Illinois brigadier, the
politically ambitious former congressman John A. McClernand, the
second by Brigadier General Charles F. Smith, a stern regular army
officer who had been Grant's cadet commander at West Point. Scattered
throughout the land force were other notables, such as Democratic
politicians turned regimental commandersIllinoisan John A. Logan
and Hoosier Lew Wallace and a smattering of West Pointers and other
experienced militia officers. But mostly Grant's force was a vast array
of farmhands from Nebraska, clerks from Indiana, and river hands and
tradesmen from Ohio and Illinois. On the gunboats served Jack Tars from
the seagoing navy as well as newly minted freshwater sailors from the
army, lured by promises of no more tedious drilling or marches in the
sleet and snow and easier tasks aboard the boats.
Facing this invasion force were Tilghman's
2,800 half-sick, poorly armed, multiattired young soldiers
drawn mostly from Tennessee but also representing Alabama,
Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana.
|
Facing this invasion force were Tilghman's 2,800 half-sick, poorly
armed, multiattired young soldiersdrawn mostly from Tennessee but
also representing Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana. Morale
had been high until the onset of winter, when the icy blasts and snowy
interludes had chilled secessionist ardor for some of the most ardent
boys from the Deep South. Isolation, high incidence of illness, and the
poor position of the fort dampened the spirits of others. Nonetheless,
young David Clark of the 49th Tennessee wrote his cousin Maggie Bell on
January 18 that he hoped the enemy would attack at either Fort Henry or
Fort Donelson. "I feel confidant that we can whip three times our number
. . . our company will enjoy the fun."
|
UNION TROOPS DEBARKING FOR THE HENRY-DONELSON CAMPAIGN. (HW)
|
|
IRONCLADS LIKE THE ESSEX WOULD PLAY A CRUCIAL ROLE
IN THE CAMPAIGN. (USAMHI)
|
With two feet of swollen river water coursing the parade ground and
Fort Heiman of no use for cross fire from across the river, Tilghman was
in a tough position. He controlled access to hundreds of miles of
fertile river-bottom farms and plantations all the way to Muscle Shoals,
Alabama. Just upriver at Danville lay the major river crossing for the
railroad line from Bowling Green to Memphis. The torpedo or mine
obstructions in the river had been swept away or rendered impotent by
the floodwaters. Fort Henry's powder magazines contained inferior
powder (much of it damp or wet) and only eleven of the seventeen heavy
cannon could be brought to bear downriver.
Tilghman decided quickly to abandon Fort Heiman and concentrate his
small garrison inside Fort Henry and its shallow
rifle pits nearby. Eventually, he dispersed his infantry to higher
ground outside the main fort both to guard the land approach to the post
and to avoid the rising water. Most of his men were armed with shotguns
and 1812-era muskets. They lacked sufficient field artillery to counter
Grant's columns. Indeed, Grant's plan of attack called for a combined
naval and land assault on the works. Smith would move against Fort
Heiman (which the Federals did not know was unfinished and about to be
abandoned), while McClernand would march to the rear of Fort Henry and
assault the outlying entrenchments, thereby closing off Tilghman's
retreat route. Foote would steam his gunboats directly against the heavy
seacoast guns commanding the channel approach to Fort Henry.
|
|