Contents
Foreword
Preface
Jesuit Foundations
Gray Robes for Black 1767-68
The Archreformer Backs Down 1768-72
Tumacácori or Troy? 1772-74
The Course of Empire 1774-76
The Promise and Default of the Provincias Internas 1776-81
The Challenge of a Reforming Bishop 1781-95
A Quarrel Among Friars 1795-1808
"Corruption Has Come Among Us" 1808-20
A Trampled Guarantee 1820-28
Hanging On 1828-56
Epilogue
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliography
|

This peaceful and happy state, which the inhabitants
of old Spain looked upon with envy, and which will forever constitute a
political phenomenon difficult to elucidate for our successors, came to
an end after a prolonged period of three hundred years in the fatal
impulse dealt the whole world by the French Revolution.
Intendant-Governor Alejo García Conde,
Arizpe, August 14, 1813
CONCURRENT EVENTS
1808 | John Jacob Astor incorporates
the American Fur Company. |
1809 | Abraham Lincoln born in Hardin,
Kentucky. |
1810 | New Mexico elects Pedro
Bautista Pino as its deputy to the Spanish Cortes, a new
experience.
Zebulon Montgomery Pike publishes his journals, the earliest of an Anglo
in the "Southwest." |
1812 | Napoleon invades
Russia.
The U.S. declares war on Great Britain. |
1813 | Wellington and the Spaniards
drive the French from Spain.
Spaniards recapture San Antonio, Texas, from filibusters. |
1814 | The Society of Jesus is
restored by Pope Pius VII.
The British burn Washington, D.C.
Andrew Jackson beats the Creeks at Horseshoe Bend. |
1817-25 | Building of the Erie
Canal. |
1819 | By the Adams-Onís Treaty
with Spain, the U.S. gains Florida and a favorable western boundary of
the Louisiana Purchase and renounces claims to Texas.
Sir Walter Scott publishes Ivanhoe.
The Republic of Gran Colombia is proclaimed with Simón Bolivar as
president. |
1820 | A liberal revolt in Spain
temporarily reimposes a constitutional monarchy. |
FROM 1808 until the end of Spanish rule in Mexico
world events intruded in Pimería Alta more frequently and with
greater impact than ever before. The frontier missionaries, far from
ignorant of the upheaval set in motion by the French Revolution, kept up
with the news, much as it pained them. Back in 1795 Fray Francisco
Iturralde had reacted emotionally at Tubutama to word that French armies
had invaded Spanish soil: "I believe that the greatest sorrow I have
felt in my life was upon receiving news of the misfortunes heaped upon
my country by the French!" [1]
Reaping the consequences of years of intrigue,
compromise, and incompetence, Spain's ruling classes found themselves by
1808 unwilling hosts to a hundred thousand French troops, bereft of
their monarchs Charles IV and Ferdinand VII, and faced with the
imposition of Napoleon's brother Joseph as king.
In New Spain the shocking chain of events aroused
conflicting sentiments. To many of the criollos, the American-born
Spaniards profoundly resentful of their peninsular "betters," here
finally was the chance to cast out Spanish governors, Spanish army
officers, and Spanish bishops. Since the Bourbon monarchy had toppled,
they owed no allegiance to Spain, now a mere province of France. They
favored, with varying intensity and commitment, an independent Mexico.
Opposing them stood the powerful peninsulares who still ruled in
government, army, and church. As Spanish patriots and royalists, to whom
authority from anywhere but Spain was unthinkable, they looked to the
resistance government and to restoration of the rightful king Ferdinand.
With Commandant General Salcedo, they swore to give up their lives
rather than submit to French domination.
In May, 1809, the same month the friars of
Pimería Alta dedicated the glorious new church at Caborca,
another "solemn and joyous" ceremony took place in the capital of
Arizpe. At 8:00 A.M. on the 28th an official party gathered in the main
salon of the intendant-governor's residence to witness don Alejo
García Conde swear allegiance to the Suprema Junta
Centralthe resistance government in Spainand to Ferdinand
VII, their king in exile. Afterward in his oration don Alejo urged on
everyone a singular austerity for the duration. All must sacrifice. All
must demonstrate their patriotism by contributing to the monies being
collected for the war effort. Bells pealed, a triple volley of musketry
was fired, and all joined in vivas to junta and king. A solemn Mass with
Te Deum consummated the event.
Five hundred and fifty miles farther south in
Culiacán, where he had finally fixed the see of his diocese, Fray
Francisco Rouset de Jesús, fourth bishop of Sonora, insisted on
calm while echoing the intendant-governor's plea for contributions to
drive the godless French invader from Spanish soil. The friars too would
be expected to contribute. How under these circumstances was Narciso
Gutiérrez ever to finish his church? [2]
The Suprema Junta Central, fleeing before the French
to Isla de León on the bay of Cádiz, yielded to a five-man
regency which in desperation summoned the long-defunct Spanish
parliament, the Cortes. With all due pomp and demonstration in Arizpe,
García Conde acknowledged the regency and arranged for the
election of a delegate from Sonora. That honor fell in the summer of
1810 to Licenciado don Manuel María Moreno, who as Bishop
Rouset's deputy thirteen years before had come to Tumacácori on
an official visitation later declared illegal. [3] But on September 16, 1810a day that
lives on in Mexicobefore don Manuel María could book
passage for Spain, all hell broke loose.
From the time Napoleon upset the Spanish monarchy,
criollo and peninsular had been jockeying for power. The intrigue in
Mexico City, where two viceroys rose and fell by coup in rapid
succession, was reflected in the provinces. A whole network of criollo
cabals worked for independence. On the night of September 13 local
authorities in Querétaro sought to break the back of one such
group. Warned at the last minute, the leaders eluded capture and came
together at the town of Dolores, sixty miles northwest. There in the
early morning hours of September 16 the visionary parish priest Miguel
Hidalgo y Costilla raised the grito de Dolores. Inflamed by his
rhetoric, the Indians and mestizos of his parish chanted the new
slogans: Viva la Independencia! Viva la Virgen de Guadalupe! But what
they really took to heart was Death to the Spaniards!
From the first confused and conflicting reports that
reached them in their frontier missions, the friars of Pimería
Alta feared that their college would be overrun by the rabble, their
brethren butchered, and the building ransacked. All that happened and
worse, but not in Querétaro. The insurgent band, grown into a
great multitude of frenzied rural and urban downtrodden, armed with
anything that would kill, had flowed west out of control. Taking
Guanajuato, they slaughtered like hogs in a pen the hundreds of
peninsulares, men, women, and children, who cowered with their
possessions inside the public granary.
For months rebel hordes hacked bloody paths across
Mexico as their leaders vainly sought to harness their pent-up urge to
kill. With the capital seemingly within his grasp a disillusioned
Hidalgo steered his following west to Guadalajara. The ill-organized
government put General Félix Calleja into the field. When he
gained the upper hand, his carnage in retaliation matched the
insurgents'.
