CLOSING IN: Marines in the Seizure of Iwo Jima
by Colonel Joseph H. Alexander U.S. Marine Corps (Ret)
Iwo Jima's Costs, Gains, and Legacies
In its 36 days of combat on Iwo Jima, the V
Amphibious Corps killed approximately 22,000 Japanese soldiers and
sailors. The cost was staggering. The assault units of the
corpsMarines and organic Navy personnelsustained 24,053
casualties, by far the highest single-action losses in Marine Corps
history. Of these, a total of 6,140 died. Roughly one Marine or corpsman
became a casualty for every three who landed on Iwo Jima.
According to a subsequent analysis by military
historian Dr. Norman Cooper, "Nearly seven hundred Americans gave their
lives for every square mile. For every plot of ground the size of a
football field, an average of more than one American and five Japanese
were killed and five Americans wounded."
The assault infantry units bore the brunt of these
losses. Captain William T. Ketcham's Company I, 3d Battalion, 24th
Marines, landed on D-day with 133 Marines in the three rifle platoons.
Only nine of these men remained when the remnants of the company
reembarked on D+35. Captain Frank C. Caldwell reported the loss of 221
men from Company F, 1st Battalion, 26th Marines. At the end, a private
first class served as platoon commander for Caldwell's merged first and
second platoons. Elsewhere in the 1st Battalion, 26th Marines, Captain
Tom Fields relinquished command of Company D on the eighth day to
replace the battalion executive officer. Rejoining his company at the
end of the battle, Fields was sickened to find only 17 of the original
250 men still in the ranks. Company B, 1st Battalion, 28th Marines, went
through nine company commanders in the fighting; 12 different Marines
served as platoon leader of the second platoon, including two buck
privates. Each division, each regiment, reported similar conditions.
|
The
fighting hardly over, grizzled, begrimed, and tired Marines solemnly
display the spoils of war captured in a very long, difficult, and
hard-fought battle. Marine Corps Historical Collection
|
As the extent of the losses became known in the
press, the American public reacted with shock and dismay as they had 14
months earlier at Tarawa. This time, however, the debate about the high
cost of forcibly seizing an enemy island raged in the press while the
battle was still being fought.
The Marine Corps released only one official
communique about specific battle losses during the battle, reporting
casualties of nearly 5,000 men on 22 February. Five days later, at the
insistence of press baron William Randolph Hearst, an early supporter of
the MacArthur-for-President claque, the San Francisco Examiner
ran a front page editorial bewailing the Marines' tactics and
losses. "It's the same thing that happened at Tarawa and Saipan," the
editorial stated, urging the elevation of General MacArthur to supreme
command in the Pacific, because "HE SAVES THE LIVES OF HIS OWN MEN."
With that, 100 off-duty Marines stormed the offices of the
Examiner demanding an apology. Unfortunately, the Hearst
editorial received wide play; many families of Marines fighting at Iwo
Jima forwarded the clippings. Marines received these in the mail while
the fighting still continued, an unwelcome blow to morale.
President Roosevelt, long a master of public opinion,
managed to keep the lid on the outcry by emphasizing the sacrifice of
the troops as epitomized by the Joe Rosenthal photograph of the second
Suribachi flag-raising. The photograph was already widely renowned. FDR
made it the official logo of the Seventh War Bond Drive and demanded the
six flag-raisers be reassigned home to enhance popular morale.
Regrettably, three of the six men had already been killed in subsequent
fighting in the drive north on Iwo Jima.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff looked appraisingly at Iwo
Jima's losses. No one questioned the objective; Iwo Jima was an island
that categorically had to be seized if the strategic bombing campaign
was ever going to be effective. The island could therefore not be
bypassed or "leap frogged." There is considerable evidence that the
Joint Chiefs considered the use of poison gas during the Iwo Jima
planning phase. Neither Japan nor the United States had signed the
international moratorium, there were no civilians on the island, the
Americans had stockpiles of mustard gas shells in the Pacific theater.
But President Roosevelt scotched these considerations quickly. America,
he declared, would never make first use of poison gas. In any case, the
use of poison gas on an area as relatively small as Iwo Jima, whose
prevailing winds would quickly dissipate the gas fumes, became moot.
