Contents
Foreword
Preface
Jesuit Foundations
Gray Robes for Black 1767-68
The Archreformer Backs Down 1768-72
Tumacácori or Troy? 1772-74
The Course of Empire 1774-76
The Promise and Default of the Provincias Internas 1776-81
The Challenge of a Reforming Bishop 1781-95
A Quarrel Among Friars 1795-1808
"Corruption Has Come Among Us" 1808-20
A Trampled Guarantee 1820-28
Hanging On 1828-56
Epilogue
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliography
|

In the ecstasy of our jubilation shout out: Long
live the sainted religion we profess!
Agustín de Iturbide, Iguala,
February 24, 1821
An army shall be formed for the support of
Religion, independence, and Union, guaranteeing these three principles,
and therefore it shall be called the army of the three
Guarantees.
Article 12, Plan de Iguala,
February 24, 1821
The friars who were serving in the missions were all
Spaniards, a circumstance that obliged them to put up with a great deal
and denied them the opportunity for recourse. . . . The citizens began
to consider themselves owners of [mission] lands and water, thus giving
both indians and missionaries a wretched time of it.
Fray José María Pérez Llera,
Apuntes
CONCURRENT EVENTS
1821 | Moses Austin secures a charter
from the government of New Spain to settle American families in
Texas.
William Becknell and others "open" the Santa Fe Trail from Missouri to
New Mexico.
In his annual message to Congress, President James Monroe declares the
New World off limits to future European colonization.
San Francisco Solano founded, last of California's Hispanic
missions. |
1824 | A U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs
established under the Department of War. |
1826 | Jedediah Smith of the Rocky
Mountain Fur Company treks from the Great Salt Lake rendezvous to San
Gabriel, California.
James Fenimore Cooper publishes The Last of the
Mohicans. |
1828 | In England the Duke of
Wellington forms a Tory ministry. |
HAD NARCISO GUTIÉRREZ LIVED three weeks longer
he would have met the bishop. Fray Bernardo del Espíritu Santo,
peninsular Spaniard, Carmelite, and former confessor to a viceroy, had
vowed to carry "his first, holy, and general visitation" to the farthest
reaches of his diocese, in Sonora all the way to the Santa Cruz Valley,
to Tumacácori, Tubac, and Tucson, where none of his predecessors
had ever ventured. In the teeth of driving dust, despite axle-deep mud,
rain, torrid heat, and bitter cold, and nearly a year on the road,
Bernardo, Bishop of Sonora, did come.
Convoyed by armed riders, the bishop's entourage
proceeded slowly down the valley late in December, 1820. From the mines
of Guevavi, the rancho of Calabazas, and the other clusters of adobe
jacales up and down the river, parents brought their children for
confirmation. As he laid his right hand on the head of each the
sixty-one-year-old prelate intoned in Latin "I sign thee with the sign
of the cross and I confirm thee with the chrism of salvation, in the
name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." On this
visitation alone, the bishop would travel over three thousand miles and
confirm an estimated sixty thousand persons. [1]
At Tumacácori a tall, slender, newly arrived
friar, rather swarthy, with black hair, black eyes, and a mallorquin
accent, received the bishop on New Year's Day, 1821. He presented the
mission books of administration for the prelate's inspection. Two burial
entries left unsigned since mid-November, when Father Narciso had been
too weak even to write his name, Bishop Bernardo ordered signed. His
secretary then inscribed formal notice of the episcopal visitation. Not
until later did someone write a terse, unnumbered entry recording the
death of Narciso Gutiérrez "on December 13, 1821," an error for
1820. Again, in his uneven scrawl, the new friar signed. [2]
Father Narciso would not have approved of his
successor. The erratic Juan Bautista Estelric, age thirty-six, was one
of the "new ones," a member of the notorious mission of 1810-1813. He
had been at Magdalena, visita of San Ignacio, since May of 1819. A
couple of weeks after Gutiérrez died he took over at
Tumacácori and Tubac.
Born November 24, 1784, in the villa of Muro on the
isle of Mallorca, Estelric had taken the holy habit of Saint Francis on
February 21, 1801, in the convento of Santa María de los
Ángeles de Jesús outside the walls of Palma. He had sailed
for overseas missions from Cádiz in November 1812 aboard the
frigate Veloz with three other recruits. Because of the
insurrection in New Spain, they had been transshipped from Veracruz to
the port of Altamira. From there they made their way overland to San
Luis Potosí, where the leader of the little band, Fray Manuel
Marín, comported himself like a soldier, which the others
reported to Querétaro. From the moment they reached the college
Marín moaned that he could not stand the place or the thought of
a missionary's life. His behavior convinced Father Bringas that some of
the new recruits had answered the call in Spain out of fear of French
bayonets, not because of missionary zeal. [3]
|
Bishop Bernardo del Espíritu
Santo. From Villa, Bodas de Plata
|
Father Estelric took stock in a hurry. He noted that
his mission had yielded during 1820 only 160 fanegas of wheat, 12 of
maize, 16 of frijoles, no garbanzos and no lentils. Obviously his 121
Indians and 75 gente de razón could not subsist on that. Yet the
mission still showed on the books 5,500 head of cattletwenty-eight
for every man, woman, and child1,080 sheep, down considerably in
the past few years, 590 horses, 60 mules, and 20 donkeys. [4] Therein roamed Tumacácori's
potential wealth, if only a buyer could be found. Just then one
appeared.
Twenty-nine-year-old don Ignacio Pérez, a
native of Arizpe, a frontier career officer, rancher, and entrepreneur,
and son of the owner of the Cananea mines, had big plans. "He shows
promise," said his military superiors, "because of his ready aptitude
and talent." In December, 1820, he had applied for a grant to the
sprawling San Bernardino ranch, a hundred miles east of
Tumacácori. In his petition Pérez outlined his plans for
converting the San Bernardino into a buffer zone between the Apaches and
the northern settlements. It would complement the presidial cordon. He
might even induce Apaches to farm some of his land. [5] But foremost in don Ignacio's mind was a
cattle empire, as large as any in the province. To stock the San
Bernardino he needed thousands of head. At Tumacácori,
Pérez and Estelric struck a bargain.
The contract, signed on January 2, 1821, the day
after the bishop's visitation, called for the sale of 4,000 of the
mission's cattle at three pesos a head, the proceeds to go toward
completion of Gutiérrez' long-deferred church. Pérez
agreed to pay four thousand pesos in cash upon receipt of the herd, two
thousand more in six months, and the remaining six thousand within a
year and a half. The friar set vaqueros to rounding up the half-wild
stock.
In February, Pérez' associate, don Rafael
Elías González, reined up at Tumacácori. He had the
money. Don Rafael, a rancher in his own right and later governor of
Sonora, was a brother of Lieutenant Ignacio Elías
González, now in residence at Tubac, and of Adjutant Inspector
Simón Elías González, whom many remembered as one
of the council of war that had sentenced Father Hidalgo to death in
1811. Father Estelric was dealing with the frontier ricos. As don
Rafael's men headed up the herd the friar congratulated himself. In no
more than a few weeks he had realized four thousand pesos. He held a
contract with reputable persons for another eight thousand. Now he could
get on with the building. [6]
During the last years of Spanish rule in Mexico the
racial makeup in and around the Pimería Alta missions was notably
different from what it had been when the first Queretaran friars arrived
a half-century before. There were far more gente de razón, and
only half as many mission Indians. The Franciscans statistics for the
eight missions and their visitas, not counting presidial communities,
told the story:
Year | Indians |
Gente de razón | Totals |
1774 | 2,018 | 168 | 2,186 |
1798 | 1,194 | 775 | 1,969 |
1804 | 1,371 | 990 | 2,361 |
1818 | 1,094 | 1,931 | 3,025 |
1819 | 1,146 | 2,215 | 3,361 |
1820 | 1,127 | 2,291 | 3,418 |
Although the ratio of gente de razón to
mission Indians at Tumacácori was on the rise, and in 1820 stood
at three to five, only Tumacácori, San Xavier del Bac, and
Caborca still claimed on their rolls more Indians than non-Indians. If
the friars at Tumacácori and Bac counted their service as
presidial chaplains, their ratios too were upset in favor of the gente.
