NPSHistory.com

Copyright, RD Payne
INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL PARK, Indiana


National Park Service History Electronic Library & Archive

The NPS History Electronic Library & Archive is a portal to electronic publications covering the history of the National Park Service (NPS) and the cultural and natural history of the national parks, monuments, and historic sites of the (U.S.) National Park System. Also included are documents for national monuments managed by other federal agencies, along with a collection of U.S. Forest Service publications.

The information contained in this Website is historical in scope and is not meant as an aid for travel planning; please refer to the official NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Website for current/additional information. While we are an independent endeavor and not affiliated with the National Park Service, we gratefully acknowledge the contributions by park employees and advocates, which has enabled us to create this free digital repository.


view PARK ARCHIVES


New eLibrary Additions
Featured Publications
book cover
cover only

Walking With Wildfire
Exploring Impacts of the Dixie Fire in Lassen Volcanic National Park
(Tracy Salcedo, 2025)

Auto Tourguide to the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (Douglas B. Evans, 1971; ©Southwest Parks & Monuments Association)

Indians of the Lake Mead Country (James C. Maxon, 1971; ©Southwest Parks & Monuments Association)

Of Men and Volcanoes: The Sinagua of Northern Arizona (Albert H. Schroeder, 1977; ©Southwest Parks & Monuments Association)

Survey and Excavations on Cummings Mesa, Arizona and Utah, 1960-1961 Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin No. 39/Glen Canyon Series No. 5 (J. Richard Ambler, Alexander J. Lindsay, Jr. and Mary Anne Stein, 1964)

Cultural Landscape Report, Part 1: Pullman National Historical Park Site History, Existing Condition, and Analysis (Quinn Evans, August 2026)

Chief Charley's Village: Eyewitness Accounts from a Han Athabascan Settlement on the Yukon River, 1874-1914 Eyewitness Series No. 11 (Chris Allan, 2026)

Report of Reconnaissance of Santa Fe Trail in Kansas and Colorado (Ray H. Mattison, January 1958)

Interdisciplinary Investigations of the Boott Mills, Lowell, Massachusetts. Volume III: The Boarding House System as a Way of Life Cultural Resources Management Study No. 21 (Mary Carolyn Beaudry and Stephen A Mrozowski, 1989)

The Watchman Site (42WS126), Zion National Park, Utah (Kerry Varley, December 2002)

A Manual for Instructors in Civilian Conservation Corps Camps (1935)

Inventory of Wildlife-Associated Nests, Burrows, Refuges, and Cavities — San Juan National Historic Site (SJNHS): Pre-Implementation Monitoring Assessment 2026 (Miguel A. Naveira Guzman, March 2026)

Inventario de nidos, madrigueras, refugios y cavidades relacionados con la Vida Silvestre — Sitio Histórico Nacional de San Juan (SJNHS): Evaluación de seguimiento preliminar a la implementación 2026 (Miguel A. Naveira Guzman, March 2026)

Mississippi River Companion (2014)

Essays on Modern Architecture For the National Historic Landmark Program (Sarah Allaback, April 2, 2003)


Discovering Cone-Bearing Trees of Sequoia and Kings Canyon (Wayne B. Alcorn, 1958)

The Cone-Bearing Trees of Yosemite National Park (James E. Cole, Yosemite Nature Notes Special Number, Vol. XVIII No. 5, May 1939)

Broadleaved Trees of Yosemite National Park (C. Frank Brockman, Yosemite Nature Notes Special Issue, Vol. XXVI No. 1, January 1947)

Guide to the Mariposa Grove Nature Trail (Richard Wason, Yosemite Nature Notes, Vol. 37 No. 3, March 1958)

Climate and Water Monitoring at Carlsbad Caverns National Park: Water Year 2024 NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/484 (Kristina Fahey, Kara Raymond and Tani Hubbard, August 2026)

Climate and Water Monitoring at Amistand National Recreation Area: Water Year 2024 NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/485 (Kara Raymond, Susan Singley and Tani Hubbard, August 2026)