This left the landing force with no option but a frontal amphibious
assault against the most heavily fortified island America ever faced in
the war.
|
The
fighting continues and continues. For weary flamethrower operators Pvt
Richard Klatt, left, and PFC Wilfred Voegeli the campaign is just one
cave after another. Department of Defense Photo (USMC) 110599
|
On the other hand, seizure of Iwo Jima provided
significant strategic benefits. Symbolically, the Marines raised the
flag over Mount Suribachi on the same day that General MacArthur entered
Manila. The parallel capture of the Philippines and Iwo Jima, followed
immediately by the invasion of Okinawa, accelerated the pace of the war,
bringing it at long last to Japan's doorstep. The three campaigns
convincingly demonstrated to the Japanese high command that the
Americans now had the capabilityand the willto overwhelm
even the most stoutly defended islands. Kyushu and Honshu would be
next.
|
Uncommon valor in a peaceful setting: this 4th Division
Marine threatens the enemy even in death. His bayonet fixed and pointing
in the direction of the enemy, he was killed by a sniper before he even
got off the beach on D-day. Department of Defense Photo (USMC)
109624
|
Iwo Jima in American hands produced immediate and
highly visible benefits to the strategic bombing campaign. Marines
fighting on the island were reminded of this mission time and again as
crippled B-29 Superforts flew in from Honshu. The capture of Iwo Jima
served to increase the operating range, payload, and survival rate of
the big bombers. The monthly tonnage of high explosives dropped on
Imperial Japan by B-29s based in the Marianas increased eleven-fold in
March alone. As early as 7 April a force of 80 P-51 Mustangs of VII
Fighter Command took off from Iwo Jima to escort B-29s striking the
Nakajima aircraft engine plant in Tokyo. But the Army Air Force valued
Iwo Jima most of all as an emergency landing field. By war's end, a
total of 2,251 B-29s made forced landings on the island. This figure
represented 24,761 flight crewmen, many of whom would have perished at
sea without the availability of Iwo Jima as a safe haven. Said one
B-29 pilot, "whenever I land on this island I thank God for the men who
fought for it."
General Tadamichi Kuribayashi proved to be one of the
most competent field commanders the Marines ever faced. He displayed a
masterful grasp of the principles of simplicity and economy of force,
made maximum use of Iwo's forbidding terrain, employed his artillery and
mortars with great skill, and exercised command with an iron will
virtually to the end. He was also a realist. Without hope of even
temporary naval or air superiority he knew he was doomed from the start.
In five weeks of unremitting pressure, the Americans breached every
strongpoint, exterminated his forces, and seized the island.
|
With
his buddies holding the four corners of the National Colors, the last
rites for a fallen Marine are offered by the chaplain at a temporary
gravesite in Iwo's black sand. Chaplains of all religious persuasions
heroically ministered to all Marines and Corpsmen throughout the thick
of the fighting at their own risk. Department of Defense Photo (USMC)
142434
|
Iwo Jima represented at once the supreme test and the
pinnacle of American amphibious capabilities in the Pacific War. The
sheer magnitude of the taskplanning the assault and sustaining of
that many troops against such a formidable objectivemade Operation
Detachment an enduring model of "detailed planning and violent
execution." Here the element of surprise was not available to the
attacker. Yet the speed of the American landing and the toughness with
which assault units with stood the withering barrages astounded the
Japanese defenders. "The landing on Iwo was the epitome of everything
we'd learned over the years about amphibious assaults," said Colonel
Wornham of the 27th Marines. Bad as the enemy fire became on D-day,
there were no reports of "Issue in doubt." Lieutenant Colonel Galer
compared Iwo Jima with his Guadalcanal experience: "Then it was 'can we
hold?' Here at Iwo Jima the question was simply 'When can we get it
over?'"
The ship-to-shore assault at Iwo was impressive
enough, but the real measure of amphibious effectiveness can be seen in
the massive, sustained logistical support which somehow flowed over
those treacherous beaches. Not only did the Marines have all the
ammunition and flamethrower refills they needed, around the clock, but
they also had many of the less obvious necessities and niceties which
marked this battle as different from its predecessors. Marines on Iwo
had ample quantities of whole blood, some of it donated barely two weeks
in advance, flown in, refrigerated, and available. The Marines also had
mail call, unit newsletters, fresh water, radio batteries, fresh-baked
bread, and prefabricated burial markers, thousands of them.