A year after the first grito Fray Ángel Alonso
de Prado, guardian of the Querétaro college, detailed for the
Franciscan commissary general in Spain the friars' glorious actions in
support of God and king. The original plot uncovered in
Querétaro, said Prado, had called for slitting the throats of all
the friars without exception. Sensing the subsequent unrest in the city,
the guardian had sent the entire household, save lay brothers and the
ill, into the streets and plazas to preach the Gospel against the
rebellion, against Freemasonry, against Napoleon and atheism, doctrines
"so clearly false and even ridiculous that they could seduce only fools,
which Hidalgo and his followers were."
Rebel sympathizers, "sowing darnel among the pure
grain of God's word," had spread rumors among the people that the friars
were opposed to the insurrection only because they were Spaniards, only
because they were being paid handsomely for their efforts. The grayrobes
were said to be "heretics, Jews, etc." It seemed incredible to Prado how
the people's warm appreciation of the college for a hundred and thirty
years could change in an instant to voracious hatred. Reluctantly, he
had taken the friars off the streets for their own safety. Thank God he
could proclaim that no member of the college had gone over to the
insurgent party.
Queretaran friars served mainly with royalist forces.
They had helped set up and maintain a troop hospital in
Querétaro. They had inspired the city's defenders during the
rebels' October 30 assault, when mortars lobbed a hundred stones into
the college, into the friars' very cells. As chaplains they had shared
the glory and the hell of battle. New Spain, Prado assured his superior,
recognized the college's singular contribution to the royalist cause,
not only in preventing strategic Querétaro from falling to the
insurgents but also on the field of battle. For all this the friars had
charged nothing.
One Queretaran emerged from the insurrection with a
national reputation. He was Diego Miguel Bringas, born in Mexico but
intensely loyal to Spain and the king. He had been working at the
college's Pames Indian mission of Arnedo, some seventy miles north of
Querétaro, when General Calleja marched through. The zealous,
articulate Bringas joined the Regiment of San Carlos as chaplain. For
more than a year he served with Calleja, sharing all the general's
victories, "preaching, exhorting, and freeing the faithful of so many
errors with indefatigable zeal." He also published patriotic tracts. [4]
As a reward for Bringas' "incalculable" services,
General Calleja, who became viceroy in 1813, secured for the Queretaran
the titles of honorary chaplain and preacher of the king. His fiery
royalist sermons made Father Bringas the viceroyalty's best-known
preacher. When Intendant-Governor García Conde of Sonora
suggested splitting the enormous diocese of Sonora in two he could think
of no better candidate for the new see than Diego Miguel Bringas. He
would make, García Conde believed, "a wise and virtuous prelate
of surpassing patriotism." [5]
Not all the friars proclaimed the royalist doctrine
with Bringas' ardor. Still, the missionaries in Pimería Alta
rejoiced at the news that García Conde had routed the rebel force
of José María González de Hermosillo at Piaxtla in
February, 1811. The service records of all who saw action that day,
including hundreds of presidials ordered south to meet the rebel
invasion, henceforth contained a proud description of their deeds. From
the service record of Tubac's pockmarked veteran Sergeant Ambrosio
Sambrano:
He served under my command at the battle of San
Ignacio de Piaxtla, February 8, 1811, at which the insurgent army,
composed of 7,500 men and commanded by the supposed Colonel Hermosillo,
was vanquished and completely destroyed, leaving on the field of battle
about six hundred cadavers, all its artillery, baggage trains,
standards, and military stores. It was completely dispersed, put to
flight, and driven entirely out of the province. [Signed] García
Conde. [6]
What worried the friars was that Sergeant Sambrano
and many other frontier troops remained on duty in the interior for
years, presumably to keep the province safe from insurgents. Later in
1811 they had learned that Hidalgo had been captured and shot.
Everywhere, reported the government press, royalist forces had taken the
offensive and were mopping up the rabble. Mean while the Provincias
Internas suffered. The military dislocation of frontier troops left the
presidios undermanned. The interruption of commerce and agriculture in
central New Spain had resulted in widespread shortages. And who knew
when or where the race war and carnage would erupt again? [7]
While the early, ghastly stages of the war for
Mexican independence ran their courseterrifying everyone of
property, criollo and peninsular alikeand Englishmen joined
Spaniards to battle the French in Spain, liberals from both sides of the
Atlantic sitting in the Cortes at Cádiz had reshaped the empire
in parliamentary debate. Not content merely to lend unified support to
the war effort against Napoleon, as their absolutist king in exile
wished, they proclaimed a limited constitutional monarchy, an elected
parliament, and equality of criollo and peninsular. As the beleaguered
empire fought for its life, the Cortes in Cádiz gave to the world
the Spanish constitution of 1812.
Displaying their well-known tenacity, as well as
exceedingly poor timing, the friars had entered into another round with
the commandant general. At base the issues at odds remained the
samepropagation of the Faith and imperial security. In 1799 Pedro
de Nava had denied Father Bringas' request to found new missions on the
Pimería Alta frontier, largely because they would have sat
exposed beyond the presidial cordon. After that, the friars had bided
their time. Father Llorens had kept ministering to the heathens as best
he could from San Xavier del Bac. By 1805 the college had decided on the
site of its first Pápago mission, Santa Ana de Cuiquiburitac,
less than fifty miles northwest of the presidio of Tucson. Then in 1809,
with the allegedly pro-missionary Suprema Junta Central governing in
Spain, the college tried again. They found Nemesio Salcedo no more
amenable than Nava. [8]
To carry their colors the friars of the college had
chosen stubborn, round-faced Fray Juan Bautista de Cevallos, a
sixty-year-old ex-guardian whom they had recently named comisario
prefecto of missions. The new job gave Cevallos overall supervision
of the Queretaran missions, outranking Father President Moyano in the
field, and charged him to manage mission affairs with the governments of
Sonora and the Provincias Internas. He did not hesitate. Opening with a
petition to Commandant General Salcedo in October, 1809, Cevallos had
asked permission to found a missionary hospice in Sonora and new
missions on the Pimería Alta frontier. Salcedo put the friar off.
He wanted opinions from Bishop Rouset and Intendant-Governor
García Conde.
Confident of favorable replies from bishop and
intendant, Father Cevallos had gone off to Mexico City to raise money.
By early December he was exultant. Already, he reported to Salcedo, he
had enough pious funds for three new missions. If the commandant in his
capacity as vice patron of the church would merely issue the license to
found these missions, and provide the necessary mission guards, the
college could begin at once. That set the commandant general raving. He
had better things to do. Since Napoleon's sale of Louisiana to the
United States, Salcedo had been hard pressed to hold back the
encroaching North Americans. The recent affair of Zebulon Montgomery
Pike was but a single case. This matter of Pápago Indian missions
had gone far enough.