At the extreme, the missionaries of San Ignacio, where Father Estelric
had served previously, found themselves in 1820 ministering to 1,471
"Spaniards and mixbreeds" and only 47 Indians, an adverse ratio of
thirty-one to one! [7]
Declining Indian population always vexed the
missionaries. They had seen their charges dying off in epidemics and war
or fleeing back to heathendom. Others they knew deserted to the mines
and haciendas, became muleteers, or joined the army. In these ways they
"civilized" themselves, transposing themselves in the statistics from
indios to gente de razón, from the paternalistic care of the
friar to the real world outside. Increasingly Pápagos took the
places of the original Pimas in the missions, until, observed San
Ignacio's Fray Joseph Pérez in 1817, there was hardly a
legitimate Pima left. [8]
The going and the coming in the missions of
Pimería Alta lent weight to the friars' constant profession that
their establishments were conversiones vivas, actively propagating the
faith on a heathen frontier. It also explained in part why a century and
more after Father Kino the missionaries still lamented their charges'
spiritual backwardness, called them neophytes, and steadfastly opposed
secularization. There were always more Pápagos. [9]
Even had the times been tranquil, the influx of gente
de razón into semi-arid Pimería Alta would have put
mounting pressure on mission lands and water. In the turmoil of
insurrection and independence non-Indians were bound to take advantage
and move in.
After the infamous Pimería Alta scandals of
1815 and 1816, the viceroy had implored the Father Guardian of the
Querétaro college to assign as missionaries only the most
exemplary, virtuous, and prudent friars. Unfortunately, Juan Bautista
Estelric was none of these. Very soon his superiors had reports of his
imprudence. Worse would follow.
Apparently Estelric's chaplaincy at Tubac, where the
bishop had personally bestowed the faculties upon him, began peacefully
enough. He signed the burial entries for those who had died since
November, 1820, including young Tomás Ojeda, killed the first
week in December by Apaches at the mine called El Salero. [10] He married don Teodoro Ramírez of
Tucson and Serafina Quijada of Tubac. Don Teodoro, son of
Tumacácori's former interpreter, had just inherited the
possessions of his godfather, Fray Pedro de Arriquibar, recently
deceased chaplain of Tucson. And in February the tall, lank grayrobe
officiated at the wedding of don Tomás Ortiz, heir with his
brother to the Arivaca grant, and doña Joséfa Clementa
Elías González, daughter of Commandant Ignacio
Elías González. [11] Shortly
thereafter, Estelric and Elías quarreled angrily.
Don Ignacio, a Sonora criollo, formally denounced the
Spanish-born friar to Father Prefect Francisco Núñez, the
recruiter who had brought Estelric from Spain a decade earlier.
Núñez reported the altercation to Fray Faustino
González of Caborca. The balding González, chosen by the
superiors as Father President after the death of Francisco Moyano in
1818, had served as secretary during the indictments against
Creó, Fontbona, and Ruiz. He knew how damaging to the college
another scandal could be.
"Because of the illness of Father Estelric and his
phlegmatic nature," the Father President resolved to go to
Tumacácori himself. Appealing to their reason, he managed to calm
their passions and reconcile the two men. That summer Bishop
Espíritu Santo complimented him on his handling of the affair. "I
greatly appreciate it and trust that no further discord will be
arousedit is so dangerous in these times." [12]
The bishop was holding his breath. He and most of the
Mexican hierarchy, along with the superiors of the regular clergy,
fiercely opposed the anti-clerical measures issuing from the Spanish
Cortesattacks on the right of the church to own and acquire
property, plans to suppress the religious orders, abolition of clerical
immunity in criminal cases. Some of the prelates had joined with a cabal
of the privileged, men of means and station, peninsulares and criollos,
to insure their ruling position in an independent Mexico. This was
reaction, not revolution. If all went well they planned to offer a
Mexican throne to the abused Spanish king.
On February 24, 1821, the conspirators' tool, a wily
criollo officer named Agustín de Iturbide, proclaimed the
seductive Plan de Iguala with its three guaranteesimmediate and
total independence, equality of criollo and peninsular, and defense of
the one, true, and Catholic faith. The cry caught on. One after another,
government officials, military barracks, and bishops, even the
war-wearied old insurgents joined the chorus. Everywhere the people
turned out to cheer the Army of the Three Guarantees.
In late August, Commandant General Alejo
García Conde, hero of Piaxtla, embraced the Plan of Iguala and
decreed from Chihuahua that local authorities throughout the western
Provincias Internas do likewise. At Tucson, Lieutenant Colonel Arvizu,
who had also fought the rebels at Piaxtla, proclaimed his adherence on
September 3. Three days later Lieutenant Colonel Antonio Narbona led the
garrison of Arizpe in swearing the new allegiance. Intendant-Governor
Antonio Cordero refused and resigned. At Cieneguilla, where enthusiastic
royalists had burned Father Hidalgo in effigy a decade before, the
president of the town council tried to modify the oath. The military
convinced him otherwise. There was no stopping independence now.
A full month after General Iturbide had reached an
accord with the incoming Spanish viceroy, Bishop Espíritu Santo,
a royalist at heart, formally acknowledged the success of the
trigarante coalition. From his episcopal palace in Culiacan on
September 27, the very day Iturbide rode triumphantly into Mexico City,
the prelate of Sonora recommended to all his parishioners independence,
equality, and religion. What that meant for the missionaries of
Pimería Alta, they could only guess. [13]
Amid the shouting, Pérez' second payment for
the 4,000 Tumacácori cattle fell due. Father Estelric, who had
construction crews back on the church job, was counting on the money for
payroll and materials. When August 16, the due date, passed with no sign
of the two thousand pesos, the friar applied to don Rafael Elías.
When that brought no satisfaction Estelric wrote a one-thousand-peso
draft on don Ignacio Pérez in favor of Félix Antonio
Bustamante, citizen of Sombrerete, resident at Tumacácori, and
likely the master builder. In a firm letter, which Pérez later
described as so full of indignities he could hardly believe it, the
missionary told the cattle buyer that if he failed to honor the draft on
sight "I shall be forced to take other measures to recover the said sum
and meet my obligations, steps that will be for me most painful but
unavoidable." Pérez honored the draft. [14]
The other one thousand pesos, which Estelric demanded
be delivered at the mission immediately," Pérez sat on. Who could
tell what effect independence would have on the missions, on Spanish
currency, or on debts contracted with Spaniards before the Plan of
Iguala. Sadly depressed, the "phlegmatic" friar all but gave up. His
obligations and his conscience weighed too heavily. He was ill. He had
sinned. By late January, 1822, when the mail brought another episcopal
circular ordering public prayers for the well-being of independent
México, Estelric was too weak to sign. Instead, the man with whom
he had quarreled, Comandante Ignacio Elías of Tubac, signed for
him. [15]
Fray Francisco Núñez, the college's
comisario prefecto, had observed Mexico's progress toward independence
from Magdalena, where he had resided since the summer of 1821. The
following spring with his secretary Fray Ramón Liberós,
Núñez made his visitation of the missions, the first of
the Mexican period. Arriving at Tumacácori during holy week, the
comisario found the mission books in order but apparently little
else.
Father Estelric was still not well, work on the
church had been suspended, and ugly rumors were circulating again. The
three friars observed Easter Sunday, April 7, 1822. It was
Liberós' birthday. Though Father Prefect Núñez left
Estelric at Tumacácori and went on about his inspection, he had
decided to remove him. Late in May, Ramón Liberós returned
and took charge. Estelric had been told to report to Father President
González at Caborca. In a less-than-honest letter to Bishop
Espíritu Santo, González explained that Estelric had
declared himself "unable to carry the burden of that mission because of
his attacks." [16]
The Father President was trying to suppress another
scandal. The case of Juan Bautista Estelric involved more than physical
illness. By early December it had reached such proportions that
González felt obliged to inform the bishop fully, lest he learn
about it from someone else. The Father Prefect had removed Estelric from
Tumacácori on more serious grounds"the scandal he was
causing with a woman who attended him."
At Caborca the Father President had permitted the
seemingly repentant and sickly friar to live in the visita of Busanic.
Secretly Estelric had the woman brought to him there. Still struggling
to keep the affair quiet, Father Prefect Núñez simply
ordered her returned to her parents. In response to other rumors that
Estelric had embezzled assets belonging to Tumacácori, Father
President González rode to that mission a second time to
investigate. He turned up no irregularities.
Next Estelric had called the Father President to
confess him. He appeared moribund "or was pretending to be." After his
confession the ex-missionary of Tumacácori defended his conduct
with such detail and precision that he actually convinced
González that he had been framed, that he was the victim of
"malicious tongues." Filled with compassion for his maligned brother,
the Father President offered to assign him as compañero at
Cocóspera with spiritual responsibility for the Santa Cruz
garrison. Within two days Estelric asked for the pass, saying that he
would travel first to Pitic to consult a physician. Instead he went
straight to Santa Cruz.