Climate and Water Monitoring at Big Bend National Park: Water Year 2024 NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/486 (Susan Singley, Kara Raymond and Tani Hubbard, August 2026)

Reptiles in the North Rim of Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/487 (Charles T. Hanifin and Kristopher B. Pedersen, August 2026)

Unveiling a legacy of fish introductions to mountain lakes using historical records and eDNA surveys in a National Park (Samuel J. Brenkman, Jeffrey J. Duda, Rebecca M. McCaffery, Katie E. Kierczynski, Marshal S. Hoy, Trevor J. Kumec, William Baccus, Caren S. Goldberg, Carl O. Ostberg and Steven C. Fradkin, extract from Frontiers in Conservation Science, Vol. 6, January 2026)

Carrying Capacity and Adaptive Visitor Use Management for Sustainable Parks and Protected Recreation Areas: A Critical Narrative Review (Gulnihal Sakrak Ekin, Yakin Ekin, Onur Akbulut and Tunahan Celik, extract from Sustainability, Vol. 18, 2026)

Long-Term Forest Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Fort Clatsop Unit, Lewis and Clark National Historical Park (Meredith Klinzing, 2026)

Macroinvertebrate Monitoring in the National Capital Region Network: Summary Report 2019-2022 (Robert H. Hilderbrand, August 2026)

Cape Cod National Seashore 2023 Shorebird Monitoring and Management Report NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/499 (Kacey Srubas, August 2026)

Ecology of Moose in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska: A Research Summary, 1980-1996 (V. Van Ballenberghe, 1997)

Postglacial ecosystem development of a hydrothermal landscape in Yellowstone National Park (Cathy Whitlock, Christopher M. Schiller, Steven W. Hostetler, Shaul Hurwitz, Mio Alt, Sabrina R. Brown, Lauren N. Harrison, Jay R. Alder, Kailey Busch, Jake Shelly and David B. McWethy, extract from PNAS, Vol. 123 No. 35, August 17, 2026)

Geologic Map of the Craters of the Moon, Kings Bowl, and Wapi lava fields, and the Great Rift volcanic rift zone, south-central Idaho U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigation Series Map I-1632 (Mel A. Kuntz, Duane E. Champion, Richard H. Lefebvre and Harry R. Covington, 1988)

Observations on the Teton Glacier, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, 1965 and 1966 U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-C (John C. Reed, Jr., 1967)

May 1963 Earthquakes and Deformation in the Koae Fault Zone, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-C (Willie T. Kinoshita, 1967)

Partial Draining and Crustal Subsidence of Alae Lava Lake, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-C (Donald A. Swanson and Donald W. Peterson, 1972)

The Great Sand Dunes of Southern Colorado U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-C (Ross B. Johnson, 1967)

The Underside of River Ice, St. Croix River, Wisconsin U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-C (Kevin L. Carey, 1967)

Chemical Characteristics of Bulk Precipitation in the Mojave Desert Region, California U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-C (J.H. Feth, 1967)

Glaciation Near Lassen Peak, Northern California U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-C (Dwight R. Crandell, 1972)


The Architecture of Pueblo Bonito Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 147 No. 1 (Neil M. Judd, June 30, 1964)

Pueblo del Arroyo, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 138 No. 1 (Neil M. Judd, June 26, 1959)

The Material Culture of Pueblo Bonito Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 124 (Neil M. Judd, December 29, 1954)

Dating Pueblo Bonito and Other Ruins of the Southwest National Geographic Society Pueblo Bonito Series No. 1 (A.E. Douglass, 1935)

The Geology of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico In Relation To The Life And Remains Of The Prehistoric Peoples Of Pueblo Bonito Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Volume 122, Number 7 (Kirk Bryan, February 2, 1954)


Administrative Manual on Employee Interest in Lands and Resources Administered by the Department (July 23, 1962)

Final Environmental Impact Statement: Volume II — Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Arizona-Nevada (July 1986)

Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement and General Management Plan, Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada (July 2000)

Comments and Responses on the 1998 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and General Management Plan, Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada (July 2000)

Abbreviated Final Environmental Impact Statement & General Management Plan, Death Valley National Park, California and Nevada (July 2001)