Iwo Jima featured superior inter-service cooperation.
The Navy-Marine Corps team rarely functioned more efficiently. The
blue-water Navy continued to earn the respect of the Marines, especially
on D-2 when the flotilla of tiny LCI gunboats bravely attacked the
coastal defense guns to protect the Navy and Marine frogmen. Likewise,
the Marines welcomed the contributions of the Army, Coast Guard, Coast
and Geodetic Survey, Red Cross, and the host of combat
correspondentsall of whom shared both the misery and the glory of
the prolonged battle.
Above and Beyond the Call of Duty
Twenty-seven men received the Congressional Medal of
Honor for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity during the battle of Iwo
Jima: 22 Marines, four Navy corpsmen, and one Navy landing craft
commander. Exactly half of the awards issued to Marines and corpsmen of
the V Amphibious Corps were posthumous. Within a larger institutional
context, Iwo Jima represented more than one-fourth of the 80 Medals of
Honor awarded Marines during the Second World War. This was Iwo Jima's
Roll of Honor:
Cpl Charles J. Berry, 1/26, 3 March 1945*
PFC William R. Caddy, 3/26, 3 March*
LtCol Justice M. Chambers, 3/25, 19-22 February
Sgt Darrell S. Cole, 1/23, 19 February*
Capt Robert Dunlap, 1/26, 20-21 February
Sgt Ross F. Gray, 1/25, 21 February
Sgt William G. Harrell, 1/28, 3 March
Lt Rufus G. Herring, USNR, LCI 449, 17 February
PFC Douglas T. Jacobson, 3/23, 26 February
PltSgt Joseph J. Julian, 1/27, 9 March*
PFC James D. LaBelle, 1/27, 8 March*
2dLt John H. Leims, 1/9, 7 March
PFC Jacklyn H. Lucas, 1/26, 20 February
1stLt Jack Lummus, 2/27, 8 March*
Capt Joseph J. McCarthy, 2/24, 21 February
1stLt Harry L. Martin, 5th Pioneer Battalion, 26 March*
Pvt George Phillips, 2/28, 14 March*
PhM 1/c Francis J. Pierce, USN, 2/24, 15-16 March
PFC Donald J. Ruhl, 2/28, 19-21 February*
Pvt Franklin E. Sigler, 2/26, 14 March
Cpl Tony Stein, 1/28, 19 February*
PhM 2/c George Wahlen, USN, 2/26, 3 March
GySgt William G. Walsh, 3/27, 27 February*
Pvt Wilson D. Watson, 2/9, 26-27 February
Cpl Hershel W. Williams, 1/21, 23 February
PhM 3/c Jack Williams, USN, 3/28, 3 March*
PhM 1/c John H. Willis, USN, 3/27, 28 February*
* Posthumous
Two aspects of the battle remain controversial: the
inadequate preliminary bombardment and the decision to use piecemeal
replacements instead of organized units to strengthen the assault
forces. Both decisions, rendered in the context of several competing
factors, were made by experienced commanders in good faith. Unavoidably,
Iwo Jima's biggest cost to the V Amphibious Corps was the loss of so
many combat veterans in taking the island. While the battle served to
create a new generation of veterans among the survivors, many proud
regiments suffered devastating losses. With these same units already
designated as key components of the landing force against the Japanese
home islands, such losses had serious potential implications. These
factors may well have influenced General Holland Smith's unpopular
decision to withhold the 3d Marines from the battle. From the
perspective of an exhausted company commander on Iwo Jima, Smith's
decision seemed inexcusable, then and now; from the wider perspective of
the commanding general, Fleet Marine Forces, Pacific, the decision makes
more sense.
|
At
the end of a very long fight, a Marine flamethrower operator pauses to
light up. Department of Defense Photo (USMC) 111147
|
Whatever his shortcomings, Holland Smith probably
knew amphibious warfare better than anyone. Of the hundreds of
after-action reports filed immediately following the battle, his
official analysis best captured the essence of the struggle:
There was no hope of surprise, either strategic or
tactical. There was little possibility for tactical initiative; the
entire operation was fought on what were virtually the enemy's own terms
. . . . The strength, disposition, and conduct of the enemy's defense
required a major penetration of the heart of his prepared positions in
the center of the Motoyama Plateau and a subsequent reduction of the
positions in the difficult terrain sloping to the shore on the flanks.