Founding missions beyond the presidial line was
folly. Had Cevallos forgotten what had happened on the Río
Colorado, even with mission guards? Salcedo offered an alternative, a
safer way for the college of Querétaro to expend its Christian
zeal and its patrons' money. Why not join with the short handed college
of Zacatecas to carry the Faith to the poor Tarahumaras and Tepehuanes
deep in the Sierra Madre? That was impossible, Cevallos retorted. The
king had assigned the Sonora frontier to the Querétaro college
and had forbidden one college to work in another's sphere. Besides, the
Pápagos were not dangerous. If the Pápagos were not
dangerous, asked Salcedo late in March, 1810, why bother with mission
guards at all?
At this juncture, the commandant appealed to Bishop
Rouset, himself an ex-member of the college of Zacatecas and an
ex-missionary to the Tarahumaras. [9]
Father Cevallos did not back down. By mid-summer 1810
he had threatened to take the matter over Salcedo's head to the
authorities in Spain. Then, writing from Querétaro on September
17, 1810, the day after Hidalgo's grito de Dolores, the friar accused
the commandant of deliberate delay. The college had raised funds for not
one but a whole series of heathen missions. Salcedo did not have to wait
for the bishop's reply: he had the authority himself to found missions.
When the bishop did reply two days later, he suggested only that another
friar be assigned to San Xavier del Bac to allow Father Llorens time to
further examine possible mission sites in the Papagueria. Salcedo was
delighted. That ought to hold the pesky Franciscan.
When Cevallos' bitter and accusing letter of
September 17, 1810, delayed a year by the insurrection, finally reached
Salcedo the commandant exploded. How dare he? Would these importuning,
impractical friars never learn? They had not solved any of the problems
of a Pápago mission. What about water, he chided. The wells and
tanks suggested by Father Moyano would not only take most of their money
but would also make the government that approved them look bad.
What if the Pápagos decided to throw in with
the insurgents? There had been rumors. Then he would lose minister,
funds, and guard all at once. The commandant trusted that with the extra
friar suggested by the bishop the comisario prefecto's ardor for
converting the Pápagosno less, averred Salcedo, than his
own concern for souls, circumstances permittingwould cool and
leave him free to do his job. "I am convinced that instead of meditating
on petitions to Europe, you ought to get on with it, by assigning
another missionary." [10]
The clamor of the Hidalgo revolt had drowned any
reply from Cevallos. The friar waited. Meanwhile, Father Llorens used
oxen from San Xavier to haul timber and supplies out to Cuiquiburitac
where he and the Pápagos built a chapel, house, and shelters for
the escort that accompanied him. [11] Then
in December, 1812, more than a year after he had fired off what he hoped
was the coup de grace, Salcedo heard again from Cevallos. The testy
grayrobe was headed for Chihuahua.
With five missionaries and twenty-one mule loads of
supplies for the missions, Father Cevallos had set out from
Querétaro on November 30. Face to face he would discuss with
Salcedo, and with the bishop, new missions and a hospice, then proceed
to a visitation of Pimería Alta. He reached Chihuahua on January
22, 1813. Nothing had changed. He still threatened to appeal to Spain.
He even went so far as to suggest that he himself would, with Salcedo's
approval, recruit volunteers from among retired soldiers as a guard for
the first mission. Then Fray Juan Bautista de Cevallos, O.F.M., "Father
of the Provinces of Michoacán and Jalisco and of the College of
San Fernando de México, Commissary of the Holy Tribunal of the
Inquisition, ex-Lector, ex-Guardian, and present Commissary Prefect of
the missions of the College of la Santa Cruz de Querétaro," drew
himself up to his full height and all but dared the commandant general
to deny him. Salcedo did.
Not only did the commandant challenge the friar's
credentials as comisario prefecto, but he questioned the legality of any
innovation whatever in the missions. Were not the friars themselves now
resurrecting, at least in part, the very custodies Father Barbastro had
labored so ceaselessly to kill? The king's cedulas abrogating the
custody of San Carlos had decreed continuance and support of the
missions en la forma anligua. Salcedo was unaware that the royal
will had changed one whit. Therefore he revoked Father Cevallos' pass to
proceed any farther. The friar had been outmaneuvered, for the moment.
He had no alternative. He had to turn back to Querétaro. Both men
appealed to Spain. The friar had a brother at court. [12]
Times were bad, at least unsettled, for everyone. The
absolutes of the past seemed bent on crashing down and the future held
nothing but uncertainty. For the Querétaro college, allied firmly
with Spain's rule in Mexico but estranged from the commandant general,
the best prospect for security lay in fraternal unity and integrity.
There could hardly have been a worse time for dissension and scandal in
the community.
The college had sent a recruiter to Spain in 1796. He
had dallied. Wars, blockades, and bureaucratic inefficiency hampered his
efforts. Not till 1803 did he dispatch the first fifteen friars. Eleven
more had followed in 1805. Several of them were soon at work in
Pimería Alta without fanfare. The next mission was something
else. As Cevallos confided to Father Bringas, "Friend, these new
gachupines. . . come with the very latest ideas in religious
devotion." [13]
Enlisted during the trying three years between 1810
and 1813 when French armies occupied much of the peninsula, the friars
of this most recent mission had sailed piecemeal on six different ships.
