CLOSING IN: Marines in the Seizure of Iwo Jima
by Colonel Joseph H. Alexander U.S. Marine Corps (Ret)
Assault Preparations
Iwo Jima was one of those rare amphibious landings
where the assault troops could clearly see the value of the objective.
They were the first ground units to approach within a thousand miles of
the Japanese homeland, and they were participating directly in the
support of the strategic bombing campaign.
The latter element represented a new wrinkle on an
old theme. For 40 years the U.S. Marines had been developing the
capability for seizing advanced naval bases in support of the fleet.
Increasingly in the Pacific Warand most especially at Saipan,
Tinian, and now Iwo Jimathey were seizing advanced airbases to
further the strategic bombing of the Japanese home islands.
American servicemen had awaited the coming of the
B-29s for years. The "very-long-range" bombers, which had become
operational too late for the European War, had been striking mainland
Japan since November 1944. Results proved disappointing. The problem
stemmed not from the pilots or planes but rather from a vexing little
spit of volcanic rock lying halfway along the direct path from Saipan to
TokyoIwo Jima. Iwo's radar gave the Japanese defense authorities
two hours advance notice of every B-29 strike. Japanese fighters based
on Iwo swarmed up to harass the unescorted Superforts going in and
especially coming home, picking off those bombers crippled by
antiaircraft (AA) fire. As a result, the B-29s had to fly higher, along
circuitous routes, with a reduced payload. At the same time, enemy
bombers based on Iwo often raided B-29 bases in the Marianas, causing
some damage.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff decided Iwo Jima must be
captured and a U.S. airbase built there. This would eliminate Japanese
bombing raids and the early warning interceptions, provide fighter
escorts throughout the most dangerous portion of the long B-29 missions,
and enable greater payloads at longer ranges. Iwo Jima in American hands
would also provide a welcome emergency field for crippled B-29s
returning from Tokyo. It would also protect the flank of the pending
invasion of Okinawa. In October 1944 the Joint Chiefs directed Fleet
Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, CinCPac, to seize and develop Iwo Jima within
the ensuing three months. This launched Operation Detachment.
The first enemy in the campaign would prove to be the
island itself, an ugly, barren, foul-smelling chunk of volcanic sand and
rock, barely 10 square miles in size. Iwo Jima means "Sulphur Island" in
Japanese. As described by one Imperial Army staff officer, the place was
"an island of sulphur, no water, no sparrow, no swallow." Less poetic
American officers saw Iwo's resemblance to a pork chop, with the
556-foot dormant volcano Mount Suribachi dominating the narrow southern
end, overlooking the only potential landing beaches. To the north, the
land rose unevenly onto the Motoyama Plateau, falling off sharply along
the coasts into steep cliffs and canyons. The terrain in the north
represented a defender's dream: broken, convoluted, cave-dotted, a
"jungle of stone." Wreathed by volcanic steam, the twisted landscape
appeared ungodly, almost moon-like. More than one surviving Marine
compared the island to something out of Dante's Inferno.
Forbidding Iwo Jima had two redeeming features in
1945: the military value of its airfields and the psychological status
of the island as a historical possession of Japan. Iwo Jima lay in
Japan's "Inner Vital Defense Zone" and was in fact administered as part
of the Tokyo Prefecture. In the words of one Japanese officer, "Iwo Jima
is the doorkeeper to the Imperial capital." Even by the slowest
aircraft, Tokyo could be reached in three flight hours from Iwo. In the
battle for Iwo Jima, a total of 28,000 Americans and Japanese would give
their lives in savage fighting during the last winter months of
1945.
No one on the American side ever suggested that
taking Iwo Jima would be an easy proposition. Admiral Nimitz assigned
this mission to the same team which had prevailed so effectively in the
earlier amphibious assaults in the Gilberts, Marshalls, and Marianas:
Admiral Raymond A. Spruance, commanding the Fifth Fleet; Vice Admiral
Richmond Kelly Turner, commanding the Expeditionary Forces; and Rear
Admiral Harry W. Hill, commanding the Attack Force. Spruance added the
highly regarded Rear Admiral William H. P. Blandy, a veteran of the
Peleliu/Angaur landings, to command the Amphibious Support Forces,
responsible for minesweeping, underwater demolition team operations, and
preliminary naval air and gun bombardment.