Within a month the scandal was hotter than ever.
Estelric had made a deal to have a woman brought to him for a price.
Proceeding cautiously, Father President González verified that
fact. There were further rumors of a couple of children. González
put several friars on the case. They soon discovered that Estelric had
stashed away in various places "in money, in gold and silver blanks,
close to a thousand pesos, clothes, and superfluous things." As a
temporary measure the Father President ordered the accused to retire to
the mission of Sáric, there to abstain from saying Mass for
twelve days and to do spiritual exercises. Instead he feigned illness
and wrote to the bishop. [17]
Shocked by such presumption, Bishop Espíritu
Santo replied sternly. He would not under any circumstances contravene
the decision of Father President González and award Estelric the
chaplaincy at Santa Cruz. "Without doubt the conduct of Your Reverence
is unbefitting the holy habit you wear and the apostolic ministry you
exercise." [18] By November of 1824, the
fall of Juan Bautista Estelric seemed complete. By "secret communique" a
talebearing parish priest informed the bishop that Estelric "now has in
his company his woman of the notorious scandals. He goes about without
his habit, dressed like a layman." [19]
Yet he survived. By affiliating himself with the
Jalisco province he continued his ministry, such as it was, at
Mátape, Horcasitas, Bacadéguachi, and lastly at
Guásavas in east-central Sonora. Four years after most of his
Spanish brethren had been exiled, Fray Juan Bautista contributed a horse
and a fanega of wheat to a campaign against the Apaches. A priest to the
end, Estelric died at Guasávas, suddenly and without sacraments.
They buried him on December 29, 1835. He had just turned fifty-one. [20]
No one pushed Ramón Liberós around. If
don Ignacio Pérez hoped simply to forget his debt to the mission,
he was in for a jolt. If don Ignacio Elías González
thought he would have sport with the new friar from Spain, he misjudged
his man. In Father Liberós, Tumacácori finally had a
missionary to match the times.
Thirty-three years old, tall, blue-eyed, with light
complexion, sparse beard, and black hair, Fray Ramón looked like
an aristocrat. He was from Aragón, born April 7, 1789, in the
Villa de Mazaleón on the Río Matarraña. Though
subject to the archbishop of Zaragoza, Mazaleón lay seventy miles
southeast of that ancient city almost over into Catalonia, ancestral
home of the Liberós family. Five weeks past Ramón's
fifteenth birthday, the friars in the city of Calatayud received the
devout lad into the order. Four years later French soldiers marched in
the streets. Early in 1813 Father Liberós had traveled
crosscountry to the Mediterranean port of Alicante, and from there
booked a passage, which included thirty-one days in port because of
stormy seas, south through the Straits to Cádiz. With Father
Núñez and five others he had finally boarded the frigate
San José alias El Comercio sailing July 16, 1813,
the last and least troublesome contingent of that ill-starred
mission.
In Pimería Alta, Liberós became the
neighbor of two of his former shipmates. The pock-marked
valenciano Juan Vañó ministered at San Xavier del
Bac. Late in 1820 after the demise of Father Arriquibar, he had been
obliged to take over the presidio of Tucson as well. Unfortunately
Vañó was not as tough as Liberós. At
Cocóspera within a day's ride Fray Ramón had his friend
Francisco Solano García, a cordobés, light-skinned
with black hair and black eyes. [21]
The debts, embezzlements, and sexual adventures of
Juan Bautista Estelric put his successor at a disadvantage. He had to be
above suspicion. With Father García as moral support Ramón
Liberós took on Tumacácori and Tubac late in May of 1822.
[22] He wasted no time.
|
Father Liberós collects a debt,
September 14, 1823. Courtesy the Bancroft Library
|
Examining the papers in the mission archive, he came
upon the cattle sale contract. He wrote immediately, addressing don
Ignacio Pérez, a member of the Third Order of Saint Francis, as
brother. "I greet you most warmly, and inform you that I am now in
charge of this mission." He begged the would-be cattle baron to pay the
overdue one thousand pesos at once and the remaining six thousand as
soon as possible. "The mission," Liberós explained, "needs the
money to continue its building program. It was for this reason that the
cattle were sold."
It was not that easy. For the next sixteen months the
strong-minded Tumacácori friar dunned the wily debtor, countering
his every ploy, till finally Pérez had to give up and sell part
of his herd. Don Ignacio had tried selling Liberós blankets and
sarapes at wholesale, had requested extensions because of alleged family
and financial woes, had cajoled the friar's emissaries and had invited
him to be patient until cattle prices rose. Fray Ramón would have
none of it.
While Pérez stalled, and was promoted twice,
Agustín de Iturbide had himself proclaimed emperor of Mexico,
paraded around in gold and silver braid for a year, then yielded to a
potpourri of republicans, military opportunists, and the disenchanted of
every stripe. No one knew how the emerging anti-clericalism or the
hatred of Spaniards would affect the missions. With finance and politics
in chaos, Pérez saw no reason to hurry payment. But
Liberós, goaded by the pathetic sight of Tumacácori's
unfinished church, refused to be put off. "I shall come to Chihuahua,
Durango, Mexico City, or wherever I must if you continue deaf and
oblivious to my supplications." By September, 1823, don Rafael
Elías had guaranteed payment of the entire outstanding balance
plus collection costs. The friar had won. [23]
|
The Tumacácori church: floor plan
and details. Courtesy National Park Service
|
As far as Liberós was concerned, if the church
at Tumacácori did not rival those of San Xavier or Caborca, by
the grace of God it would serve. The insurrection, forced loans, and
uncertainty about the future had rendered the original splendid plan of
Narciso Gutiérrez an impossible dream. Whether by order of
Gutiérrez himself, Estelric, or Liberós, the transept was
closed up on both sides, leaving the nave a simple rectangle. Unfired
adobes, easier and cheaper, heightened the walls course by course, with
fired brick reserved for capping and other points of stress and for
decoration. The hope of twin bell towers vanished: one on the right
containing the baptistry at ground level would suffice. Instead of a
barrel vault or a series of domes the nave walls at Tumacácori
would carry a flat roof. [24]
To Ramón Liberós the distasteful
business of debt collecting was a lesser evil than a mission without a
church. Confidently he went ahead with construction. On October 1, 1822,
he blessed a large, walled cemetery immediately behind the new church.
The same day in the place reserved for children he buried María
Teresa González, five-year-old daughter of a Pima couple. He
headed a fresh page of the burial book CEMENTERIO NUEBO and began
numbering again from one. At the foot of that page Liberós noted
a particularly solemn event.
Despite the scaffolding and piles of brick still
evident on all sides, Tumacácori's massive new church could at
last be put to use. Evidently the dome over the sanctuary was finished,
the nave roofed, and the planned bell tower unnecessary at this stage.
As the second anniversary of Fray Narciso Gutiérrez lonely death
approached, Father Liberós scheduled the event. That day, Friday
the thirteenth of December, with all due ceremony he removed the
remaining of Fathers Carrillo and Gutiérrezwho between them
had served the mission forty yearsfrom the old dilapidated church,
and had them borne to the new one. Beneath the floor of the sanctuary on
the Gospel side he reburied them. Though Narciso Gutiérrez had
not entered his new church in joyful procession. at least his mortal
remains now rested within the walls he had begun two decades before. And
though they never would finish it, the Franciscans finally had a church.
[25]
As he baptized their newborn, married their lovers,
and buried their dead, Ramón Liberós came to know them
all, Indians, Spaniards, and half-breeds. The new friar, devout and
energetic, seemed above scandal which was something of a relief. He
earned their respect if not their attention to religious duty. He met
and apparently did not quarrel with the recently promoted Captain
Ignacio Elías González of Tubac. On the feast of Saint
Francis, October 4, 1822, while Elías and his wife doña
María Soledad Grijalva stood as godparents, Liberós
insisted that visiting Fray Juan Vañó of San Xavier and
Tucson baptize a three-year-old Apache girl, naming her Francisca
Vañó.
The new friar worked effectively through mission
foreman José Antonio Orozco, who with his wife Gertrudis Sosa was
among the community's more popular godparents. The number of gente de
razón who looked to Father Ramón continued to increase as
old families resettled and new ones moved in on neighboring lands. He
officiated at more baptisms than last rites. From the ranchos of
Buenavista, Santa Bárbara, and San Lázaro south of
Guevavi, and from Arivaca to the west they came in or sent word to him.