The size and terrain of the island precluded any Force Beachhead Line.
It was an operation of one phase and one tactic. From the time the
engagement was joined until the mission was completed it was a matter of
frontal assault maintained with relentless pressure by a superior mass
of troops and supporting arms against a position fortified to the
maximum practical extent.
We Americans of a subsequent generation in the
profession of arms find it difficult to imagine a sustained amphibious
assault under such conditions. In some respects the fighting on Iwo Jima
took on the features of Marines fighting in France in 1918, described by
one as "a war girt with horrors." We sense the drama repeated every
morning at Iwo, after the prep fires lifted, when the riflemen,
engineers, corpsmen, flame tank crews, and armored bulldozer operators
somehow found the fortitude to move out yet again into "Death Valley" or
"The Meatgrinder." Few of us today can study the defenses, analyze the
action reports, or walk the broken ground without experiencing a sense
of reverence for the men who won that epic battle.
Fleet Admiral Nimitz said these words while the
fighting still raged: "Among the Americans who served on Iwo Jima,
uncommon valor was a common virtue," a sentiment now chiseled in granite
at the base of Felix de Weldon's gigantic bronze sculpture of the
Suribachi flag-raising.
|
LtGen Holland M. Smith, USMC, with his Fleet Marine
Force, Pacific, chief of staff, Col Dudley S. Brown, surveys the
wreckage along the landing beaches. Iwo Jima was Gen Smith's last
battle. After this, he returned to his headquarters on Hawaii.
Department of
Defense Photo (USMC) 110635
|
Twenty-two Marines, four Navy corpsmen, and one LCI
skipper were awarded the Medal of Honor for utmost bravery during the
battle of Iwo Jima. Half were posthumous awards.
General Erskine placed these sacrifices in
perspective in remarks made during the dedication of the 3d Marine
Division cemetery on the embattled island:
Victory was never in doubt. Its cost was. What was in
doubt, in all our minds, was whether there would be any of us left to
dedicate our cemetery at the end, or whether the last Marine would die
knocking out the last Japanese gunner.
Assault Division's Command Structures
As the 3d, 4th, and 5th Marine Divisions conducted
their final preparations for Operation Detachment, these were the
infantry commanders who would lead the way at the beginning of the
battle:
3d Marine Division |
3d Marines | Col James A. Stewart |
9th Marines | Col Howard N. Kenyon |
1/9 | LtCol Carey A. Randall |
2/9 | LtCol Robert E. Cushman, Jr. |
3/9 | LtCol Harold C. Boehm |
21st Marines | Col Hartnoll J. Withers |
1/21 | LtCol Marlowe C. Williams |
2/21 | LtCol Lowell E. English |
3/21 | LtCol Wendell H. Duplantis |
4th Marine Division |
23d Marines | Col Walter W. Wensinger |
1/23 | LtCol Ralph Haas |
2/23 | Maj Robert H. Davidson |
3/23 | Maj James S. Scales |
24th Marines | Col Col Walter I. Jordan |
1/24 | Maj Ralph S. Treitel |
2/24 | LtCol Richard Rothwell |
3/24 | LtCol Alexander A. Vadergrift,. Jr. |
25th Marines | Col John R. Lanigan |
1/25 | LtCol Hollis U. Mustain |
2/25 | LtCol Lewis C. Hudson, Jr. |
3/25 | LtCol Justice M. Chambers |
5th Marine Division |
26th Marines | Col Chester B. Graham |
1/26 | LtCol Daniel C. Pollock |
2/26 | LtCol Joseph P. Sayers |
3/26 | LtCol Tom M. Trotti |
27th Marines | Col Thomas A. Wornham |
1/27 | LtCol John A. Butler |
2/27 | Maj John W. Antonelli |
3/27 | LtCol Donn J. Robertson |
28th Marines | Col Harry B.l Liversedge |
1/28 | LtCol Jackson B. Butterfield |
2/28 | LtCol Chandler W. Johnson |
3/28 | LtCol Charles E. Shepard, Jr. |
[Note: Of those infantry battalion commanders who
landed on Iwo Jima on D-Day, only seven remained unwounded and still
retained command at the battle's end].
|
|