As usual, "maintaining unremitting military pressure
on the enemy" meant an accelerated planning schedule and an overriding
emphasis on speed of execution. The amphibious task force preparing to
assault Iwo Jima soon found itself squeezed on both ends. Hill and
Blandy had a critical need for the amphibious ships, landing craft, and
shore bombardment vessels currently being used by General Douglas
MacArthur in his reconquest of Luzon in the Philippines. But bad weather
and stiff enemy resistance combined to delay completion of that
operation. The Joint Chiefs reluctantly postponed D-day for Iwo Jima
from 20 January 1945 until 19 February. The tail end of the schedule
provided no relief. D-Day for Okinawa could go no later than 1 April
because of the approach of the monsoon season. The constricted time
frame for Iwo would have grave implications for the landing force.
The experienced V Amphibious Corps under Major
General Harry Schmidt, USMC, would provide the landing force, an
unprecedented assembly of three Marine divisions, the 3d, 4th, and 5th.
Schmidt would have the distinction of commanding the largest force of
U.S. Marines ever committed in a single battle, a combined force which
eventually totalled more than 80,000 men. Well above half of these
Marines were veterans of earlier fighting in the Pacific; realistic
training had prepared the newcomers well. The troops assaulting Iwo Jima
were arguably the most proficient amphibious forces the world had
seen.
Unfortunately, two senior Marines shared the
limelight for the Iwo Jima battle, and history has often done both an
injustice. Spruance and Turner prevailed upon Lieutenant General Holland
M. Smith, then commanding Fleet Marine Forces, Pacific, to participate
in Operation Detachment as Commanding General, Expeditionary Troops.
This was a gratuitous billet. Schmidt had the rank, experience, staff,
and resources to execute corps-level responsibility without being
second-guessed by another headquarters. Smith, the amphibious pioneer
and veteran of landings in the Aleutians, Gilberts, Marshalls, and
Marianas, admitted to being embarrassed by the assignment. "My sun had
almost set by then," he stated, "I think they asked me along only in
case something happened to Harry Schmidt." Smith tried to keep out of
Schmidt's way, but his subsequent decision to withhold commitment of the
3d Marines, the Expeditionary Troops reserve, remains as controversial
today as it was in 1945.
|
Burdened with heavy packs and equipment, Marine
communicators dash for cover while advancing under heavy fire during the
drive inland from the beaches. Department of Defense Photo (USMC)
109649
|
Holland Smith was an undeniable asset to the Iwo Jima
campaign. During the top-level planning stage he was often, as always, a
"voice in the wilderness," predicting severe casualties unless greater
and more effective preliminary naval bombardment was provided. He
diverted the press and the visiting dignitaries from Schmidt, always
providing realistic counterpoints to some of the rosier staff estimates.
"It's a tough proposition," Smith would say about Iwo, "That's why we
are here."
General Schmidt, whose few public pronouncements left
him saddled with the unfortunate prediction of a 10-day conquest of Iwo
Jima, came to resent the perceived role Holland Smith played in post-war
accounts. As he would forcibly state:
I was the commander of all troops on Iwo Jima at all
times. Holland Smith never had a command post ashore, never issued a
single order ashore, never spent a single night ashore . . . . Isn't it
important from an historical standpoint that I commanded the greatest
number of Marines ever to be engaged in a single action in the entire
history of the Marine Corps?
General Smith would not disagree with those points.