One wonders if don Francisco Perea of the Bernalillo, New Mexico, rico
family was looking into old mines in the area when he died at the rancho
of Arivaca late in August, 1822.
Ramón Pamplona, the friar's tocayo,
held the cane of office as the mission's native governor. Born at
Tumacácori early in the morning on August 30, 1785, legitimate
son of Miguel Antonio Pamplona, a Pápago, and Josépha
Ocoboa, a Yaqui, the future governor had been baptized Raimundo next day
by Fray Baltazar Carrillo. The infant's brothers and sisters died almost
as fast as they were born. When he was seven his father, still only
"about twenty-four," sickened and died. Eight months later his mother
married Juan José Zúñiga, a Pápago widower
about thirty.
|
Arivaca. From Sonora Silver Mining
Company, Report
|
On Fray Narciso Gutiérrez' 1801 census the
sixteen-year-old Ramón Pamplona, listed as fourteen and a Pima,
showed up with his stepfather and his mother, her only surviving child.
On May 4, 1803, he married Gertrudis Medina, a Tumacácori Pima,
thirteen. By her during the next eighteen years he had several children,
at least two of whom died in infancy. Pamplona had been a member of the
land grant delegation to Arizpe late in 1806. In June, 1821, Fray Juan
Bautista Estelric buried his first wife and seven weeks later married
him to his second, María Leocadia Castillo of Tucson.
Liberós baptized the couple's first child, Ignacio, on August 1,
1822, and buried him eighteen days later. [26]
Father Liberós learned to live with the
uncertainties of the times. Still, he must have pondered the bishop's
reason in 1822 for requesting an inventory of all the silver objects in
the mission churches of Pimería Alta. Forced loan?
Secularization? At the bidding of Father President González the
friars complied, listing each item and its weight. The total came to 489
marks four ounces. Sáric was by far the poorest in silver, with
just under twenty marks. Surprisingly, San Xavier del Bac, with its
grand church and its visita of Tucson, ranked next poorest with
thirty-five marks. Richest in silver was Tubutama which possessed a
single magnificent altar lamp weighing forty-five marks.
Tumácacori's church silver as itemized by Liberós added up
to thirty-five marks three ounces and included monstrance, chalice with
paten, censer and incensory, image (paz), small plate and altar
bell, cross, six medium-sized candlesticks, medium-sized cross and the
base of another, baptismal shell, small box with cruets and
chrismatories. By the end of the year Bishop Espíritu Santo had
the figures. [27]
As stewards of their missions' temporal estates,
Ramón Liberós and his fellow friars were expected to take
the Indians' part in land litigation, to defend the integrity of mission
grants against a growing number of non-Indian claimants. In September,
1820, the Arivaca heirs, don Tomás and don Ignacio Ortiz, had
petitioned the intendant-governor for a new estancia grant twice as
large north of Tubac. They wanted four sitios, of one league each,
centering on the place called La Canoa. Nine months later the
authorities in Arizpe admitted the petition and ordered Commander
Elías of Tubac to proceed in the matter.
Swearing in his survey teamLieutenant Manuel de
León, surveyor of the Tumacácori grant fourteen years
before, José Antonio Figueroa, Juan José Orosco, and
Manuel CastroElías had supervised the laying out of the
grant in July 1821 and its appraisal at thirty pesos a sitio, or one
hundred and twenty pesos for the entire claim. Back at Tubac he formally
announced the initial auction as required by law. For thirty consecutive
days, from July 14 through August 12, the drums were beaten in the Tubac
plaza and Reyes Cruz cried the four sitios in favor of the Ortiz
brothers at thirty pesos a sitio. Not until the final day did a rival
bidder appear. It was Fray Juan Vañó of San Xavier.
As surveyed, the Canoa grant for about ten miles
bounded on the west the mission lands of San Xavier. Father
Vañó, pressured by gente de razón in the Tucson
area, hoped to acquire La Canoa as an additional estancia for the
mission's thousands of head of stock. Representing Javier Ignacio
Sánchez and Francisco Flores, who accompanied him, and all the
other people of San Xavier del Bac, Fray Juan began bidding against the
Ortiz brothers. Apparently they did not expect him to stay beyond fifty
pesos a sitio. When he bid 52-1/2, they dropped out.
After Elías had heard the testimony of three
witnesses vouching for Fray Juan's ability to stock the grant, he
forwarded the proceedings to Arizpe. The final three-day auction was set
in the capital for December 13, 14, and 15, 1821. On the third day the
agent of the Ortiz brothers reopened the bidding against the agent of
Father Vanó. This time, when the bid reached 62-1/2 pesos per
sitio, the Franciscan's agent dropped out. Four days later Tomás
and Ignacio Ortiz owned the Canoa grant. Juan Vanó had tried. [28]
|
The nineteenth-century Babocómari
Ranch, near the hacienda of Ortiz. Courtesy Arizona Historical
Society
|
At Tumacácori the "phlegmatic" Father
Estelric, who sold off most of the mission's cattle, had evidently paid
little attention when don León Herreros of Tubac laid claim by
denuncia to the abandoned lands of Sonoita, until 1773 a visita of
Tumacácori. Comandante Elías in June, 1821, had surveyed
one and three-quarters sitios along Sonoita Creek, appraised because of
available water at sixty pesos a sitio. Herreros had closed the deal in
November.
The following year the mission Indians complained to
their new friar, the tall, blue-eyed Liberós. Herreros' stock was
invading their fields in the lower canyon of Sonoita Creek southeast of
Tumacácori. Father Liberós prepared their case. He
presented documentation to show that former Intendant-Governor
García Conde had granted the mission community not only fundo and
estancia as surveyed in 1807, but additional lands both to the east and
to the south, the old Jesuit purchases.
Confronted by Liberós, don León
Herreros assured the forceful Franciscan that he had not meant to
encroach. When measuring the claim the surveyors had descended the
canyon from the ruins of Sonoita as far as the two small hills called
Los Cuates, today Twin Buttes. Observing the boundaries of the mission's
fundo and estancia, but unaware of the additional lands, they "believed
that far from encroaching on the Tumacácori grant there existed
between an unclaimed void of about a league more or less."
Father Liberós and don León settled out
of court. Appearing before Captain Elías and witnesses at Tubac
on January 10, 1823, they agreed to draw the dividing line at the hill
known as the Loma de las Cruces. Herreros retained the right to run
stock downcanyon, guaranteeing in turn the Indians' exclusive right to
farm the arable land in the lower canyon. Four years later the same
parties would appear before Judge Trinidad Irigoyen to attest the
transfer of "the rancho of Sonoita" to the mission. But because the deal
was never recorded in Arizpe, and because Liberós and the other
Spanish friars were expelled in 1828, don León would retain title
and sell the grant again in 1831 to Joaquín Vicente Elías
for two hundred fanegas of wheat. [29]
By the spring of 1823 Father Ramón's motley
flock, what with mission, presidio, and scattered ranchos, must have
numbered some six or seven hundred souls. He could handle the hardest of
them when it came to debts or land encroachments, but spiritually some
of them tried him almost beyond endurance. Their inattention even to
annual confession and communion made the friar want to cry out for
deliverance from this Babylon.
"I have not ceased," he professed to the bishop in
despair, "insofar as it has been possible for me, to guide them along
the path of salvation. Yet some, unmindful of the end for which God Our
Lord created them, live as if they were not Christians and scorn the
precepts of Our Holy Mother Church." From the pulpit and in private he
had admonished them. "And the result has been scorn, babbling, and a
reluctance to confess." There were those, he blurted out, who had not
confessed for seven or eight years! [30]
The bishop answered promptly. He had little patience
with knowing transgressors. Father Liberós must formally admonish
at Mass on three feast days all who had not fulfilled their annual
obligations, giving them two months to comply. If that failed to move
them, he was to excommunicate them and post their names on the doors of
the church. "If even then they do not submit obediently to the mandates
of Our Holy Mother Church you will intensify and reintensify the censure
to the point of anathema." Although the Third Mexican Council had denied
parish priests the faculty of absolving the contrite and repentant of
anathema, the bishop conceded it to Liberós for the time being.
[31]
But then Bishop Espíritu Santo did not have to
live with these people.
Twice early in 1824 Liberós left
Tumacácori, and twice an unfortunate soul died without the
sacraments. During February, with a license from Father President
González, he may have traveled to Arizpe on business. He had
given don Rafael Elías until May 14 to pay the balance6,366
pesos four realesowing for the mission cattle. Then during Lent,
Fray Ramón rode north to San Xavier del Bac to confess and do his
annual spiritual exercises with his neighbor Juan Vanó. By
mid-June a helper had come to Tumacácori, Liberós' first
and last compañero.