For The Dean: Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Byron Cummings on His Eighty-Ninth Birthday, September 20, 1950 (Erik K. Reed and Dale S. King, eds., 1950)

Homestead Meadows: A Hike into History (Date Unknown)

The Lava Butte Geological Area (Phil F. Brogan, c1962)

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Newberry Geothermal Pilot Project (January 1994)

Geologic Map of Newberry Volcano, Deschutes, Klamath, and Lake Counties, Oregon U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigation Series Map I-2455 (Norman S. MacLeod, David R. Sherrod, Lawrence A. Chitwood and Robert A. Jensen, 1995)

Thermal Springs of the United States and Other Countries of the World—A Summary U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 492 (Gerald A. Waring, revised by Reginald R. Blankenship and Ray Bentall, 1965)


Historic Highway Bridges of Oregon (Dwight A. Smith, James B. Norman and Pieter T. Dykman, 1986)

History of the Oregon State Parks — 1917-1963 (Chester H. Armstrong, 1965)

Oregon's Highway Park System: 1921-1989 — An Administrative History (Lawrence C. Merriam, Jr. and David G. Talbot, 1992)




NPS Reflections



Joe-Pye-weed (NPS photo)


An Ethnobotany of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore:
Plant Uses of the Ojibwa People
Rebecca S. Toupal

Overview

Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (INDU) was established at the south end of Lake Michigan on November 5, 1966 "to preserve for the educational, inspirational, and recreational use of the public certain portions of the Indiana dunes and other areas of scenic, scientific, and historic interest and recreational value" (P.L. 89-761, 89th Congress, 80 Stat 1309). The combination of sand dunes and diverse native flora in such close proximity to several urban areas provided the impetus for protection of the area. Subsequent amendments to the original authorizing legislation in 1976, 1980, 1986, and 1992 increased the park’s acreage to over 15,000 acres including 2,182 acres in Indiana Dunes State Park that are managed by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources.

Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore encompasses a mosaic of habitats including beaches, sand dunes, bogs and other wetland areas, and woodland forests. The park includes the 1830's Bailly homestead, the 1900-era Chellberg farm, and several "Century of Progress" homes from the 1933-1934 Chicago’s World’s Fair. Today, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore ranks 7th among national parks in native plant diversity with 1,462 species, 217 of which having special status (INDU staff 2004):

27 endangered
11 endangered, locally rare
38 threatened
5 threatened, locally rare
4 extirpated
6 extirpated, locally rare
35 rare
84 locally rare
1 rare, threatened
3 rare, locally rare
1 special concern
2 watch list

While the main goal of the park has been to protect the dunes and diverse plant life, many American Indian tribes used and cared for the area extensively to support hunting, plant gathering, and fasting activities until the land was ceded in 1832 (Toupal 2006). The landscape inherited by the park contains remnants of the traditional landscape. The Ojibway people are among many tribes who used and/or traveled through the area including the Miami, Potawatomi, Ottawa, Menominee, Meskwaki, Winnebago, Delaware, Shawnee, Kickapoo, Mascouten, Missisauga, Mohegan, Piankeshaw, Sauk-Fox, Wea, and Wyandot (Tanner 1987; Yarnell 1964). Today, Ojibway people continue to use many of the plants found in the park and the surrounding area in traditional ways (Herron 2002; Toupal 2006; Zede et al. 2000, 2001).


Rangers at Maple Sugar Time. (NPS photo)

Geographic and Cultural Focus of the Research

Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and the plant species within it, provides the focal point for this ethnobotany. The plants found in the park once were found throughout the Great Lakes area and were used by many tribes including the Ojibway.