Smith provided a useful role, but Schmidt and his exceptional staff
deserve maximum credit for planning and executing the difficult and
bloody battle of Iwo Jima.
|
(click on image for an enlargement in a new window)
|
The V Amphibious Corps achievement was made even more
memorable by the enormously difficult opposition provided by the island
and the enemy. In Lieutenant General Tadamichi Kuribayashi [see
sidebar], the Americans faced one of the most formidable opponents of
the war. A fifth-generation samurai, hand picked and personally
extolled by the Emperor, Kuribayashi combined combat experience with an
innovative mind and an iron will. Although this would be his only combat
against American forces, he had learned much about his prospective
opponents from earlier service in the United States. More significantly,
he could appraise with an unblinking eye the results of previous
Japanese attempts to repel American invasions of Japanese-held
garrisons. Heroic rhetoric aside, Kuribayashi saw little to commend the
"defend-at-the- water's-edge" tactics and "all-or-nothing" Banzai
attacks which had characterized Japan's failures from Tarawa to Tinian.
Kuribayashi, a realist, also knew not to expect much help from Japan's
depleted fleet and air forces. His best chances, he concluded, would be
to maximize Iwo's forbidding terrain with a defense in depth, along the
pattern of the recent Biak and Peleliu defensive efforts. He would
eschew coast defense, anti-landing, and Banzai tactics and
instead conduct a prolonged battle of attrition, a war of nerves,
patience, and time. Possibly the Americans would lose heart and abandon
the campaign.
Such a seemingly passive policy, even that late in
the war, seemed revolutionary to senior Japanese Army and Navy leaders.
It ran counter to the deeply ingrained warrior code, which viewed the
defensive as only an unpleasant interim pending resumption of the
glorious offensive in which one could destroy the enemy with sword and
bayonet. Even Imperial General Headquarters grew nervous. There is some
evidence of a top-level request for guidance in defending against
American "storm landings" from Nazi Germany, whose sad experience in
trying to defend Normandy at the water's edge had proven disastrous. The
Japanese remained unconvinced. Kuribayashi needed every bit of his top
connections with the Emperor to keep from being summarily relieved for
his radical proposals. His was not a complete organizational
victorythe Navy insisted on building gun casemates and blockhouses
along the obvious landing beaches on Iwobut in general he
prevailed.
Kuribayashi demanded the assistance of the finest
mining engineers and fortifications specialists in the Empire. Here
again, the island favored the defender. Iwo's volcanic sand mixed
readily with cement to produce superior concrete for installations; the
soft rock lent itself to rapid digging. Half the garrison lay aside
their weapons to labor with pick and spade. When American heavy bombers
from the Seventh Air Force commenced a daily pounding of the island in
early December 1944, Kuribayashi simply moved everythingweapons,
command posts, barracks, aid stationsunder ground. These
engineering achievements were remarkable. Masked gun positions provided
interlocking fields of fire, miles of tunnels linked key defensive
positions, every cave featured multiple outlets and ventilation tubes.
One installation inside Mount Suribachi ran seven stories deep. The
Americans would rarely see a live Japanese on Iwo Jima until the bitter
end.
American intelligence experts, aided by documents
captured in Saipan and by an almost daily flow of aerial photography
(and periscope-level pictures from the submarine Spearfish),
puzzled over the "disappearing act" of the Japanese garrison. Trained
photo interpreters, using stereoscopic lenses, listed nearly 700
potential targets, but all were hardened, covered, masked. The
intelligence staffs knew there was no fresh water available on the
island. They could see the rainwater cisterns and they knew what the
average monthly rainfall would deliver. They concluded the garrison
could not possibly survive under those conditions in numbers greater
than 12,000 or 13,000. But Kuribayashi's force was twice that size. The
men existed on half-rations of water for months before the battle
began.
Unlike earlier amphibious assaults at Guadalcanal and
Tarawa, the Americans would not enjoy either strategic or tactical
surprise at Iwo Jima. Japanese strategists concluded Iwo Jima would be
invaded soon after the loss of the Marianas. Six months before the
battle, Kuribayashi wrote his wife, "The Americans will surely invade
this Iwo Jima . . . do not look for my return." He worked his men
ruthlessly to complete all defensive and training preparations by 11
February 1945and met the objective. His was a mixed force of
veterans and recruits, soldiers and sailors. His artillerymen and mortar
crews were among the best in the Empire. Regardless, he trained and
disciplined them all. As the Americans soon discovered, each fighting
position contained the commander's "Courageous Battle Vows" prominently
posted above the firing apertures. Troops were admonished to maintain
their positions and exact 10 American lives for every Japanese
death.