Their colectador, Fray Francisco Núñez, did not depart
Cádiz with the last half-dozen until July, 1813. Of the
thirty-seven recruits he managed to embark, fully half proved utterly
unsuitable. [14]
In the winter of 1812-1813 five of the new arrivals
had ridden north in the train of Father Cevallos. At Durángo he
sent three ahead to Culiacán with a letter for Bishop Rouset. The
other two he took with him to Chihuahua to meet Commandant General
Salcedo. Although Salcedo forced the unrelenting Cevallos to go back the
way he had come, he let the five missionaries pass. By early June, 1813,
under the eye of the old guard, they had taken up their ministry, Miguel
Montes at Tubutama, Matías Creo at Oquitoa, Pedro Ruiz at San
Ignacio, Francisco Fontbona at Cocóspera, and Francisco
Pérez at Tumacácori as compañero to Narciso
Gutiérrez. Only Miguel Montes lasted. [15]
Fray Pedro Ruiz, a chronic complainer, had begged the
viceroy from Mexico City, even before he had seen the college, to let
him go back to Spain where he could be more suitably employed "or
defending with the sword our beloved religion as I had done before for a
year and a half." Father Núñez, he claimed, had
misrepresented the situation in New Spain. "He told me that I did not
know the character of this people, that they very much wanted us, and
even should the insurgents prevail the convents would remain in
existence. He told me that by the time we arrived here this would have
quieted down. What has happened is just the opposite." Besides, his
stomach ached. [16]
At Tumacácori the thirty-year-old Francisco
Pérez decided he would rather be a presidial chaplain than a
missionary to Indians. Born in the villa of Rubielos de Mora a long day
east and south of Teruel, he had entered the order on November 23, 1800,
and sailed for America September 6, 1811. Pérez and his fellow
Aragónes Pedro Ruiz had given Father Cevallos a hard time on the
road north from Querétaro with their little attention to the
daily offices. When the superior threatened to send them back to the
college they humbled themselves half-heartedly. He decided right then,
as much to get rid of them as to use their services, that they and
Matías Creó should carry the letter to Culiacán for
the bishop. [17]
Fathers Gutiérrez and Pérez did not see
eye to eye, which may not have been all Pérez' fault. The older,
entrenched Gutiérrez had been painfully afflicted by what sounded
like a severe case of the shingles. "For two years now," Father
President Moyano wrote in September, 1813, "Father Narciso has suffered
from sores over almost all his body. Some clear up and others follow,
and thus afflicted he continues coming and going without ceasing his
ministry but not fully cured of them even though he has tried various
remedies." That cannot have brightened his disposition. Evidently
Gutiérrez turned over to his irreverent new compañero the
spiritual care of Tubac. That proved a mistake. [18]
Meanwhile back at the college, the headstrong Father
Cevallos savored the news that Nemesio Salcedo had retired. No one would
stop him now from performing his duties as comisario prefecto of
missions. Another of the periodic reorganizations had split the
Provincias Internas into eastern and western divisions. In November,
1813, Cevallos applied to the elderly don Bernardo de Bonavia y Zapata,
commandant general of the west with headquarters in Durango, for
permission to carry out his delayed visitation. Bonavia consented, and
by the following spring the indomitable old Franciscan was in
Sonora.
After a visit to Arizpe he decided that his pet
project, the missionary hospice, should be located not there in the
capital but in Ures. Soon Commandant General Bonavia began getting
petitions from interested citizen groups. He had given this friar a
license to conduct a visitation, not run around soliciting support for a
hospice. That matter would be decided in Spain. Annoyed, Bonavia
dictated a letter to the acting governor of Sonora. "If these petitions
persist, interrupting the important affairs of this office, I shall find
it necessary to order Father Cevallos' return to his convent whether or
not he has concluded his visitation." [19]
On the matter of missions for the heathens the new
commandant general blew hot and cold. "It is not possible at present,"
he had written in January, 1814, "to provide the aid requested for
founding the missions proposed on the Gila River and at the place called
Santa Ana." Still, he wanted to know what preliminary measures might be
taken to insure a fruitful reception of Christianity among these
Indians. He pondered technical assistance, settlers joining with the
heathens in farming and ranching operations thereby starting them along
the road to civilization. [20]
A crisis had developed at San Xavier del Bac where
Father Llorens had been working with and encouraging the heathens for
more than twenty years. Some of them, evidently provoked by gente de
razón from Tucson, had rebelled. Utterly dejected, Llorens was
asking for his superiors' permission to join the province of
Jalisco.
For although it has been partly smothered by
punishment and imprisonment of the principal instigators meted out by
the new commandant, Lieutenant Colonel don Manuel Ignacio de Arvizu,
still resentment smolders. I see it in them at every turn, fed by the
continuous tormenting of Father Arriquibar and his agents. Thus I know
that it is impossible for me to stay on in peace at this mission of San
Xavier and its visita of Tucson. [21]
At the same time Indian delegations from the Gila
trooped all the way south to Arizpe to demonstrate before provincial
authorities their desire for missions. A Cocomaricopa chief with
nineteen of his tribesmen showed up toward the end of January
representing four pueblos. In late March a large Gila Pima embassy
stopped by the presidio of Tucson for a pass to the capital. These
Indians admitted that the drying up of the river in 1813 and resultant
crop failurein which they claimed to see the hand of Godhad
motivated them. When word of these heathen demonstrations reached
Commandant General Bonavia in Durango, he asked for an informed opinion.
[22]
Captain Antonio Narbona, seasoned commander of
Fronteras, hero of the great Spanish victory over the Navajos in 1805,
and temporarily directing operations from Tucson against the Apaches,
had no use for the Cocomaricopas. They and the faithless Yumas were one
and the same; they had tried to kill the people he had licensed to trade
with them; they could not be trusted.
|
Cocomaricopa village. From
Bartlett, Personal Narrative, II
|
The Gila Pimas, who had not ceased their pleading for
baptism, were different, said Narbona. They deserved missions. But they
would also have to have a presidio, to ward off nearby Tonto and
Pinaleño Apaches. Captain Narbona knew how this could be provided
without additional expense. The settlers at Tubac and along the middle
Santa Cruz, together with the Indians of Tumacácori, could defend
themselves. The Pima company of Tubac, now under the acting command of
Ensign Juan Bautista Romero, could thus be moved to the Gila. [23] Again Father Garcés would have
smiled.
The Spanish constitution of 1812 and the visitation
of Fray Juan Bautista de Cevallos converged in Pimería Alta in
1814 to the extreme discomfort of Narciso Gutiérrez and most of
his fellows. If Cevallos was not, like Reyes, a reformer at heart, he
had at least resolved to go along with the new constitutional regime. In
the missions, that meant the election of alcaldes nacionales; the
payment of wages to any Indian for any job from herder to catechist not
done for his own sustenance; and the allotment of farm land, first to
mission Indians, next to the recently converted, and last to
settlers.
All this had the ring of the 1767 Croix-Gálvez
instructions to the missionaries. The issue had not changed: it was
still a question of how much authority the missionary should exercise
over his Indians. The traditionalists argued in favor of absolute
paternalism, for the poor Indians' own good. The reformers called it
despotism. In the opinion of most of the friars in the field, Cevallos
had gone over to the side of the misguided liberals.
Arriving on May 14, 1814, at Cocóspera, the
Father Commissary Prefect was pleased to find that Fray Francisco
Fontbona had already complied with the new regulations. Moreover, the
mission appeared prosperous, both physically and spiritually. Fontbona
had served Cevallos as secretary in 1813 on the road from
Querétaro to Chihuahua. The superior admired the young catalan's
precision and his willingness to obey the new law. Again he recruited
Father Francisco as his secretary. Later Fontbona would claim that
because he had assisted Cevallos during the visitation, he had incurred
the undying hatred of many of his brethren, from Father President Moyano
on down. [24]
When Cevallos and Fontbona dismounted at
Tumacácori in late June they had already inspected six of the
missions. They had tried to explain to the Indians what the constitution
of 1812 meant to them, and they had counseled unwilling friars to obey
the law. Though there had been grumbling, Father Cevallos felt confident
that he was firmly instituting the new order. Like Father Visitor
Bringas twenty years before, Cevallos took a dislike to Narciso
Gutiérrez. He had heard rumors about the long-time
Tumacácori missionary's un-Franciscan commercial activities and
temporal irregularities. If a suitable replacement could be found, he
recommended the removal of Father Narciso. [25]
On paper the 147 Indians and mixed-breeds of
Tumacácori were per capita the richest mission residents in all
Pimería Alta, though according to Cevallos they lived in poverty.