Only twenty-eight, Fray Juan Maldonado had the
advantage of being Mexican. A native of Querétaro, born November
24, 1795, Maldonado had joined the order at the convento of Nuestra
Señora del Pueblito in 1812 and four years later, at the height
of the scandals, transferred to the college. He stayed at
Tumacácori only about six months. [32]
Every muleteer brought word of new crises. The
liberator and ex-emperor Agustín de Iturbide, ill-served by his
advisers, had returned from exile and died in front of a firing squad,
but his legacy of military coup, opportunism, and disregard for law
lived on in the hearts of his countrymen. A liberal congress had pasted
together a federalist constitution which reversed overnight three
hundred years of centralist rule. Sonora had no sooner been joined to
more populous Sinaloa in the Estado Libre de Occidente when Sonorans
began espousing separatism and self-destiny. Behind closed doors, in
homes, shops, offices, wherever the upper and informed classes met, the
same issues were argued: King or president? Centralism or localism? The
one true faith or religious toleration? Abide the Spaniards or expel
them? Confiscate the missions or let them be?
Though the 1825 constitution of the Estado de
Occidente declared Apostolic Roman Catholicism the only acceptable
religion, it made no mention of the missions. They simply did not fit
the liberal, egalitarian mold. As vestiges of Spanish colonialism,
manned largely by Spaniards, no longer protected by Spanish law and
tradition, they were more vulnerable now than ever. They survived only
by the grace of inertia.
Spain had chosen not to recognize the independence of
her erstwhile colony. In retaliation Mexicans trampled Iturbide's
pragmatic guarantee of equality for Spaniards, designed to enlist their
support in consummating independence. It had served. Many peninsulares
fled persecution in Mexico taking their skills and their wealth with
them. The republic passed repressive laws against those who remained. As
the tide of hispanophobia rose, the missions more covetous neighbors
began to help themselves.
When Juan Vanó moved down from San Xavier to
San Ignacio to assume the job of Father President in 1824, he found
himself practically engulfed. With no more than a few dozen mission
Indians in the midst of 1,500 gente de razón, he was helpless to
prevent encroachment. The settlers treated him with contempt, moving in
to peddle their vicesaguardiente, gambling, whoring, and mockery
of law and order. Early in 1825 the vice governor of the state, having
heard about conditions in Pimería Alta, took it upon himself to
lecture the constitutional alcaldes, and the missionaries, on the
responsibilities of liberty. "It is not libertinism or a relaxation of
custom. . . . I urge very especially the Reverend Father Missionaries to
punish and correct public scandals and to insure that subordination and
respect due their station." How, Father President Vanó wanted to
know. [33]
Some government officials kept on paying lip service
to the missions, but certainly no money. As if to set accounts straight,
someone in the treasury office in Arizpe went to the trouble of adding
up what the Mexican republic, as heir to the Spanish crown, owed the
missions of Pimería Alta as of January 1, 1825. It came to 33,642
pesos, two reales, six granos. The figure did not include the cost of
provisions supplied to the presidios and the army by the missions, of
which there was no record.
Tumacácori had not received the 350-peso
annual subsidy for eleven years, or its share of the 8,000 pesos
deposited for the college in the treasury back in 1813. A forced
purchase of lottery tickets in the spring of 1817 added another 120
pesos. When a three-percent tax levied in support of the Mexican Church
Council was deducted, the treasury admitted a debt to Tumacácori
on paper of over 4,400 pesos. But Father Liberós never saw one
peso of it. [34]
The college suffered too. Fray Ángel Alonso de
Prado, the last Queretaran recruiter sent by the superiors to Spain, had
secured on December 20, 1819, royal approval to collect a mission of
thirty priests and two lay brothers. But before he had half a dozen
signed up, the Spanish liberal revolt of 1820 threw the country into
chaos. The next year Mexico cast off from troubled Spain. When Prado
returned to Querétaro late in 1822 he brought with him only four
recruits "who served little or not at all in the ministry." In 1823 the
community elected Prado Father Guardian for the third time. He died in
office. The next regularly elected guardian, ex-Father Prefect Francisco
Núñez, was forced to retire after only three months by a
Mexican decree against Spaniards holding office. That precipitated a
crisis from which the mother college never fully recovered.
Because Núñez had been elected
canonically and deposed by civil authority of the Mexican government,
the friars, at least the Spanish majority, refused to recognize his
dismissal. That irked the criollo minority. When the Spaniards chose old
Fray Diego Bringas, the college's most illustrious American-born son, as
Father Presidentnot guardianthe criollos boiled. In
sentiment Bringas was more Spanish than the king. The criollos felt
cheatedand on their own soil. They counted up the number of
Mexican-born candidates who had been refused admission, and charged
discrimination. Outside the walls the people had begun shouting slogans
against all Spaniards. Inside, when three criollo friars roughed up
Father Bringas in his own cell, the Spanish friars, and Bringas, began
thinking of home. The community had broken asunder. [35]
The friars in the missions knew what was going on.
Even before the Mexicans deposed Guardian Núñez,
Ramón Liberós had threatened to quit. Writing late in 1825
to an unnamed fellow missionary, probably Miguel Montes of Oquitoa, he
confided his discontent.
Already I had word that Father Faustino
[González] wanted to leave us stripped to the buff. The things
our good college does! Instead of sending to the missions it takes from
them. At this rate too it may even find itself without Father
Ramón. Since the college could not care less about the
missionaries of Sonora, it is not surprising that they care less about
the college. [36]
Father Ramón had another complaint. The
Apaches, after a generation of relative calm, seemed to have again taken
the offensive. Not that all of them had ever observed the peace or
accepted welfare, but enough had to lower the intensity of the war from
its peak in the 1770s and 1780s. Enlisting the "tame Apaches" as
auxiliaries and scouts, the presidial garrisons, who never ceased
campaigning, had held the hostiles pretty much at bay. But in the welter
of insurrection and independence, the dole reached the Apache peace
camps less regularly and sometimes not at all. Some warriors shook off
the effects of wardship and returned to the mountains. Others tried to
play it both ways, to be Apaches de paz one week and Apaches
de guerra the next. As ranchers like Ignacio Pérez moved
their herds out onto sprawling new grants and closer to hostile
territory, depredations mounted.
When Apaches ran off a bunch of Tumacácori
horses on All Saints' Day, November 1, 1824, Father Ramón had no
illusions of swift retaliation. As chaplain at Tubac he knew all too
well the sorry state of the garrison. The Pimas of the pueblo had taken
off in pursuit without waiting for acting post commander Teodoro Aros to
marshal the presidio. When he did, the force amounted to three soldiers
and four civilians. The local alcalde said there were no horses on which
to mount the citizens. "I could not force them to go afoot," fumed
Aros.
It made him mad, the whole thing. Only Lieutenant
José Rosario, besides he himself, was fit to lead. And they had
no one to lead. What did his superiors expect? With his dander up, Aros
wrote Commandant General Mariano de Urrea. The presidial horse herd
would be next. Who was supposed to command the guard detail? "I have it
for life since the carabineer cannot be trusted . . . because he is so
negligent and so dense that even when the most exact orders are given to
him and precautions taken to assure the fulfillment of his duties, it
amounts to nothing."
Again the Tubac garrison was scattered all over the
place. Sergeant Antonio Ramírez had helped quell an Ópata
uprising in September. Ensign Rafael Arriola and eighteen infantrymen
were in Arizpe about to join a campaign against the Coyotero Apaches.
"Unless Your Lordship releases the officers of this company who are in
the capital, I think that in no time we will have no horse herd at
all."
In conclusion Aros told what had almost
happenedbut for divine providencewhen the dunderheaded
carabineer was guarding the horses.