General Schmidt issued VAC Operation Plan 5-44 on 23
December 1944. The plan offered nothing fancy. Mount Suribachi dominated
both potential beaches, but the 3,000 yards of black sand along the
southeastern coast appeared more sheltered from the prevailing winds.
Here the V Amphibious Corps would land on D-day, the 4th Marine Division
on the right, the 5th on the left, the 3d in reserve. The initial
objectives included the lower airfield, the west coast, and Suribachi.
Then the force would swing into line and attack north, shoulder to
shoulder.
Anticipation of a major Japanese counterattack the
first night influenced the landing plan. "We welcome a counterattack,"
said Holland Smith, "That's generally when we break their backs." Both
Schmidt and 4th Marine Division commander Major General Clifton B. Cates
knew from recent experience at Tinian how capable the Japanese were at
assembling large reserves at potential soft points along a fresh
beachhead. The assault divisions would plan to land their artillery
regiments before dark on D-day in that contingency.
The Japanese Commander
|
LtGen Tadamichi Kuribayashi, Imperial Japanese Army.
Department of
Defense Photo (USMC) 152108
|
In the estimation of Lieutenant Colonel Justice M.
Chambers, USMC, a battalion commander (3/25) whose four days ashore
resulted in the Purple Heart and the Medal of Honor: "On Iwo Jima, one
of their smartest generals commanded, a man who did not believe in the
Banzai business; each Jap was to kill ten Marinesfor awhile they
were beating their quotas." Chambers was describing Lieutenant General
Tadamichi Kuribayashi, Imperial Japanese Army, Commanding General,
109th Division and Commander, Ogasawara Army Group. The
U.S. Marines have rarely faced a tougher opponent.
Kuribayashi, 53, a native of Nagano Prefecture, had
served the Emperor as a cavalry officer since graduating from the
Military Academy in 1914. He spent several years as a junior officer
posted to the Japanese Embassies in America and Canada. With the advent
of war in Asia, Kuribayashi commanded a cavalry regiment in combat in
Manchuria and a brigade in northern China. Later, he served as chief of
staff of the Twenty-third Army during the capture of Hong Kong.
Favored by the Emperor, he returned from China to command the
Imperial Guards Division in Tokyo. After the fall of Saipan in
June 1944, he was assigned to command the defensive fortress of Iwo
Jima.
Kuribayashi was a realist. He saw Iwo Jima's crude
air strips as a net liability to the Empire, at best providing nuisance
raids against the B-29s, certain to draw the attention of American
strategic planners. Iwo Jima's airfields in American hands would pose an
enormous threat to Japan. Kuribayashi saw only two options: either blow
up the entire island, which proved infeasible, or defend it to the
death. To do the latter effectively he adapted a radical defensive
policy, foregoing the water's-edge linear tactics and suicidal
Banzai attacks of previous island battles. This stirred
controversy at the highest levelsImperial Headquarters even asked
the Nazis for advice on repelling American invasionsas well as
among Kuribayashi's own officers. Kuribayashi made some compromises with
the semi-independent naval forces on the island, but sacked 18 senior
army officers, including his own chief of staff. Those who remained
would implement their commander's policy to the letter.
Doomed without naval or air support, Kuribayashi
nevertheless proved to be a resolute and resourceful field commander.
His only tactical error was to authorize the sector commander to engage
the U.S. task force covering underwater demolitions team operations on
D-2. This became a gift to the attackers, for it revealed to American
gunners the previously masked batteries which otherwise would have
slaughtered the assault waves on D-day.