He noted that Tumacácori possessed 5,000 cattle, 2,700 sheep and
goats, 750 horses and mules, and 5,654 pesos, surely what was owed the
mission, not cash on hand. Only San Xavier del Bac, with the visita of
Tucson and a combined population of 578, had more cattle (8,797) and
more money (6,293 pesos). The Father Prefect did not comment on
Tumacácori's unfinished church. [26]
|
Cocóspera. From Browne,
Adventures
|
Before Cevallos rode on to San Xavier, last of the
missions, he had a long talk with Fray Francisco Pérez. The young
compañero charged by Gutiérrez to look after the presidio
had done more than that. He had got in a fight with Tubac's alcalde
nacional "from which arose many scandals." The aggrieved official had
twice appealed to the Father Prefect to punish the wild friar,
threatening that if he did not receive satisfaction he would have
recourse to the government. "Seeing no other way to quash the scandals
that had occurred already and avoid other worse ones that threatened,"
Cevallos wrote to Father Guardian Bringas, "I persuaded Father
Pérez to ask me for a license to return to the college." That
satisfied the alcalde, and on June 28 Francisco Pérez left
Tumacácori. [27]
But the independent friar had other ideas. Instead of
taking the shortest route to Querétaro, as he was supposed to, he
traveled around looking for an opening as a presidial chaplain. When
that failed he talked his way into an interim vicariate of an Indian
pueblo in the diocese of Mesquital. Later Cevallos discussed the case
with the commandant general and the episcopal deputy. Both agreed to
suspend Pérez and order him to comply with his superior's dictum.
At that point Pérez dropped from sight. [28]
Hardly had the Father Prefect concluded his
visitation when momentous news arrived from Europe. The French had been
driven from Spain. Napoleon had set Ferdinand VII free. And in May of
1814 the Spanish king had reasserted himself, suspending the
constitution of 1812 and all the laws of the constitutional regime. One
such law awaiting action in Mexico City called for the immediate
secularization of all Indian missions over ten years old "without any
excuse or pretext." Now a bureaucrat simply made the notation:
"Suspended . . . because it is a resolution of the Cortes, pending what
our Sovereign don Fernando VII pleases to resolve in the matter." [29] Most of the missionaries rejoiced and
shouted with the crowd Viva el Rey!
When he looked back on the visitation nearly four
discouraging years later Father Cevallos painted a dismal picture for
the viceroy. In all the Pimería he had found only two friars with
any understanding of the Indians' language. This sad lack might have
been mitigated by teaching the Indians Spanish, but there was in the
missions not a single elementary teacher. And because the missionaries
did not exercise proper supervision over the madores, or Indian
catechists, much of what these helpers taught was utter gibberish. It
would be good, thought Cevallos, to settle gente de razón of
solid character in the missions, but some friars would not concede them
the means to make a living.
In these missions, over a century old, he had found
natives ignorant of Christian doctrine and Spanish but well schooled in
"superstitions of heathendom." Every one of the missions, Cevallos
alleged, could afford to provide decently for the Indians. Yet he noted
"that the ministers of the richest missions were the most at fault."
Almost everywhere he had seen the Indians poorly housed in adobe hovels
"where men, women, sons, and daughters all slept together." Their diet
and clothing too he judged substandard. [30]
The veteran missionaries concurred. Matters went from
bad to worse after the Cevallos visitation. It had served for no other
purpose, Gutiérrez asserted in the spring of 1815, than "to make
the Indians insolent and give them freedom for drunks and sinful
living." Morale was at a low ebb. "I think there must be few among the
old-timers who want to continue in the missions."
When Father Narciso's license to retire to the
college arrived at Oquitoa, a tired and disconsolate Father President
Moyano hid it so that he would remain at Tumacácori. But
Gutiérrez knew and rode over to inquire. The old superior begged
him to stay on. At San Xavier del Bac, Juan Bautista Llorens still asked
to be released to the Jalisco province. He would stay in Pimería
Alta if the superiors would transfer him to Tumacácori with
Gutiérrez. But the contempt and aversion of his Pápagos at
San Xavier was too much for him to take"from Indians I had brought
with my sweat from the desert to a knowledge of God and supported them
in their needs with more love than if they had been my own children."
[31]
They hated the new permissiveness, the scandalous
abandon of the recent arrivals, and the jokes being told at the
presidios by "the coarse and ignorant." "Corruption has come among us
with this last shipment," wrote Gutiérrez, "the cause that fills
us old ones with grief while the new ones are very cocky."
Father President Moyano was desperate, literally
afraid for his life. During the past Christmas season he had attempted
to correct fraternally his compañero Fray Matías
Creó. Instead of humbly accepting his superior's counsel,
Creó "called him damned, vile, shit, and other things that cause
horror." Seeing murder in the young friar's eye, the Father President
departed for Ati. The whole incredible and sordid affair came to a head
a few days later when the psychotic Creó attacked Moyano at Ati
with a knife before a large crowd. Disarmed and tied up, he continued to
spout blasphemy, even as they hauled him away. The shame of it all made
Father Gutiérrez want to sneak away in the night, "for what the
eyes do not see the heart does not lament."
The scandals of 1815 were too sensational to contain
in Pimería Alta. Father Matías Creó filed charges
with the commandant general against the lieutenant who had dragged him
away from Ati. Father Francisco Fontbona denounced don Fernando
Bustamante, commanding officer at Santa Cruz, and as a result the
commandant general removed that officer. In the judicial review that
followed Bustamante's partisans had no trouble dredging up scandal about
Fontbona and his buddy Fray Pedro Ruiz. "In this day," lamented
Gutiérrez "our habit will not escape becoming the broom of the
General Command." [32]
In desperation the superiors at Querétaro
appealed to the controversial trioCreó, Fontbona, and
Ruizto return voluntarily to the college. They refused. When Fray
Ángel Alonso de Prado took over once again as Father Guardian
from Fray Diego Bringas in 1815, he ordered indictments drawn up in
Pimería Alta against the three. He then sent Bringas to Durango
to treat with Commandant General Bonavia. Just as soon as the
indictments reached Father Bringas he was to present them to the
commandant general and beg that the offending friars be exiled to Spain
via the port of Altamira, two hundred and fifty miles north of Veracruz,
and not be allowed to set foot in the college. "They are," wrote Prado,
"arrogant, insubordinate, and in my opinion capable of any offense." [33]
The college asked a friar of the Jalisco province,
Father Fernando Madueño of Cucurpe, to act as judge in preparing
the indictments. In December of 1815 and January of 1816 he heard a
succession of witnesses recount the Creó-Moyano confrontation and
the loose living of Fontbona and Ruiz.