There are many Ojibway groups in Michigan and Wisconsin. Identification of traditionally associated Ojibway groups began with contacting the Michigan Anishinaabek Cultural Preservation and Repatriation Alliance (MACPRA). The MACPRA president Summer Cohen recommended contacting all the Michigan tribes with interest in the southwest Michigan area (that in closest proximity to Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore), and included lists of Michigan and Wisconsin Ojibway groups:

Southwest Michigan
Grand River Band of Ottawa Indians, Grand Rapids, MI
Little River Band of Odawa, Manistee, MI
Hannahville Potawatomi Indian Community, Bark River, MI
Match-e-be-nash-shee-wish Band of Potawatomi Indians, Shelbyville, MI
Nottawaseppi Band of Huron Potawatomi, Fulton, MI
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi, Dowagiac, MI

Michigan Ojibway (aver. 351mi)
Burt Lake Band (293mi)
Grand Traverse Band (293mi)
Little Traverse Bay Bands (293mi)
Saginaw Chippewa (217mi)
Bay Mills Indian Community (432mi)
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe (432mi)
Lac Vieux Desert Band (425mi)
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (425mi)

Wisconsin Ojibway (aver. 445mi)
Bad River Band (475mi)
Lac Court Oreilles Band (466mi)
Lac du Flambeau Band (406mi)
Red Cliff Band (513mi)
St. Croix Chippewa (452mi)
Sokaogan Mole Lake Community (360mi)

This ethnobotany draws from numerous ethnographic and ethnohistoric sources that establish a continuity of use over the years.


Pinhook Bog (NPS photo)

Ojibway Ethnobotanical Knowledge

The traditional lives of the Ojibway people were intwined with their environments and reflected indepth knowledge of and close relationships with the resources comprising those environments. This human-nature relationship is perhaps best expressed and documented where it concerns plants. Johnston (1990) wrote that humans and animals could not survive without plants, but plants could survive without humans and animals, and consequently, have primacy over all other life. His statement, however, misrepresents the Ojibway people’s relationship with the environment in two ways. It imposes a hierarchical structure to ecosystems that does not exist in the Ojibway worldview, and it ignores the Ojibway people’s role in caring for the environment. They believe that they must actively take care of the plants or the plants will be in poor condition or move away, scenarios that have played out repeatedly where the Ojibway were removed from the land.

The Ojiway people have retained their traditional relationship with environments, specifically the Great Lakes environments, to some extent; enough so that they retain much ethnobotanical knowledge, particularly with regard to medicines. Documentation of their knowledge began in the late 19th century (see Hoffman 1891) and continued almost four decades later with Densmore (1928), Reagan (1928), Smith (1932), Gilmore (1933), and Stowe (1940). Smith (1932) declared the Ojibway people to be the most knowledgeable about plants, and found that their knowledge extended beyond individual species to include soils and habitats. "[They make] full use of everything that occurs [native flora] except the adventive or introduced plants. They recognize regular types of soil as sources of their medicinal plants. Sandy meadows, sandy wastes, lakes, still ponds, swamps, upland swamps, rocky openings in the forest, evergreen forests, and hardwood forests all are searched for distinctive plants. …Their knowledge of plants both in their own environment and far away is probably the best of any group of Indians. ...they make trips far away from their home to obtain necessary plants" (Smith 1932:342, 348). Densmore (1929) provided a basis for the Ojibway people’s indepth knowledge when she noted that the passing on of plant knowledge began early. Children were encouraged to gather flowers from which their parents or grandparents would dry, grind, and make a beverage. In this way, the children learned the value of plants and that some plants had medicinal properties.

Of the traditional use plants he recorded, Smith (1932) found that the Ojibway made more use of species in the composite (Asteraceae), grass (Poaceae), and sedge (Cyperaceae) families than did other tribes; they also made use of many species of the heath family (Ericaceae). Moerman’s (1979) analysis showed that statistically the composite family was the most important for medicinal needs. Investigations of native plant medicines have shown that these species have a real basis of effectiveness in phytochemical constituents such as monoterpenes, tannins, and salicylates (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981).


Volunteer with Ranger. (NPS photo)

The Ojibway people used a wide variety of plant parts for food including buds, flowers, shoots, leaves, fruits, nuts, seeds, roots, bulbs, rhizomes, inner bark (phloem and cambium), and sap. Fruits were the most exploited plant part, and were eaten fresh and preserved, or dried for use in cooking, including in soups and stews. Nuts were consumed raw, or mashed for use in soups and stews. Leaves, buds, and flowers of herbaceous plants were cooked and eaten as greens. Fern shoots (Matteuccia struthiopteris, Onoclea sensibilis, Osmunda cinnamomea) were a particularly important source of greens in the spring and early summer (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981).