Japanese accounts indicate Kuribayashi committed
hara kari, the Japanese ritual suicide, in his cave near Kitano
Point on 23 March 1945, the 33d day of the battle. "Of all our
adversaries in the Pacific," said General Holland M. Smith, USMC,
"Kuribayashi was the most redoubtable." Said another Marine, "Let's hope
the Japs don't have any more like him."
|
The physical separation of the three divisions, from
Guam to Hawaii, had no adverse effect on preparatory training. Where it
counted mostthe proficiency of small units in amphibious landings
and combined-arms assaults on fortified positionseach division was
well prepared for the forthcoming invasion. The 3d Marine Division had
just completed its participation in the successful recapture of Guam;
field training often extended to active combat patrols to root out
die-hard Japanese survivors. In Maui, the 4th Marine Division prepared
for its fourth major assault landing in 13 months with quiet confidence.
Recalled Major Frederick J. Karch, operations officer for the 14th
Marines, "we had a continuity there of veterans that was just
unbeatable." In neighboring Hawaii, the 5th Marine Division calmly
prepared for its first combat experience. The unit's newness would prove
misleading. Well above half of the officers and men were veterans,
including a number of former Marine parachutists and a few Raiders who
had first fought in the Solomons. Lieutenant Colonel Donn J. Robertson
took command of the 3d Battalion, 27th Marines, barely two weeks before
embarkation and immediately ordered it into the field for a sustained
live-firing exercise. Its competence and confidence impressed him.
"These were professionals," he concluded.
|
"Dinah Might," the first crippled B-29 to make an
emergency landing on Iwo Jima during the fighting, is surrounded by
Marines and Seabees on 4 March 1945. Department of Defense Photo (USMC)
112392
|
Among the veterans preparing for Iwo Jima were two
Medal of Honor recipients from the Guadalcanal campaign, Gunnery
Sergeant John "Manila John" Basilone and Lieutenant Colonel Robert E.
Galer. Headquarters Marine Corps preferred to keep such distinguished
veterans in the states for morale purposes, but both men wrangled their
way back overseasBasilone leading a machine gun platoon, Galer
delivering a new radar unit for employment with the Landing Force Air
Support Control Unit.
The Guadalcanal veterans would only shake their heads
at the abundance of amphibious shipping available for Operation
Detachment. Admiral Turner would command 495 ships, of which fully 140
were amphibiously configured, the whole array 10 times the size of
Guadalcanal's task force. Still there were problems. So many of the
ships and crews were new that each rehearsal featured embarrassing
collisions and other accidents. The new TD-18 bulldozers were found to
be an inch too wide for the medium landing craft (LCMs). The newly
modified M4A3 Sherman tanks proved so heavy that the LCMs rode with
dangerously low freeboards. Likewise, 105mm howitzers overloaded the
amphibious trucks (DUKWs) to the point of near unseaworthiness. These
factors would prove costly in Iwo's unpredictable surf zone.
These problems notwithstanding, the huge force
embarked and began the familiar move to westward. Said Colonel Robert E.
Hogaboom, Chief of Staff, 3d Marine Division, "we were in good shape,
well trained, well equipped and thoroughly supported."
On Iwo Jima, General Kuribayashi had benefitted from
the American postponements of Operation Detachment because of delays in
the Philippines campaign. He, too, felt as ready and prepared as
possible. When the American armada sailed from the Marianas on 13
February, he was forewarned. He deployed one infantry battalion in the
vicinity of the beaches and lower airfield, ordered the bulk of his
garrison into its assigned fighting holes, and settled down to await the
inevitable storm.
Two contentious issues divided the Navy-Marine team
as D-day at Iwo Jima loomed closer. The first involved Admiral
Spruance's decision to detach Task Force 58, the fast carriers under
Admiral Marc Mitscher, to attack strategic targets on Honshu
simultaneously with the onset of Admiral Blandy's preliminary
bombardment of Iwo. The Marines suspected Navy-Air Force rivalry at work
heremost of Mitscher's targets were aircraft factories which the
B-29s had missed badly a few days earlier. What the Marines really
begrudged was Mitscher taking all eight Marine Corps fighter squadrons,
assigned to the fast carriers, plus the new fast battleships with their
16-inch guns. Task Force 58 returned to Iwo in time to render sparkling
support with these assets on D-day, but two days later it was off again,
this time for good.