The chaplain of the Altar garrison described how the
latter two Fathers had led a whole crowd of men and women on horseback
out into the countryside on a wild picnic. They drank, sang, and had a
generally gay, goyesque time of it. Fontbona sang the verses of Amor,
Amor "with gesticulations." Don Francisco Redondo, who could not
believe such dissipation in Franciscan Fathers, left in disgust. That
night the revelers went by his house to chide him, "telling him that he
was a Jesuit."
A corporal from Altar testified under oath how
Fontbona loved fandangos, boleras, and brandy. A barrel of aguardiente
did not last him a month! Every one knew of his affair with the woman
Luz Durán alias Sastra, and his notorious drunken brawl with
"el zapatero tapatío." All day Thursday, Friday, and
Saturday of holy week the friar had shut himself up with a few soldiers
and settlers and gambled at cards. The wife of a Santa Cruz corporal
away since the outbreak of the insurrection lived in the Father's house
at Cocóspera. Scandal begat scandal. [34]
None of the accused was apprised of the charges
against him or permitted to testify in his own defense, but they knew
what was going on. Pedro Ruiz fled. Embarking on a China ship at Guaymas
on Christmas Day, 1815, he traveled to Acapulco, from there to
Querétaro, and then let himself be sent back to Spain. Fontbona
and Creó held their ground for more than a year. While the
indictments against them were being considered successively by the
commandant general in Durango, the audiencia in Guadalajara, and the
viceroy in Mexico City, they appealed. "If there are new laws," Fontbona
wrote to the viceroy from Cocóspera, "that condemn men without
hearing them, that convey them to execution without telling them for
what crimes, then my Father Guardian has inflicted them on me to the
letter."
He lashed out at his brothers, his "rivals," "the
dominant group that has plotted against me as a means of revenge." Their
conduct, he alleged, was worse than his. Father Narciso Gutiérrez
of Tumacácori, whom Fontbona wrongly suspected as his accuser,
had earned a reputation "as the friar userer of this province and much
more by his acts of lewdness."
As proof he submitted an unsigned document, allegedly
in the hand of Fray Gregorio Ruiz who had served at Tumacácori
with Gutiérrez and then at Cocóspera. Its author lamented
the excesses of the missionaries. As an example of their blatant
commercialism, he told how on Christmas Day of 1808 the pack train of
Father Gutiérrez had passed through Cocóspera loaded down
with everything from spurs to chilies on the way to trade in
Ópata country. Far from preventing this and other abuses, the
Father President railed at those who dared criticize. One young friar
had been badly mistreated by his seniors for bringing up to Father
Joseph Pérez at San Ignacio the rule against allowing women in
the friars' quarters. Pérez, it seemed, had hired as cook an
extremely beautiful young woman "whose glance alone can prejudice the
virtue of chastity." [35]
Though Fontbona and Creó failed to save
themselves from exile, they did a thorough job of sullying the
reputation of the college. They forced the superiors at Querétaro
to deny their charges. When the viceroy forwarded to the college copies
of Fontbona's slanderous attack, Guardian Prado felt obliged to answer
point by point. As for Father Narciso Gutiérrez, he had taken no
part in the proceedings against Fontbona.
There is no evidence on which to base the charge that
he is guilty of usury or incontinence, for in the repeated visitations
made of the missions nothing against this religious worthy of punishment
has resulted. To the contrary, he has been deserving of praise for
trying to augment the goods of the mission in order to build the temple,
because the old one has greatly deteriorated. [36]
Late in May, 1817, after the homicidal Creó
had threatened the new Commissary Prefect Joseph Pérez with a
knife, he and Fontbona took off under cover of darkness. Arrested at
Guajoquilla south of Chihuahua, they were taken under guard, protesting
and appealing all the way, to Durango and from there to San Luis
Potosí. Finally on January 21, 1818, Viceroy Juan Ruiz de
Apodaca, ordered them sent "with the appropriate security and decorum"
to Altamira for shipment to Spain. The same day he admonished the Father
Guardian of the college at Querétaro to send to Pimería
Alta in the future only the most exemplary, virtuous, and prudent
friars. The case was closed. [37]
At Ures, ex-commissary prefect Juan Bautista de
Cevallos had all but given up. Though the restored Ferdinand VII had
authorized his missionary hospice and the three new missionssince
they were to cost the crown nothingCevallos had no more to show
than an extensive, hollow foundation. His benefactors had closed their
purses. His brethren opposed him, even denounced him to the commandant
general. Narciso Gutiérrez, for one, branded the hospice a
useless extravagance. Santa Ana de Cuiquiburitac had been scrapped as a
mission site allegedly for lack of water. No volunteers could be found
to serve as guards in new missions. They feared a repeat of the Yuma
massacre.
In the spring of 1818 a dejected Cevallos informed
the viceroy that he had turned over all the pertinent documentation to
his successor. He wanted the viceroy to know, in hopes that some
contribution might still be made "to the service of both Majesties, the
welfare of these provinces, the conversion of heathens, and the defense
of the honor of this poor religious, so old and persecuted, who now can
do no more." [38]
Father Cevallos did not give up on the hospicio. In
February, 1826, nine months before the old friar died, an Englishman
visiting Ures noticed a church with a building attached. The only
resident was Cevallos, tall, still erect, his beard and hair white, who
explained that the building was "a Hospicio, or receptacle for aged and
infirm friars" and invited the foreigner in. His guest had no reason to
doubt that the Franciscan was "upwards of ninety" for he "wore upon the
whole a very venerable appearance." They talked about Sonora. The friar
maintained that progress would have been more rapid had the Spanish
government never expelled the Jesuits. Cevallos impressed the visitor as
well educated and extremely understanding of the local people. The
Englishman did not want to take his leave, rather he wished he could
have "spent a day with this living chronicle of olden times." [39]
The monthly post returns from Tubac for 1817 and 1818
belied the government's boast that the insurrection was dead. Of the
Pima infantry company's sixty-three officers and men shown on January 1,
1817, twenty were still on duty in the south:
At Rosario, below Mazatlán in Sinaloa (15):
Sergeant Ambrosio Sambrano
Ensign of Indians Inocencio Soto
Corporal Rafael Arriola
Three carabineers
Nine soldiers
At Arizpe (4):
Sergeant Vicente Irigoyen
Three soldiers
At Bacoachi (1):
Lieutenant and commander of the company don Ignacio
Elías González (next months in Arizpe)
The troops who remained on duty against the
insurgents received, in addition to specific bonuses, double service
time on their records, as per the royal decree of April 20, 1815, "which
was extended for the troops of this province."