The line between food and medicine plants (every plant is a medicine in Ojibway thought (Smith 1932)), and the line between medicine and ceremonial plants are not absolute. Beverages such as those made from the flowers the children collected could be for everyday use, for medicinal needs, or for spring and fall tonics that were taken as preventatives (Gilmore 1933). All of these were recognized as being beneficial to one’s health and well-being.

Medicinal and ceremonial plants had critical roles in the well-being of the Ojibway people and their communities as well (Zede et al. 2000, 2001), and the practice of medicine and religion often coincided in some way (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981). Since Indian medicine is complex, and an intricate part of maintaining a cohesive cultural unit, it must be understood as interwoven with the world view and religious beliefs of the Indian peoples (Herrick 1977). The Midewiwin or Grand Medicine Society of the Ojibway people is an ancient organization involving healing and religious guidance (Smith 1932). To become part of the Midewiwin, one progressed through a series of grades to learn the rituals and herbalism for curing physical and mental illnesses (Hoffman 1891; Landes 1968; Smith 1932).

Medicinal plants are sacred and must "be secured with the proper mide ceremony. This consisted of an explanatory song, and the offering of tobacco to grandmother, the earth, and Winabojo, their cultural hero" (Smith 1932:345). Only those who showed the predisposition for medicinal knowledge could become part of the Midewiwin, and that knowledge was shared through specific channels. "The young man, who had the proper dream following the period of fasting in his youth, predicting his predilection towards the medicine man's profession, was taken through a rigorous course of training. Individual knowledge was handed down through the family. Instruction to boys and girls usually comes from the uncle or aunt" (Smith 1932:349). There are four grades or degrees of the Midewiwin, each more complex than the preceding. The fourth degree is the most complex, and involves the use of charms or bewitching plants, and those most knowledgeable at this level are called jugglers or "Jessakîd." His powers include the supernatural, and he is the most feared and respected healer among the Ojibway (Smith 1932:426-427). Medicinal combinations of nine to twelve herbs were common, and reflected extensive training. The amounts of each herb varied with the strength of the plant; larger amounts of weaker medicines were combined with smaller amounts of stronger medicines. Sweetflag (Acorus calamus), for example, was used sparingly because its effect was so severe (Smith 1932).


Wild Lupines & Puccoons (NPS photo)

As with food plants, the Ojibway people make use of many plant parts for medicinal needs. Ojibway herbalists used roots, rhizomes, and whole plants as their major source of medicine (Youngken 1924), although all other parts of plants were used as needed. The Ojibway understood that the chemical constituents in plants often were concentrated in specific parts, and would collect these parts for specific needs but only at the appropriate time. If gathered at the wrong time, the plant’s medicinal qualities may be inert, undeveloped, or dispersed (Smith 1932).

The plant materials collected from the wild are seen as special gifts, available for the taking, but with a gift of tobacco given in exchange as spiritual cooperation is a necessary component for effective treatment (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981). When digging roots, for example, the herbalist would place tobacco in the cavity left by the roots, and pray through song to make the medicine potent. All plant gathering, particulary for medicinal purposes, involved songs specific to the plant and need. The need for the spiritual component is reflected as well in the results of scientific analyses to determine the reality of medicinal value. "Much of the knowledge of white men originated from studying the Indian plant uses, in the early days. Eclectic practitioners sought the Indian herbs and observed carefully what parts of the plant were used. This mass of early information was sifted scientifically by the students of medicine, and finally tested physiologically on animals. Perhaps sixty-five per cent of their remedies were found to be potent and are included in our pharmacopoeas; the other thirty-five per cent were discovered to be valueless medicinally" (Smith 1932:348). The apparent inefficacy of that thirty-five per cent supports the Ojibway herbalists’ understanding that while every plant is a medicine, it is not for everyone; nor is this a limitation that reduces the plant’s value as a medicine.