The other issue was related and it concerned the
continuing argument between senior Navy and Marine officers over the
extent of preliminary naval gunfire. The Marines looked at the
intelligence reports on Iwo and requested 10 days of preliminary fire.
The Navy said it had neither the time nor the ammo to spare; three days
would have to suffice. Holland Smith and Harry Schmidt continued to
plead, finally offering to compromise to four days. Turner deferred to
Spruance who ruled that three days prep fires, in conjunction with the
daily pounding being administered by the Seventh Air Force, would do the
job.
Lieutenant Colonel Donald M. Weller, USMC, served as
the FMFPAC/Task Force 51 naval gun fire officer, and no one in either
sea service knew the business more thoroughly. Weller had absorbed the
lessons of the Pacific War well, especially those of the conspicuous
failures at Tarawa. The issue, he argued forcibly to Admiral Turner, was
not the weight of shells nor their caliber but rather time. Destruction
of heavily fortified enemy targets took deliberate, pinpoint firing from
close ranges, assessed and adjusted by aerial observers. Iwo Jima's 700
"hard" targets would require time to knock out, a lot of time.
|
An
aerial view of Iwo Jima before the landing clearly shows "pork chop"
shape. Mount Suribachi, in the right foreground, is at the southern end
of the island. Department of Defense Photo (USMC) 413529
|
Neither Spruance nor Turner had time to give, for
strategic, tactical, and logistical reasons. Three days of firing by
Admiral Blandy's sizeable bombardment force would deliver four times the
amount of shells Tarawa received, and one and a half times that
delivered against larger Saipan. It would have to do.
|
A
Marine inspects a Japanese coastal defense gun which, although protected
by steel-reinforced concrete, was destroyed in prelanding naval gunfire
bombardments. Col William P. McCahill Collection
|
In effect, Iwo's notorious foul weather, the
imperviousness of many of the Japanese fortifications, and other
distractions dissipated even the three days' bombardment. "We got about
thirteen hours' worth of fire support during the thirty-four hours of
available daylight," complained Brigadier General William W. Rogers,
chief of staff to General Schmidt.
The Americans received an unexpected bonus when
General Kuribayashi committed his only known tactical error during the
battle. This occurred on D-minus-2, as a force of 100 Navy and Marine
underwater demolition team (UDT) frogmen bravely approached the eastern
beaches escorted by a dozen LCI landing craft firing their guns and
rockets. Kuribayashi evidently believed this to be the main landing and
authorized the coastal batteries to open fire. The exchange was hot and
heavy, with the LCIs getting the worst of it, but U.S. battleships and
cruisers hurried in to blast the casemate guns suddenly revealed on the
slopes of Suribachi and along the rock quarry on the right flank.
|
(click on image for an enlargement in a new window)
|
That night, gravely concerned about the hundreds of
Japanese targets still untouched by two days of firing, Admiral Blandy
conducted a "council of war" on board his flagship. At Weller's
suggestion, Blandy junked the original plan and directed his gunships to
concentrate exclusively on the beach areas. This was done with
considerable effect on D minus-1 and D-day morning itself. Kuribayashi
noted that most of the positions the Imperial Navy insisted on building
along the beach approaches had in fact been destroyed, as he had
predicted. Yet his main defensive belts criss-crossing the Motoyama
Plateau remained intact. "I pray for a heroic fight," he told his
staff.
On board Admiral Turner's flagship, the press
briefing held the night before D-day was uncommonly somber. General
Holland Smith predicted heavy casualties, possibly as many as 15,000,
which shocked all hands. A man clad in khakis without rank insignia then
stood up to address the room. It was James V. Forrestal, Secretary of
the Navy. "Iwo Jima, like Tarawa, leaves very little choice," he said
quietly, "except to take it by force of arms, by character and
courage."
|