The Apaches have actually been in the horse herd
guard. They have seen them all asleep. They did not kill them because
God did not will it. They themselves told the Apaches de paz that it was
because they had no lances that they did not kill them, for all the scum
were asleep. They had not stolen the horse herd because they had come
looking for their friends. [37]
A couple of months later Chief Antuna and
twenty-seven of his Apaches de paz of Tucson relieved some enemy Apaches
of seventeen animals stolen from don León Herreros' Sonoita
ranch. But when a hungry band allegedly from the same camp came upon a
vaquero from Arivaca with a couple of cattle tied together horn to horn,
they appropriated the animals, slaughtered them on the spot, and carried
the meat to their rancherías. [38]
Naturally Liberós was concerned. "You may know
by now," he told his friend, "that on Thursday night [November 17, 1825]
the Apaches attacked Santa Bárbara," south of Guevavi. Because
there happened to be plenty of people around at the time, the marauders
did no more damage than wound a vaquero, kill a horse, and steal a
couple of trunks of clothing belonging to some travelers. The same night
about twenty approached Tumacácori and stole a little thrashed
wheat left in the fields by the Pimas. But on Saturday the commandant at
Tubac had warned Liberós that two large war parties were in the
area. One was headed their way. "Who knows what will happen?" [39]
For all the old reasonsterritorial expansion,
supply and trade, defense against hostile Indians and foreign
interlopers, even conversion of the heathenthe rulers of
independent Mexico fancied a highway between Sonora and California.
Diplomacy with the tribes of the Gila and Colorado Rivers again took on
all the urgency of Garcés' and Anza's day.
In the spring of 1823 a Dominican missionary of Baja
California, Father Félix Caballero, had crossed the lower
Colorado in Cócopa territory and reported to Antonio Narbona in
Arizpe. A squad of eleven men under Brevet Captain José Romero
left Tucson in the searing heat of June to escort the friar back and to
reopen the way to Monterey. Skirting the formidable Yumas and relying on
their enemies, the party had crossed downriver and made it to
California, where Romero found himself detained for two and a half
years. Back at Tucson a rumor had it that all hands had been killed by
the Yumas. [40]
|
Diorama showing Captain José
Romero and Father Felix Caballero as they prepare to leave Tucson for
California, 1823. Courtesy Arizona Historical Society
|
The Gila Pimas had watched Romero pass. A visit from
Father Prefect Francisco Núñez in 1823 had stirred in them
the old hopes of whatever benefits baptism might bring. "Battered by the
enemy Apaches," they were clamoring again. From Tucson Pedro
Ríos, who had served as interpreter not only for
Núñez but also for Father Bringas in 1795, informed
Commandant General Urrea that these Gileños wanted to know why,
after so many promises, no missionaries had come to live with them and
to baptize their children. Ríos himself claimed to have baptized
many in danger of death. He appealed to Urrea to pass on the
Gileños' pleas to the proper authorities, and in the meantime to
send them the dozen hoes they had asked for. [41]
Urrea agreed. He saw the Gileños as the key to
northwestward expansion. They were friends of the Cocomaricopas and
Halchidhomas and enemies of Apaches to the east and Yumas to the west.
If the Mexicans could arrange a peace with the Yumas and unite all the
tribes of the Gila and Colorado against the Apaches, colonization and
the road to California would be assured. Straightaway he summoned native
leaders to Arizpe to make the necessary treaties. Twenty-seven
Gileños showed, but not one Yuma.
The commandant had nothing but praise for the Gila
Pimas. They had consistently sought conversion. They lived in fixed
rancherías. They irrigated their wheat, maize, beans, and cotton
"by means of their check dam of staked logs that the flood of the river
carries down to them each year." He stressed their trade with Tucson,
Tubac, and the rest of the frontier. A ready market existed for their
cotton cloth, skillfully woven on horizontal stake looms, for their
beautiful cat-claw baskets, and for the deerskins they prepared. With
modern tools and technical training, Urrea believed, their production
and trade could be greatly increased. But most of all they must be
brought to a knowledge of God.
Receiving the visiting Gileño principales
graciously, Urrea confirmed them in office as justicias and gave them
provisions. They asked for canes of office, and he promised to send them
along later. He did not have the money to buy them, he told the vice
governor. For the benefit of the government the commandant listed the
Gila Pimas according to rancherías, padding the total with some
Pápagos and Cocomaricopas: [42]
Rancherías |
Distances in leagues |
Population |
Buen Llano | 36 from Tucson | 400 |
El Hormiguero | 1 from no. 1 | 1,200 |
La Tierra Amontonada | 3/4 from no. 2 | 1,200 |
El Apache Parado | 1 from no. 3 | 600 |
La Agua | 1-1/2 from no. 4 | 600 |
El Ojo del Agua | 14 from no. 5 | 2,000 |
Altar | 1 from no. 6 | 2,000 |
La Aquituni | 7 so. of the Gila | 300 |
El Hueso Parado de Pimas y Cocomaricopas | 15 from no. 8 |
900 |
|
| 9,200 |
Politics, the tumultuous internal power struggle that
gripped Sonora for most of the nineteenth century, now burst the
expansionists' bubble. Mariano de Urrea, who had twice in 1824 defied
orders from Mexico City to surrender his dual military and political
chieftanship in Sonora and Sinaloa, yielded civil authority to the new
Estado de Occidente but refused to step down as the state's commandant
general. In true caudillo style he ordered his officers to pronounce
against the national government and to resist General José de
Figueroa, dispatched to remove him. But Figueroa proved more than a
match for Urrea. By the summer of 1825 don Mariano was on the road to
Mexico City under guard, charged with defiance of the federal
government, inciting the Indians, and attempting to set himself up as an
independent "King of Sonora." [43]
|
Baskets and pottery of the Pimas and
Cocomaricopas. From Bartlett, Personal Narrative, II
|
Figueroa tried to pick up the Gila Pimas, the Yumas,
and the road to California where Urrea had dropped them. Writing to the
authorities in Mexico City, the general assured them in August that they
could "count on the friendship of the Gileños, Cocomaricopas, and
Yumas because for many years they have lived in peace without committing
hostilities on our frontiers. They are of a peaceful character and most
inclined to live in society." A liberal, Figueroa saw the salvation of
these "wretched beings" not in baptism but in education. He would,
however, do all he could to support new missions when missionaries were
assigned.
The outlander identified certain requisites to
regular intercourse between Sonora and Alta California: (1) a chain of
military posts along a two-hundred-league stretch of desert frontier;
(2) the acquisition of a thorough preliminary knowledge of terrain and
Indians on the route, recognizing that many, especially the fearsome,
numerous, and unregenerate Apaches, were hostile; and (3) protection for
new missions. At the same time he criticized his predecessor for not
waging active war against the Apaches; vowed to fight the traffic in
Indian captives; and proposed "a formal and respectable expedition" to
escort José Romero back from Alta California, reconnoiter the
route, and make peace between the tribes. [44]
To the south at Fuerte, temporary capital of the
Estado de Occidente, Governor Simón Elías González
was proposing for the Gila Pimas "a new system of missions in this part
of the United Mexican States where the one adopted by the Spanish
government caused the tragedy of the Río Colorado and still feeds
the backwardness of Pimería Alta." His eleven-point reform, a
curious mixture of experience and naiveté, presupposed conditions
that did not exist. The government was not solvent, nor the friars
eager. The Gileños were not conveniently isolated or free of the
Yumas' "greed." Besides, no two politicos could agree on any
eleven points.
First, taking a page from Francisco Garcés,
Elías urged a gradual approach to the Gileños. Two
Queretaran priests and two lay brothers should be assigned to mission
San Xavier del Bac. There in the company of the resident friar they
would learn the language, work with Gileño children, and at
opportune times of the year visit the rest of the tribe. They must go
alone, unaccompanied by soldiers or settlers or interpreters, in the
true manner of apostles. Then, among those who accepted them, they would
build a small but sturdy settlement, the embodiment of religion and
civil society, and move in. Communal property and communal labor were
strictly forbiddenthey must instead find better means of
generating funds and a new name for the work required to build the
chapel, school, and other structures.
The government, according to the Elías plan,
was to provide all necessary aidtools, gifts, and the annual
stipend, which the missionaries in Pimería Alta had not seen in
yearsas well as close supervision. The state would assist in
appointing qualified friars, provide them with regulations and forms for
periodic reports, and determine when and what the "mission" was to
become after the missionaries' job was done. During their tenure the
friars must encourage arts and trades, "carpentry, iron working,
weaving, ceramics, and the rest." Under no circumstances were the friars
to get mixed up in the wars of their charges. [45]
In mid-November 1825, General Figueroa met the Yumas
on their own ground. He had marched out from Tucson at the head of a
respectable expedition of four hundred men. Now the Mexican force faced
"4,000" menacing Yumas across the Río Colorado. Figueroa sent
emissaries. The principal, Carga Muchachas (He Molests Girls), and a
large following crossed over to parley. In exchange for gifts he gladly
made peace and agreed to deliver dispatches to Romero who was finally on
the way from California.