In the Ojibway language, plants can have multiple common names, some of which may be used for more than one species. These names reflect categories of medicinal use such as "revivers." The names are descriptive as well, illustrating the interwoven nature of the Ojibway people’s relationship with plants. "The medicine name usually tells what the plant looks like, where it may be found, some peculiar taste or property, or its chief use. Often a termination is added signifying the plural of a noun or the part of the plant used, such as the wood, the leaf, the flower, the root, or the berry or fruit" (Smith 1932:348).

In addition to foods, medicines, and ceremonies, the use of plants included utility, charms, and dyes. Most of the implements used food procurement and processing were made from the wood of trees and shrubs. Birch bark, for example, was indispensable in traditional food gathering activities, and crafts. It was used to build canoes and dwellings of seasonal camps, to make storage and cooking containers, to make tools, utensils, and numerous craft items (Zede et al. 2000, 2001).

Charms were made with medicine plants specific to the user’s need. Charms generally were for good luck in the hunt, protection in war, and success in love (Densmore 1929). Hunting charms, for example, were applied by tracing an outline of the target animal on the ground, drawing a line through its heart, and placing the appropriate medicine on the "puncture" (Smith 1932). Densmore (1929: 108) identified seven categories of charms: "(a) Love charms, (b) charms to attract worldly goods, (c) charms to insure safety and success, (d) charms to influence or attract animals, (e) protective charms, (f) charms to work evil, and (g) antidotes for evil charms." Fourth-degree healers were required to remove or counter evil charms.


Firefighters after the burn. (NPS photo)

Dyes were obtained from many plants including various berries and barks, gold thread roots, bloodroots, butternut and hazelnut nut hulls, and wild plums (Levi 1956). The Ojibway people would boil the material to be colored in a mixture of plant parts and some mordant to set the color. Mordants included various clays, the red or black sand that bubbles up in a spring, or stone dust, perhaps with a few, rusty, iron nails thrown in the kettle for good measure. Sometimes black oak bark (Quercus velutina) was used to set the color (Smith 1932).

Even as change came to the Ojibway people’s traditional life, they resisted giving up their plants and practices while adopting new ones. They added introduced plants to their native pharmacopeia (e.g. Plantago major), and developed new uses for native plants in response to European diseases such as smallpox, tuberculosis, and venereal disease (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981). The importance of foods such as wild rice and maple sap, and the medicine plants has remained, as evidenced in particular by the continuation of the Midewiwin (Zede et al. 2001). The Ojibway people continued to apply and teach plant knowledge to their children through the 20th century. In 1964, Yarnell reviewed traditional use of plants in the Upper Great Lakes area, placing it in an ecological, archaeological, and ethnobotanical framework (Arnason, Hebda, and Johns 1981). More recently, the continuity of Ojibway plant use was recorded by Zede et al. (2000, 2001) and Herron (2002). The Ojibway people’s traditional relationship with their environments continues to provide a resource today that they turn to in their efforts to retain and rebuild their culture.

            Text from An Ethnobotany of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: Plant Uses of the Ojibwa People, April 2009.


(NPS photo)






Archives Search


Our Companion Website

Parks Canada History


External Archives



National Park Friends


National Park Foundation Association of National Park Rangers The Coalition to Protect America's National Parks National Parks Conservation Association National Park Travelers Club George Wright Society


Eastern National
Western National Parks


Please Note: NPSHistory.com is an independent effort; we are not an official partner of the National Park Service (NPS), though a huge debt of gratitude is extended to all NPS employees (current and former) and other park supporters who have graciously contributed their personal collections, thus enabling us to present these rather scarce documents for free public use. Due diligence has been employed in scanning these documents in an attempt to ensure the accuracy of the materials presented, however, we make no representations or warranties of any kind about these digital documents. While most of the content contained herein is in the public domain, the Website also contains copyrighted works (permission to host this content is on file); please respect the reserved rights of these copyright-holders. Use of this Website is done so at your own risk; we are not responsible for any loss or damage arising from information or links contained within this site. Enjoy!

 
Our National Parks — North America's Best Idea
NPSHISTORY.COM ❖ DIGITAL HOARDING SINCE 2013