The other forty-three members of the garrison were
disposed as follows:
Horse herd (15)
Corporal Bartolo Peña
Fourteen soldiers
Supply train (5):
Corporal José Camargo (next month in the guardhouse)
Sick at the presidio (7):
Seven soldiers
In the guardhouse (6):
Six soldiers
Present for the muster at Tubac (10):
Ensign and acting commander Juan Bautista Romero
Lieutenant of Indians José Rosario
Drummer Reyes Cruz
Seven soldiers
Carried on the rolls in addition were thirteen
inválidos, retired soldiers settled at the presidio and on
call for emergency duty. All of them were present. One soldier, Antonio
Trejo, had deserted on Christmas Eve, 1816. [40]
Lieutenant Ignacio Elías González,
forty-two, born in Chinapa of a prominent Sonora family, was not present
once for muster at Tubac during 1817 or 1818. He spent most of his time
at Arizpe. Named commander of the Pima company on December 20, 1814, at
seven hundred pesos a year, he had served previously as soldier at
Fronteras, cadet at Altar, ensign at Buenavista, and lieutenant at Santa
Fe in New Mexico. Alejo García Conde, who replaced Bonavia as
commandant general late in 1817, evaluated Elías as an officer of
proven valor, sufficient application, sufficient capacity, average
conduct, and married. "He has been a regular officer, but at present he
is being prosecuted in the bankruptcy of the paymaster's office of the
Santa Fe company."
The acting post commander, sixty-three-year-old
Ensign Juan Bautista Romero, had been born at Tubac on San Juan's Day
Eve, June 23, 1754, and baptized a week later by the Jesuit missionary
of Guevavi. His parents, don Nicolás Romero and dona María
Efigenía Perea, owned the Buenavista ranch. Don Juan's entire
military career, forty-two years, had been spent in Hispanic Arizona at
Tubac and Tucson. He retired in August, 1818. Up to the end of 1817 he
had taken part in twenty-eight campaigns, twenty-five forays, and the
defense of Tucson against "the principal attacks" of the Apaches.
García Conde rated his qualities: valor, known; application,
little; capacity, scant; conduct, good; marital status, widowerin
sum, "regular in his class." [41]
José Rosario and Inocencio Soto, addressed as
don in the manner of gentlemen and officers, were classified as
oficiales de naturales. As such they enjoyed a certain social
mobility. On February 2, 1818, Fray Narciso Gutiérrez married don
José, "Lieutenant of the Pima nation," to doña Manuela
Sotelo, daughter of the deceased don Ignacio Sotelo, evidently a
"Spaniard." Soto, an Ópata, had enlisted at Tubac twenty-four
years before, in 1793, when he was described as 5' 3", with "black hair,
broad forehead, and Roman nose, pock-marked, swarthy, and beardless."
[42]
|
Brand registration for Ignacio Pacheco
of Tubac. Courtesy Arizona Historical Society
|
In January, 1817, Ensign Romero enlisted a
Tumacácori Indian. The entry in the Pima company's register was
standard:
Pablo Espinosa, son of Bautista and of Atanasia
López, native of Tumacácori, of the Pima tribe, and
resident at this presidio in the province of Sonora, by occupation a
farmer. His height 5 feet 2 inches, his age nineteen. S.R.C.A.R. [Su
Religión Católica, Apostólica, Romana]. His
features: black hair and eyebrows, brown eyes, sharp nose, aquiline
face, beardless, pock-marked.
He enlisted for ten years in this company of Pimas of
Tubac on January 19, 1817. The penalties provided in the Regulations
were read to him. Because he does not know how to sign he made the mark
of the cross. He was advised that it is legal proof, and that no excuse
whatever will avail him. Witnesses were Lieutenant of Natives don
José Rosario and soldier Miguel Miranda, both of the same
company.
Romero then certified that the Indian had signed up
voluntarily with full knowledge of the penalties for desertion and
surrender. [43]
Another native of Tumacácori, Juan Antonio
Crespo, dark-skinned, beardless, with black hair, black eyes, a broad
nose, and a scar over his left eyebrow, was able to enlist in the
better-paying cavalry company at Tucson in May, 1819, probably because
he was by then thoroughly hispanicized. His mother, María
Gertrudis Brixio, had been listed as either a Yaqui or an Ópata;
his father, Juan Antonio senior, as a Pima, killed outside the walls of
Tumacácori in June, 1801, a manos de los Apaches. [44]
Father Joseph Pérez, Cevallos' successor as
comisario prefecto, was an unrelenting pessimist. Surrounded by
ignorance, sickness, and want, he saw little hope for progress,
spiritual or material, in Pimería Alta. Writing from San Ignacio
in 1817, one hundred and thirty years after the Jesuit Eusebio Francisco
Kino first spoke of the Christian God in that place, Pérez
lamented the Indians' failure to accept Him:
With regard to Christianity, only God looks into the
heart, but from outward effects I am of the opinion that only those who
die before the use of reason are safe, and they are many. The grownups
are full of superstitions, and no matter how the ministers work they do
not believe them because they have more faith in their old medicine
men.
Often one catches them in the gatherings they hold in
the caves of the hills, burns the implements of their superstitions,
breaks their ollas, preaches to them, punishes thembut one
observes no change for the better. It is a peculiar thing that those who
make the greatest false show of Christianity prove the most wed to their
abuses. Great is their effort to hide these transgressions. Even when
they are caught at them they do not want to confess their evil belief,
saying only that the Spaniards have their way of curing and the Indians
theirs, as they learned it from their ancestors. [45]
When heathens came into the missions to be
catechized, said Pérez, hardly did they receive baptism before
they got sick, their women went barren, or their children died. In one
of his pueblos, he asserted, not a single child reached maturity in
eleven years! In August of 1816 a terrible peste epidemia had
ravaged the missions. He and two other priests worked ceaselessly
administering the sacraments in the pueblos of San Ignacio until they
themselves fell ill. The epidemic spread north slowly. Not till
mid-October were its fatal effects felt at Tumacácori. Then in
the next two months Narciso Gutiérrez entered twenty-five names
in the mission book of burials, fifteen of them children's. [46]
The college had sent not a habit in four years. "We
are dressed," wrote Pérez, "in poor coarse cloth and wrapped in
blankets." The government had ceased paying the annual mission stipend
three years before. At the same time the troops demanded provisions,
cattle, and horses. "They make forced loans from us continually." At
least the mission sacristies were well supplied and the churches decent
"except for Tumacácori's which years ago was begun of stone and
brick. Construction is halted perhaps because of the ill effect of the
insurrection." [47]
The next year, 1818, Tumacácori produced only
150 fanegas of wheat, none of maize, 40 of beans, and 2 of garbanzos.
The population stood at 105 Indians and 35 Spaniards and half-breeds.