Just then bad news reached the general. The Yaquis
had rebelled. Again the internal convulsions of Sonora wrecked the
expansionists' plans. Instead of awaiting Romero on the Colorado,
Figueroa marched back double time the way he had come. [46]
Ramón Liberós took the events of 1825
in stride. He was not one to panic. After he had described for his
unnamed friend the Apache menace the rest of his letter was almost
breezy. He went on about stolen and strayed horses and mentioned a trip
he planned to take, "God willing, this coming year after Epiphany." He
knew about the Yaqui revolt and Figueroa's retreat from the Río
Colorado. "Now that they say the troops are coming from the Colorado, my
Pimas have not a care in the world. They are dancing vigorously and
practicing for the matachines. Already they do it well,
especially your compadre Cayetano." Father Ramón invited his
friend to come to Tumacácori and preach, and he offered to send
an escort. After a final slap at Father Faustino González,
Liberós initialed the personal note and gave it to an Indian to
deliver. [47]
Liberós already had one house guest. Fray
Rafael Díaz, Juan Vañó's replacement at San Xavier
and Tucson in 1824, had been carried to Tumacácori desperately
ill. While he lay abed three women of the Tucson presidio died without
the sacraments. Fearing that he might be charged unjustly with
neglecting his duties, Díaz asked three of the community's
leading citizens to testify in his behalf. The week of November 20,
1825, acting commandant Brevet Captain Manuel de León, surveyor
of the Tumacácori grant in 1807, don Teodoro Ramírez, and
Alcalde Constitucional José León all signed identical
statements for the bishop praising Rafael Díaz as a pastor.
Willingly he risked his life, coming out from San
Xavier "at all hours of the night" to hear a confession. Once when he
was totally paralyzed he had insisted that they carry him in a sedan
chair to the side of a sick woman. As for the three who had died while
Díaz lay indisposed at Tumacácori, death had claimed one
suddenly and the other two had been remiss in not summoning
Liberós. In other words, their dying without the sacraments was
not Díaz' fault. [48]
In 1826 another of the periodic "universal" epidemics
swept Pimería Alta, ten years after the last one. Identified as
measles, it ravaged the missions, killing off "a large part" of the
neophytes. At Tumacácori Ramón Liberós emerged with
only eighteen families plus a few children whom he cared for in the
convento. [49]
Later that year Father Ramón heard a rumor
that was soon confirmed. Americanos had descended the Gila as far
as the Gileño and Cocomaricopa rancherías. A Gila Pima
governor had told Captain León of Tucson. León had
dispatched Brevet Lieutenant Antonio Comadurán with a small
party, including Tucson Alcalde Ignacio Pacheco.
On the Gila Pacheco called a council of the
principales. The Indians said that the sixteen armed foreigners, three
of whom spoke Spanish, had come only to investigate the possibilities of
beaver hunting and trade. They had done no harm. They had given the
Indians gifts. They had departed after four days. They had claimed to
have the permission of Antonio Narbona, now governor of New Mexico. That
fact the Mexicans were able to verify, thanks to the Cocomaricopas'
theft of a valise belonging to the American "captain." It contained a
passport issued by Narbona in Santa Fe, August 29, 1826, to S. W. "Old
Bill" Williams, Ceran St. Vrain, and thirty-five others. [50]
The following December a couple of Indians came down
from the Gila to Tucson to report two more companies of American
trappers. Because of threats from the Cocomaricopas, the Americans had
gone back the way they had come in. But now there was bad blood between
the Cocomaricopas, who wanted to kill the foreigners, and the
Pápagos who refused to let them. The two Indian emissaries asked
the Mexican authorities at Tucson to forbid any more Americans to enter.
In response Captain León gave them a paper ordering any and all
foreigners to proceed no farther but to present themselves in
Tucson.
Almost immediately the order brought results. On the
last day of 1826 three unidentified americanos showed up at Tucson, the
first recorded visit of United States citizens to Hispanic Arizona. They
had been shown the captain's order by some Pápagos. They had come
to present their passports. Although León likely explained to
them that they were unwelcome in the Estado de Occidente, he evidently
did not prevent them from returning to New Mexico. [51]
It was difficult to see manifest destiny in this
trio. Still, Anglo-American penetration had begun. From 1826 on, a
drifting array of trappers and traders, bounty hunters and filibusters
wandered in and out of the Santa Cruz Valley. Thirty years later the
United States Army would raise the stars and stripes over Tucson.
Of more immediate concern to Mexican residents of the
valley in 1827 was the Yaqui scare. A dispatch from the commandant of
Tubac in "La Canatua" and warnings from the Apache leaders Antuna and
José de Santa Cruz had the people of Tucson worried. Yaqui rebels
were reported ready to attack the post. If they should win over as
allies Pápagos, Yumas, and the Coyotero Apaches "who attack us
most months," there would be no stopping them. Most of the garrison had
gone south to fight Yaquis. Hastily, "in harmony and in patriotism," the
citizens of Tucson rallied to repair the presidial wall. The attack
never came. The Yaquis surrendered to General Figueroa three hundred and
fifty miles away. [52]
With what he could scrape together Father
Liberós kept working on the Tumacácori church. But to him
and to the other Spanish friars it now seemed only a matter of time.
Their college, rent from within, offered them no support. The politicos
of the Estado de Occidente, intent on their own intrigues, could not
agree on what to do with the missions, to tolerate them as buffers
against hostile Apaches or to suppress them and enjoy the fruits of
their Indians. Spain still refused to recognize independent Mexico. It
was rumored in fact that Ferdinand VII, restored again to his absolutist
throne by foreign intervention, had resolved to reconquer New Spain.
When the currents of sentiment against Spaniards and against the
missions flowed together, the Queretaran friars of Pimería Alta
were sure to drown in the flood.
Five days before Christmas of 1827 the federal
congress passed the expected law expelling Spaniards from Mexico. The
states followed suit. Though most of the Spanish friars residing at the
college in Querétaro would have qualified as exceptions because
of age, poor health, or useful vocation, they had decided "with profound
regret" to leave. Most in fact had anticipated the decree and made for
Vera Cruz several months before. Fray Diego Bringas, known as an
irreconcilable royalist from California to Tehuantepec, went with
them.
Hardly had the overcrowded British frigate cleared
port with its motley cargo of rich merchants and poor clerks,
shopkeepers, artisans, soldiers, and friars, than Father Bringas had
gathered around him a circle of eager persons who believed that Spain
could reconquer Mexico. They considered Bringas a saint, in the words of
one, "the Saint Francis Xavier of this century."
In New Orleans and later in Havana Fray Diego
preached and plotted for the cause, the return of wayward Mexico to her
rightful sovereign. When Isidro Barradas' quixotic invasion force put
out from Havana in 1829, the fervent Diego Bringas accompanied it as
chaplain. Its pathetic defeat on the coast of Tampico all but dashed the
royalists' dream. [53]
Meanwhile, in conformity with the national act, the
Estado de Occidente enacted its version of the law expelling Spaniards,
but rumor traveled faster. Excited crowds gathered in the towns of
northern Sonora and demanded action of one sort or another from
officials who had not received copies of national or state law. In
Arizpe the city fathers convened in January, 1828, to draft a patriotic
and uncompromising decree of expulsion for consideration by the state
legislature. As late as March officials of the department of Arizpe,
comprising the districts of Arizpe, Oposura, and Altar, had made no move
to expel the Spanish friars of Pimería Alta. Who would administer
the sacraments when they left? At this juncture the state's military
chief, Comandante de Armas Mariano Paredes Arrillaga, intervened. [54]
Paredes, it seemed, had "reliable reports," one from
the commander at Tubac, that the missionaries were preaching sedition to
the Indians, urging them to resist if anyone should try to expel their
Padres. The natives of Tumacácori and San Xavier were said to be
on the verge of revolt. This was a matter for the military. He acted
accordingly, issuing orders to the commandant of Tucson, Captain Pedro
Villaescusa, son or nephew of the officer who had raised the San Rafael
Company of Pimas forty-five years before. Villaescusa may have
considered his commission unjust or prejudicial, as the friars claimed,
but he complied. Orders were orders. [55]
Sixty-one years earlier Captain Juan Bautista de Anza
reportedly wept when he announced the Jesuit expulsion to Father Visitor
Carlos de Roxas, the old priest who had baptized and married him. Now,
according to a Franciscan account, in 1828 during holy week Captain
Pedro Villaescusa stood outside the convento of San Ignacio, ashamed to
go in, the bearer of similar sad tidings for his friend Fray Juan
Vanó, the Father President. Vanó appeared. He looked
relieved. Finally it was out in the open. He consoled the captain. As a
soldier he must do his duty. All things considered, it was probably for
the best.
The second week in April Captain Villaescusa came to
Tumacácori to expel Fray Ramón Liberós. Paredes'
summary decree gave the Spanish gray-robe only three days to arrange his
affairs and hit the road south. What about the mission's property, the
livestock, stores, and tools, Liberós protested. Frankly,
Villaescusa could not say: the comandante de armas had ordered the
removal of the missionaries, no more no less.
As a tentative measure Father Liberós named
long-time native governor Ramón Pamplona mission administrator
and charged him to pay off the debts still owing for work on the church.
The friar wanted to leave the mission's rightful owners in charge, not
gente de razón. Captain Villaescusa was supposed to explain to
the Indians the reason for the government's action and impress upon them
the punishment for resistance. They must remain calm. [56]
After six trying years at Tumacácori it was
all over for Ramón Liberós. He had been a good steward.
Physically the mission had never looked better. The bell tower, still
embraced by wooden scaffolding, lacked only a few courses of brick and
the dome to be finished. The circular mortuary chapel in the new
cemetery also needed a dome. Given a few more months, he might have
completed the job.
All in all the long-labored Franciscan church,
despite a certain heaviness of proportion, was impressive, outside with
its facade of tiered double columns and painted statue niches, its red
roof-to-ground rainwater ducts and the dappled pattern in the stucco,
the high clerestory windows, and the dome with steps up to the lantern.
Inside, where earth reds, oranges, and pinks predominated, the nave
appeared somewhat cluttered with four side altars protruding from the
walls. Yet when one stood at the back of the church under the choir loft
looking toward the raised sanctuary and main altar, the expanse from
floor to roof vigas seemed very great. The wall designs, floral,
geometric, scrollwork, wrought with straightedge, compass, and stencils,
were plainly European not Indian. East of the church the large enclosed
convento, with granary, kitchen, living quarters, shops, and storerooms,
even in ruin, would give later travelers the impression that the friars
of Tumacácori never lacked for anything.
Before he rode out of Tumacácori for the last
time, he took a fresh sheet of paperlater bound upside-down at the
front of the surviving baptismal, marriage, and burial recordsand
hurriedly composed this note:
Having concluded these books and got out another to
follow, leaving the latter just in case, and having burned the papers of
my personal administration, I am about to set out on my journey.
Fr. R.L.
He did not look back.
By the time Liberós reached San Ignacio,
Father President Vanó had already left. The locals, who had made
Vañó's life so miserable, now crowded around Father
Liberós. They had a favor to ask. They wanted him to officiate at
several weddings. No telling how long they would be without a priest.
Recognizing their plight, the friar dispensed with the banns and on
April 17 and 18 married in the eyes of the Church a half dozen couples.
He united two more couples at Santa Ana, twenty miles farther south. A
week later when Fray Rafael Díaz of San Xavier passed through,
there were more waiting. [57]
Meanwhile to the west an attempt to halt the
expulsion aborted. On Easter Sunday, April 6, Comandante de Armas
Paredes had written to don Juan José Tovar, temporarily in
command at the presidio of Altar, informing him what Captain Villaescusa
was doing and urging him to keep the public peace. On the eighth Tovar
passed the word to the Altar town council.
Next day a troubled Father Faustino González
wrote from Caborca. He had received an order directly from Paredes
telling him to vacate his mission immediately and without excuses. He
could scarcely believe it. He had not preached revolution to his
Indians. "The fact is that during the Yaqui revolt and every crisis I
have endeavored to sustain peace and the present system."
|
Mass at Tumacácori, 1820s. A
diorama at Tumacácori National Monument. Courtesy National
Park Service
|
The Altar council considered the matter. Why was the
military chief judging the missionaries and invoking a law of expulsion
which had not yet been promulgated in Pimería Alta by the civil
authorities? He had plainly violated the federal constitution's
guarantees against trial by mandate and retroactive laws. But what could
they do? Displaying far more gumption than one would expect from a local
politico, Alcalde Santiago Redondo openly challenged the comandante de
armas.
Directing an urgent appeal to the governor of the
Estado de Occidenteat the moment don José María
Gaxiola, political ally of ParedesCitizen Redondo impugned the
comandante's authority to expel the missionaries.
That same day, April 9, the crusading alcalde tried
to stop Captain Villaescusa. Since what his chief had ordered was
plainly the prerogative of the state's governor, Redondo admonished
Villaescusa to suspend the unconstitutional expulsion till the governor
had spoken, or suffer whatever consequences might result. He assured the
captain that calm prevailed in all the pueblos of his district: even if
the Indians of Tumacácori and San Xavier did try to incite a
rebellion, they would find no followers in the west. If on the other
hand, once the law of expulsion was legally promulgated, any Indian
dared take up arms in resistance, that beyond a doubt would be a matter
for the military. [58]
Captain Villaescusa, who did not answer Redondo's
blast until April 22, refused flatly. Obviously his chief feared for the
public safety: he had acted to preserve the peace, entirely within his
authority, even to invoking the already decreed law of expulsion against
the Spanish friars. "I must obey the orders of my chief, in spite of
whatever charges you care to lodge against me. Such charges may well
redound upon you should you continue obstructing the public safety and
compliance with said law. This will serve for your guidance and as an
answer to your communique." [59]
The governor's reply was even tougher. Indeed the
comandante de armas did have the authority to maintain the peace and
enforce laws both federal and local. The reports against the
missionaries of Pimería Alta were precise and documented.
Furthermore, alleged the governor, the friars, fearing that the
expulsion law would be executed, had been busy alienating and destroying
mission property, and the town council of Altar had lifted not a finger
to prevent it. Gaxiola reproached the councilmen severely for their
unpatriotic attitude and sent them a new supply of the law for posting.
[60]
While the ayuntamiento of Altar abased itself before
Governor Gaxiola, the expelled missionaries gathered at the makeshift
hospice in Ures, all but Fray Faustino González. Even though
Captain Villaescusa gave the fifty-six-year-old friar his three days to
prepare for the journey, González had set out "with no more
baggage than a blanket tied to his saddle and with nothing for
sustenance but the breviary in his saddlebags." When he reached the
mining camp of Cieneguilla the people would not let him proceed. They
insisted that they would intercede with the authorities in his behalf.
So he stayed, living on the alms he got for Masses and encouraged by don
Francisco Javier Vázquez, the parish priest who had informed on
Estelric four years earlier. Even though González' respiratory
ailment should have exempted him to begin with, nearly two years passed
before the authorities allowed him to return to Caborca. [61]
The others found themselves detained at Ures during
May 1828 subsisting on charity. Father García wrote to discourage
the children of Cocóspera who wanted to visit him: he simply had
nothing to give them. Most of the friars had resigned themselves to
leaving, but not without a hearing. The charges of sedition against them
they imputed to one of their avaricious neighbors in the Pimería,
"a person ungodly since his earliest years." They knew that their
opponents had trumped up the charges to discredit them, and that they
had welcomed the law of expulsion as a means of removing them. Since the
beginning there had been persons who coveted mission lands and Indian
labor. It now seemed that they had won.
Still, the charge of fomenting revolution galled
them. One of their number, they decided, must travel to Álamos
and appear before the governor to vindicate them, to request passports
for the Puerto de Refugio, and to pick up the sum stipulated by the law
of expulsion for religious and other Spaniards who could not afford the
cost of travel. The job required confidence, persuasiveness, and above
all an ability to deal with the politicos. They chose Ramón
Liberós. [62]
He failed to get the money. But he did apparently
make a favorable impression on Governor Gaxiola. Because of the shortage
of priests in the department of Álamos the friars were welcome to
stay on there. Father President Vanó answered for the majority.
"Seeing himself free now (without having requested it) of the
responsibility that had weighed upon him so heavily, he spoke of nothing
but leaving." Only two stayed, young Mexican-born Fray José
María Pérez Llera and the Spaniard Fray Rafael Díaz
who had friends in Arizpe.
Pérez Llera intended to leave with his
brothers. He was scared. If the government had banished Spaniards he
feared that it might soon move against religious born in Mexico. The
college of Querétaro would likely cease to exist as a separate
entity, either stranding him or forcing him to join the Jalisco
province. So he had asked for his passport. But when he began to feel
"somewhat worse than usual," he had second thoughts and changed his
mind. As Vanó and the others set out from Ures, the Father
President commissioned Pérez Llera to make a visitation of the
missions, to comfort those poor souls, baptize the newborn, and confess
the sick. [63]
Left alone, he was more scared than ever.
|