Bread then was scarce. Twenty years earlier, when the total mission
population numbered just over one hundred, 200 fanegas of wheat was
considered minimal. Meat remained plentiful. Tumacácori still had
an estimated 5,000 head of cattle, 2,500 sheep, 600 horses, 89 mules,
and 15 donkeys, making it overall the richest of the missions in stock.
But there was no market. "Because of this and the lack of water," Father
Pérez explained in his annual report for 1818, "the stock has
left the environs and limits of the missions: to round it up is
expensive and the products do not cover the cost."
All over the Provincias Internas during the
insurrection years people suffered in the economic crisis. Specie went
out of circulation. In Pimería Alta clothes and goods served as
money. The sales tax imposed throughout the Provincias Internas, and for
the first time applied to mission Indians, added to the woes of the
poor. Mission industry foundered for want of cash to pay skilled labor
and buy tools. Even the gifts customarily given to the heathens had been
discontinued. Little wonder work on Father Narciso's church had stalled.
[48]
Nor did politics or Indian relations give cause for
optimism. At the provincial level the government seemed helpless to
cope. Some criollos spoke openly of Mexican independence. They were
heartened by news that a handful of seaborne Argentine insurgents had
captured the capital of Alta California late in 1818. The government
worried that communications from Guaymas in Sonora across the Gulf of
California to Loreto would be severed. When a detachment of Ópata
auxiliaries was ordered to embark at Guaymas as an escort for the mail
the Indians refused and were arrested. In protest their brothers at the
presidio of Bavispe mutinied and held the post for more than a week.
A courier passed through Tumacácori in
February, 1819, carrying word that the Apache warrior Chilitipagé
and ninety-two of his band had presented themselves at the presidio of
Tucson and asked for peace. Two months later Father Narciso buried in
the Tumacácori cemetery forty-year-old José Miguel Borboa,
killed by Apaches. [49]
From the time Narciso Gutiérrez buried his
predecessor in 1795during the troubled reign of Carlos IV and the
second administration of George Washingtonuntil he took to his bed
for the last time in November of 1820the year of the liberal
revolt in Spain and the Missouri Compromise in the United
StatesTumacácori's most enduring friar, his temporary
replacements, and his companeros recorded in the mission books some 255
baptisms, the same number of burials, and 97 marriages. [50] Long since devoid of the human pathos that
surrounded these events, the bare facts still serve.
For the first time in half a century a
Tumacácori missionary ended his tenure having baptized as many
persons as he buried. Father Narciso neither lowered the mortality rate
nor attracted appreciably more heathens. His even ratio resulted from an
influx of population, mainly non-Indian or at least non-Pima and
Pápago.
Gente de razón entered the valley in
increasing numbers during the first two decades of the nineteenth
century, not at a constant rate but when conditions dictated. Some
settled at the mission in preference to Tubac, which also grew during
these years. No matter how poor, they wanted servants, and
Gutiérrez baptized for this purpose more Apaches and Yumas than
ever before. Yaquis, fleeing oppression in their pueblos to the south,
also came to work for the mission and the settlers. Just before he died
in 1820, Gutiérrez listed Tumacácori's population at 121
Indians and 75 Spaniards and persons of mixed blood. [51]
After Father Narciso had secured the mission lands by
title in 1807 he encouraged settlement. By 1808 several gente de
razón families had reoccupied Calabazas, which Gutiérrez
called thereafter the mission rancho. Evidently they did some
restoration, for on May 5, 1818, the friar celebrated a marriage in the
Calabazas church. Farther south at Guevavi a sizable mining operation,
employing Yaqui labor, had commenced in 1814. From the number of
baptisms, marriages, and burials he performed for "Yaquis de Guevavi,"
there must have been dozens of them. There had been gold mining there
sixty-five years earlier, and there would be thirty-five years later.
[52] Doubtless Father Narciso saw that the
mission got a share of the yield.
Of the 255 persons whose burials he entered in the
mission book, 65 were infants under age two, 50 were children two to
fifteen, and 140 were adults from sixteen to "one hundred or more." That
ratio had changed little. Three of the four persons Father Narciso
claimed were centenarians, the censuses rejuvenated by thirty to forty
years. When his entries are compared with those of other friars who
served at Tumacácori, it appears that Narciso Gutiérrez
was unusually reluctant to administer viaticum, or final communion, to
dying Indians. Either they did not summon him in time, or they were
choking or vomiting. Some friars more than others plainly doubted the
Indians' capacity.
Narciso Gutiérrez talked of going home to
Spain, even of making a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, but he never did. [53] He had endured more than double the
compulsory ten years. Still he chose not to use his license for the
college. In deference to Father President Moyano, who never really
recovered from his ordeals with the new liberal generation,
Gutiérrez did not abandon the Pimería. The older men were
dying off. Juan Bautista Llorens, who looked back at glorious San Xavier
del Bac with a broken heart, had died on the road at the presidio of
Santa Cruz in 1815. Little over a year later Narciso Gutiérrez
buried Fray Gregorio Ruiz, Llorens' successor at San Xavier. In 1817
word came from the college that former Father President Francisco
Iturralde had expired on Easter eve, three days short of his
seventy-fourth birthday. Moyano himself followed nine months later.
When Gutiérrez' time came, Wednesday, December
13, 1820, the blue-eyed friar with the long nose died alone and
unprepared, without the holy sacraments. He was not ancient, only
fifty-five, twenty years younger than Pedro Arriquibar, whom he survived
by less than three months.
They carried the body of Narciso Gutiérrez in
a wooden box past the open walls of the temple he had begun nearly two
decades before and into the narrow little adobe the Jesuits had built
before he was born. On Friday morning they put the box into a hole dug
"beneath the steps of the main altar on the Epistle side." They did not
even record the burial. Father Narciso's successor could take care of
that. [54]
Narciso Gutiérrez was spared the trauma of
Mexican independence, but just barely. On his deathbed he could recall
the bishop of Sonora's admonition to his clergy: Jesus Christ had
taught, and the holy scriptures reiterated over and over, the obedience
owed to a legitimate sovereign. And Ferdinand VII was legitimate
sovereign of all the Americas. Gutiérrez knew that
Intendant-Governor Antonio Cordero had taken personal command of
government forces at Rosario in southern Sinaloa, and that by late 1820
he had finally harried the insurgents out of the rugged green mountains
and barrancas in the area. [55]
But the Spanish friar also knew before he died that
Ferdinand VII was in serious trouble at home. A liberal revolt had
forced him to restore the constitution. He was practically a prisoner in
his own palace, with atheists and Freemasons dictating policy through a
radical Cortes. Dutifully, the bishop and the intendant-governor of
Sonora had obeyed the royal instructions requiring an oath to the
constitution, knowing full well that they did not reflect the royal
will.
One of Gutiérrez' last acts was to sign in a
wobbly hand the episcopal circular proclaiming anew the Spanish
constitution. He did not live to see the result. [56]
|